Matchup Prediction
Metrics disagree on this matchup
Momentum Control favors Tennessee,
while Game Control favors Clemson.
Split signals historically show weaker predictive confidence — treat as a toss-up.
⚡ Split Signal — Metrics Disagree
Momentum Control
73.7%
Tennessee wins
Solid
Game Control
50.6%
Clemson wins
Toss-up
Vegas Spread
Clemson -4
O/U 62.0
Bovada
Advanced Stats
PPA + Success Rate agree → Tennessee
· 73.9% ATS historically
↓ See full breakdown
Tennessee 2022 Schedule
Tennessee's 2022 Schedule
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 9/1 | Tennessee vs Ball State | -37.0W59–10 | 66.5 | W59–10 | O | Y |
| Sat 9/10 | Tennessee at Pittsburgh | -6.0W34–27 | 63.0 | W34–27 | U | Y |
| Sat 9/17 | Tennessee vs Akron | -47.5W63–6 | 67.0 | W63–6 | O | Y |
| Sat 9/24 | Tennessee vs Florida | -11.0W38–33 | 62.0 | W38–33 | O | N |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Sat 10/8 | Tennessee at LSU | -2.5W40–13 | 63.0 | W40–13 | U | Y |
| Sat 10/15 | Tennessee vs Alabama | +9.0W52–49 | 68.0 | W52–49 | O | Y |
| Sat 10/22 | Tennessee vs UT Martin | -38.5W65–24 | 71.5 | W65–24 | O | Y |
| Sat 10/29 | Tennessee vs Kentucky | -10.5W44–6 | 62.5 | W44–6 | U | Y |
| Sat 11/5 | Tennessee at Georgia | +9.5L13–27 | 65.5 | L13–27 | U | N |
| Sat 11/12 | Tennessee vs Missouri | -18.5W66–24 | 57.5 | W66–24 | O | Y |
| Sat 11/19 | Tennessee at South Carolina | -22.5L38–63 | 66.5 | L38–63 | O | N |
| Sat 11/26 | Tennessee at Vanderbilt | -14.0W56–0 | 63.5 | W56–0 | U | Y |
| Fri 12/30 | Tennessee vs Clemson | +4.0W31–14 | 62.0 | W31–14 | U | Y |
Clemson 2022 Schedule
Clemson's 2022 Schedule
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 9/5 | Clemson vs Georgia Tech | -24.5W41–10 | 51.0 | W41–10 | U | Y |
| Sat 9/10 | Clemson vs Furman | -45.5W35–12 | 51.5 | W35–12 | U | N |
| Sat 9/17 | Clemson vs Louisiana Tech | -33.5W48–20 | 53.5 | W48–20 | O | N |
| Sat 9/24 | Clemson at Wake Forest | -7.5W51–45 | 58.0 | W51–45 | O | N |
| Sat 10/1 | Clemson vs NC State | -6.5W30–20 | 46.0 | W30–20 | O | Y |
| Sat 10/8 | Clemson at Boston College | -21.0W31–3 | 49.0 | W31–3 | U | Y |
| Sat 10/15 | Clemson at Florida State | -4.5W34–28 | 51.0 | W34–28 | O | Y |
| Sat 10/22 | Clemson vs Syracuse | -14.0W27–21 | 50.0 | W27–21 | U | N |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Sat 11/5 | Clemson at Notre Dame | -3.5L14–35 | 43.5 | L14–35 | O | N |
| Sat 11/12 | Clemson vs Louisville | -7.0W31–16 | 52.0 | W31–16 | U | Y |
| Sat 11/19 | Clemson vs Miami | -19.0W40–10 | 47.5 | W40–10 | O | Y |
| Sat 11/26 | Clemson vs South Carolina | -14.0L30–31 | 53.0 | L30–31 | O | N |
| Sat 12/3 | Clemson vs North Carolina | -7.5W39–10 | 64.0 | W39–10 | U | Y |
| Fri 12/30 | Clemson vs Tennessee | -4.0L14–31 | 62.0 | L14–31 | U | N |
Advanced Stats
Advanced Analytics Matchup
Matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense) ·
2022 season
Agreement Signals — When All Metrics Agree
Elite · 83.1% ATS
PPA + PPO + SR + Havoc
Split
Metrics disagree
Elite · 82.4% ATS
PPA + PPO + Havoc
Split
Metrics disagree
Elite · 73.9% ATS
PPA + Success Rate
Both Agree
→ Tennessee
Individual Factors — Ranked by Predictive Strength
PPA Overall
Points added per play · Elite predictor
PPA Passing
Pass efficiency edge · Strong predictor
Havoc Total
Def. disruption rate · Strong predictor
TFLs, sacks, PBUs, forced fumbles — higher is better
Points Per Opp
Drive-finishing edge · Strong predictor
Success Rate
Play consistency edge · Solid predictor
Field Position
Avg start (lower=better) · Solid predictor
Avg yards from own endzone to average start — lower is better · longer bar = better field position
Advanced stats sourced from CFBD · 2022 season ·
Edges are matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense)
Power Ratings
Team Power Ratings
Overall · Offense · Defense ratings · Updated as season progresses
Power ratings updated throughout the season as results accumulate
Momentum Control (CSS)
Consecutive Scoring Sequences
Who builds scoring momentum?
Tennessee Edge
Tennessee +1.25
CSS Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 73.7% of games historically
Based on 12 games this season
Game Control (GC)
Win Probability Dominance
Who controls games start to finish?
Clemson Edge
Clemson +0.0
GC Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 50.6% of games historically
Based on 13 games this season
Spread Context
ATS Historical Context
Based on 2021–2025 backtest · FBS vs FBS · Regular season
CSS and GC disagree on this matchup. When the metrics split, historical cover rates are essentially random — treat this as a coin flip against the spread.
ATS data is informational only. Past cover rates do not guarantee future results.
Coaching Matchup
Tennessee
Josh Heupel #1
7–6 (54%)
· Yr 2 at school
OC
Alex Golesh
Yr 2
#1
DC
Tim Banks
Yr 2
#1
Clemson
Dabo Swinney #1
150–36 (81%)
· Yr 15 at school
OC
Brandon Streeter
Yr 1
#1
DC
Mickey Conn
Yr 1
#1
About these metrics
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games. ✓
Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: Momentum Control is a great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: Game Control is another great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself ✓
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games. ✓
Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: Momentum Control is a great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: Game Control is another great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself ✓