Matchup Prediction
Army
has the edge in this matchup
Both Momentum Control (CSS) and Game Control metrics favor
Army entering this game.
Momentum Control
58.4%
Army wins
Lean
Game Control
67.1%
Army wins
Solid
Vegas Spread
Army -6
O/U 39.5
ESPN Bet
Advanced Stats
Advanced factors are split · No strong agreement signal
↓ See full breakdown
Navy 2024 Schedule
Navy's 2024 Schedule
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 8/31 | Navy vs Bucknell | -31.5W49–21 | 48.5 | W49–21 | O | N |
| Sat 9/7 | Navy vs Temple | -11.5W38–11 | 43.5 | W38–11 | O | Y |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Sat 9/21 | Navy vs Memphis | +9.5W56–44 | 47.0 | W56–44 | O | Y |
| Sat 9/28 | Navy at UAB | -4.5W41–18 | 56.5 | W41–18 | O | Y |
| Sat 10/5 | Navy at Air Force | -10.0W34–7 | 37.0 | W34–7 | O | Y |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Sat 10/19 | Navy vs Charlotte | -16.5W51–17 | 57.5 | W51–17 | O | Y |
| Sat 10/26 | Navy vs Notre Dame | +14.0L14–51 | 50.5 | L14–51 | O | N |
| Sat 11/2 | Navy at Rice | -12.5L10–24 | 49.0 | L10–24 | U | N |
| Sat 11/9 | Navy at South Florida | -4.5W28–7 | 59.5 | W28–7 | U | Y |
| Sat 11/16 | Navy vs Tulane | +7.5L0–35 | 49.0 | L0–35 | U | N |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Fri 11/29 | Navy at East Carolina | +2.5W34–20 | 54.0 | W34–20 | U | Y |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Sat 12/14 | Navy vs Army | +6.0 | 39.5 | — | — | — |
| Fri 12/27 | Navy vs Oklahoma | -1.0W21–20 | 44.0 | W21–20 | U | N |
Army 2024 Schedule
Army's 2024 Schedule
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 8/30 | Army vs Lehigh | -28 | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/7 | Army at Florida Atlantic | +1.5W24–7 | 42.5 | W24–7 | U | Y |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Sat 9/21 | Army vs Rice | -7.0W37–14 | 44.0 | W37–14 | O | Y |
| Thu 9/26 | Army at Temple | -11.0W42–14 | 46.5 | W42–14 | O | Y |
| Sat 10/5 | Army at Tulsa | -13.5W49–7 | 50.5 | W49–7 | O | Y |
| Sat 10/12 | Army vs UAB | -27.0W44–10 | 55.5 | W44–10 | U | Y |
| Sat 10/19 | Army vs East Carolina | -17.5W45–28 | 54.0 | W45–28 | O | N |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Sat 11/2 | Army vs Air Force | -18.0W20–3 | 38.5 | W20–3 | U | N |
| Sat 11/9 | Army at North Texas | -6.5W14–3 | 68.0 | W14–3 | U | Y |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Sat 11/23 | Army vs Notre Dame | +14.5L14–49 | 44.5 | L14–49 | O | N |
| Sat 11/30 | Army vs UTSA | -6.5W29–24 | 53.5 | W29–24 | U | N |
| Fri 12/6 | Army vs Tulane | +4.5W35–14 | 46.5 | W35–14 | O | Y |
| Sat 12/14 | Army vs Navy | -6.0 | 39.5 | — | — | — |
| Sat 12/28 | Army vs Louisiana Tech | -15.0W27–6 | 44.5 | W27–6 | U | Y |
Advanced Stats
Advanced Analytics Matchup
Matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense) ·
2024 season
Agreement Signals — When All Metrics Agree
Elite · 83.1% ATS
PPA + PPO + SR + Havoc
Split
Metrics disagree
Elite · 82.4% ATS
PPA + PPO + Havoc
Split
Metrics disagree
Elite · 73.9% ATS
PPA + Success Rate
Split
Metrics disagree
Individual Factors — Ranked by Predictive Strength
PPA Overall
Points added per play · Elite predictor
PPA Passing
Pass efficiency edge · Strong predictor
Havoc Total
Def. disruption rate · Strong predictor
TFLs, sacks, PBUs, forced fumbles — higher is better
Points Per Opp
Drive-finishing edge · Strong predictor
Success Rate
Play consistency edge · Solid predictor
Field Position
Avg start (lower=better) · Solid predictor
Avg yards from own endzone to average start — lower is better · longer bar = better field position
Advanced stats sourced from CFBD · 2024 season ·
Edges are matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense)
Power Ratings
Team Power Ratings
Overall · Offense · Defense ratings · Updated as season progresses
Power ratings updated throughout the season as results accumulate
Momentum Control (CSS)
Consecutive Scoring Sequences
Who builds scoring momentum?
Army Edge
Army +0.15
CSS Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 58.4% of games historically
Based on 11 games this season
Game Control (GC)
Win Probability Dominance
Who controls games start to finish?
Army Edge
Army +12.1
GC Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 67.1% of games historically
Based on 12 games this season
Spread Context
ATS Historical Context
Based on 2021–2025 backtest · FBS vs FBS · Regular season
Both metrics agree on Army with a solid GC edge. Teams with this profile have covered 53.0% of the time historically (n=330) — a mild lean.
ATS data is informational only. Past cover rates do not guarantee future results.
Coaching Matchup
Navy
Brian Newberry #1
5–7 (42%)
· Yr 2 at school
OC
Drew Cronic
Yr 1
#1
DC
P.J. Volker
Yr 2
#1
Army
Jeff Monken #1
70–55 (56%)
· Yr 11 at school
OC
Cody Worley
Yr 1
#1
DC
Nate Woody
Yr 3
#1
About these metrics
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games. ✓
Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: CSS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: GS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself ✓
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games. ✓
Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: CSS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: GS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself ✓