Matchup Prediction
Georgia
has the edge in this matchup
Both Momentum Control (CSS) and Game Control metrics favor
Georgia entering this game.
Momentum Control
58.4%
Georgia wins
Lean
Game Control
50.6%
Georgia wins
Toss-up
Vegas Spread
Georgia -21
O/U 50.0
DraftKings
Advanced Stats
Advanced factors are split · No strong agreement signal
↓ See full breakdown
Auburn 2024 Schedule
Auburn's 2024 Schedule
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 8/31 | Auburn vs Alabama A&M | -48.5W73–3 | 58.5 | W73–3 | O | Y |
| Sat 9/7 | Auburn vs California | -11.5L14–21 | 52.5 | L14–21 | U | N |
| Sat 9/14 | Auburn vs New Mexico | -25.5W45–19 | 58.5 | W45–19 | O | Y |
| Sat 9/21 | Auburn vs Arkansas | -2.5L14–24 | 53.5 | L14–24 | U | N |
| Sat 9/28 | Auburn vs Oklahoma | -2.0L21–27 | 43.0 | L21–27 | O | N |
| Sat 10/5 | Auburn at Georgia | +21.0L13–31 | 50.0 | L13–31 | U | Y |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Sat 10/19 | Auburn at Missouri | +3.5L17–21 | 49.5 | L17–21 | U | N |
| Sat 10/26 | Auburn at Kentucky | +2.0W24–10 | 43.5 | W24–10 | U | Y |
| Sat 11/2 | Auburn vs Vanderbilt | -7.5L7–17 | 48.0 | L7–17 | U | N |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Sat 11/16 | Auburn vs UL Monroe | -24.5W48–14 | 46.0 | W48–14 | O | Y |
| Sat 11/23 | Auburn vs Texas A&M | +2.5W43–41 | 47.0 | W43–41 | O | Y |
| Sat 11/30 | Auburn at Alabama | +10.5L14–28 | 50.5 | L14–28 | U | N |
Georgia 2024 Schedule
Georgia's 2024 Schedule
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 8/31 | Georgia vs Clemson | -10.5W34–3 | 49.0 | W34–3 | U | Y |
| Sat 9/7 | Georgia vs Tennessee Tech | -54.5W48–3 | 62.5 | W48–3 | U | N |
| Sat 9/14 | Georgia at Kentucky | -24.0W13–12 | 45.0 | W13–12 | U | N |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Sat 9/28 | Georgia at Alabama | -2.0L34–41 | 50.0 | L34–41 | O | N |
| Sat 10/5 | Georgia vs Auburn | -21.0W31–13 | 50.0 | W31–13 | U | N |
| Sat 10/12 | Georgia vs Mississippi State | -34.0W41–31 | 53.5 | W41–31 | O | N |
| Sat 10/19 | Georgia at Texas | +4.0W30–15 | 57.0 | W30–15 | U | Y |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Sat 11/2 | Georgia vs Florida | -14.5W34–20 | 52.5 | W34–20 | O | N |
| Sat 11/9 | Georgia at Ole Miss | -1.5L10–28 | 54.5 | L10–28 | U | N |
| Sat 11/16 | Georgia vs Tennessee | -8.5W31–17 | 47.0 | W31–17 | O | Y |
| Sat 11/23 | Georgia vs Massachusetts | -42.5W59–21 | 55.5 | W59–21 | O | N |
| Fri 11/29 | Georgia vs Georgia Tech | -17.5W44–42 | 48.5 | W44–42 | O | N |
| Sat 12/7 | Georgia vs Texas | +2.5W22–19 | 50.5 | W22–19 | U | Y |
| Thu 1/2 | Georgia vs Notre Dame | +1.5L10–23 | 46.5 | L10–23 | U | N |
Advanced Stats
Advanced Analytics Matchup
Matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense) ·
2024 season
Agreement Signals — When All Metrics Agree
Elite · 83.1% ATS
PPA + PPO + SR + Havoc
Split
Metrics disagree
Elite · 82.4% ATS
PPA + PPO + Havoc
Split
Metrics disagree
Elite · 73.9% ATS
PPA + Success Rate
Split
Metrics disagree
Individual Factors — Ranked by Predictive Strength
PPA Overall
Points added per play · Elite predictor
PPA Passing
Pass efficiency edge · Strong predictor
Havoc Total
Def. disruption rate · Strong predictor
TFLs, sacks, PBUs, forced fumbles — higher is better
Points Per Opp
Drive-finishing edge · Strong predictor
Success Rate
Play consistency edge · Solid predictor
Field Position
Avg start (lower=better) · Solid predictor
Avg yards from own endzone to average start — lower is better · longer bar = better field position
Advanced stats sourced from CFBD · 2024 season ·
Edges are matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense)
Power Ratings
Team Power Ratings
Overall · Offense · Defense ratings · Updated as season progresses
Power ratings updated throughout the season as results accumulate
Momentum Control (CSS)
Consecutive Scoring Sequences
Who builds scoring momentum?
Georgia Edge
Georgia +0.92
CSS Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 58.4% of games historically
Based on 3 games this season
Game Control (GC)
Win Probability Dominance
Who controls games start to finish?
Georgia Edge
Georgia +3.0
GC Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 50.6% of games historically
Based on 4 games this season
Actual Result
CSS Battle
Georgia
1 — 0 sequences
✓ Predicted correctly
GC Battle
Georgia
74.5 — 10.2 GC score
✓ Predicted correctly
Game Result
Georgia won by 18
✓ Model called it
Spread Context
ATS Historical Context
Based on 2021–2025 backtest · FBS vs FBS · Regular season
Both metrics agree on Georgia, but the GC edge is small. When metrics agree but GC is near-neutral, the agreed-upon team has covered only 46.7% of the time historically (n=224) — potentially a fade signal.
ATS data is informational only. Past cover rates do not guarantee future results.
Coaching Matchup
Auburn
Hugh Freeze #1
6–7 (46%)
· Yr 2 at school
OC
Derrick Nix
Yr 1
#1
DC
D. J. Durkin
Yr 1
#1
Georgia
Kirby Smart #1
94–16 (86%)
· Yr 9 at school
OC
Mike Bobo
Yr 2
#1
DC
Glenn Schumann
Yr 1
#1
About these metrics
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games. ✓
Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: Momentum Control is a great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: Game Control is another great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself ✓
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games. ✓
Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: Momentum Control is a great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: Game Control is another great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself ✓