Sat, Nov 26 2022
·
Week 13
·
🏟 Joan C. Edwards Stadium
Huntington, WV
·
Turf
·
38,019 cap
Georgia State✈ 342 miSame TZ
Matchup Prediction
Metrics disagree on this matchup
Momentum Control favors Georgia State,
while Game Control favors Marshall.
Split signals historically show weaker predictive confidence — treat as a toss-up.
⚡ Split Signal — Metrics Disagree
Momentum Control
61.3%
Georgia State wins
Lean
Game Control
58.6%
Marshall wins
Lean
Vegas Spread
Marshall -6.5
O/U 45.5
Bovada
Advanced Stats
All 4 factors agree → Marshall
· 83.1% ATS historically when all four align
↓ See full breakdown
Georgia State 2022 Schedule
Georgia State's 2022 Schedule
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 9/3 | Georgia State at South Carolina | +12.5L14–35 | 55.0 | L14–35 | U | N |
| Sat 9/10 | Georgia State vs North Carolina | +7.0L28–35 | 64.0 | L28–35 | U | Y |
| Sat 9/17 | Georgia State vs Charlotte | -19.5L41–42 | 64.0 | L41–42 | O | N |
| Thu 9/22 | Georgia State vs Coastal Carolina | +2.5L24–41 | 63.5 | L24–41 | O | N |
| Sat 10/1 | Georgia State at Army | +8.5W31–14 | 54.0 | W31–14 | U | Y |
| Sat 10/8 | Georgia State vs Georgia Southern | -2.5W41–33 | 67.5 | W41–33 | O | Y |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Wed 10/19 | Georgia State at App State | +9.5L17–42 | 60.5 | L17–42 | U | N |
| Sat 10/29 | Georgia State vs Old Dominion | -3.5W31–17 | 53.5 | W31–17 | U | Y |
| Sat 11/5 | Georgia State at Southern Miss | +2.0W42–14 | 47.5 | W42–14 | O | Y |
| Sat 11/12 | Georgia State vs UL Monroe | -13.5L28–31 | 59.5 | L28–31 | U | N |
| Sat 11/19 | Georgia State at James Madison | +10.0L40–42 | 51.5 | L40–42 | O | Y |
| Sat 11/26 | Georgia State at Marshall | +6.5L23–28 | 45.5 | L23–28 | O | Y |
Marshall 2022 Schedule
Marshall's 2022 Schedule
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 9/3 | Marshall vs Norfolk State | -40.5W55–3 | 59.0 | W55–3 | U | Y |
| Sat 9/10 | Marshall at Notre Dame | +20.5W26–21 | 48.0 | W26–21 | U | Y |
| Sat 9/17 | Marshall at Bowling Green | -17.0L31–34 | 50.0 | L31–34 | O | N |
| Sat 9/24 | Marshall at Troy | -3.0L7–16 | 51.5 | L7–16 | U | N |
| Sat 10/1 | Marshall vs Gardner-Webb | -31.0W28–7 | 56.0 | W28–7 | U | N |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Wed 10/12 | Marshall vs Louisiana | -10.5L13–23 | 45.5 | L13–23 | U | N |
| Sat 10/22 | Marshall at James Madison | +9.5W26–12 | 48.5 | W26–12 | U | Y |
| Sat 10/29 | Marshall vs Coastal Carolina | -2.5L13–24 | 54.0 | L13–24 | U | N |
| Sat 11/5 | Marshall at Old Dominion | -3.5W12–0 | 46.5 | W12–0 | U | Y |
| Sat 11/12 | Marshall vs App State | +2.0W28–21 | 47.5 | W28–21 | O | Y |
| Sat 11/19 | Marshall at Georgia Southern | -6.0W23–10 | 52.5 | W23–10 | U | Y |
| Sat 11/26 | Marshall vs Georgia State | -6.5W28–23 | 45.5 | W28–23 | O | N |
| Mon 12/19 | Marshall vs UConn | -11.5W28–14 | 42.0 | W28–14 | U | Y |
Advanced Stats
Advanced Analytics Matchup
Matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense) ·
2022 season
Agreement Signals — When All Metrics Agree
Elite · 83.1% ATS
PPA + PPO + SR + Havoc
All 4 Agree
→ Marshall
Elite · 82.4% ATS
PPA + PPO + Havoc
3 Agree
→ Marshall
Elite · 73.9% ATS
PPA + Success Rate
Both Agree
→ Marshall
Individual Factors — Ranked by Predictive Strength
PPA Overall
Points added per play · Elite predictor
PPA Passing
Pass efficiency edge · Strong predictor
Havoc Total
Def. disruption rate · Strong predictor
TFLs, sacks, PBUs, forced fumbles — higher is better
Points Per Opp
Drive-finishing edge · Strong predictor
Success Rate
Play consistency edge · Solid predictor
Field Position
Avg start (lower=better) · Solid predictor
Avg yards from own endzone to average start — lower is better · longer bar = better field position
Advanced stats sourced from CFBD · 2022 season ·
Edges are matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense)
Power Ratings
Team Power Ratings
Overall · Offense · Defense ratings · Updated as season progresses
Power ratings updated throughout the season as results accumulate
Momentum Control (CSS)
Consecutive Scoring Sequences
Who builds scoring momentum?
Georgia State Edge
Georgia State +0.78
CSS Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 61.3% of games historically
Based on 10 games this season
Game Control (GC)
Win Probability Dominance
Who controls games start to finish?
Marshall Edge
Marshall +11.1
GC Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 58.6% of games historically
Based on 11 games this season
Actual Result
CSS Battle
Marshall
2 — 0 sequences
✗ Predicted incorrectly
GC Battle
Marshall
36.5 — 35.2 GC score
✓ Predicted correctly
Game Result
Marshall won by 5
Spread Context
ATS Historical Context
Based on 2021–2025 backtest · FBS vs FBS · Regular season
CSS and GC disagree on this matchup. When the metrics split, historical cover rates are essentially random — treat this as a coin flip against the spread.
ATS data is informational only. Past cover rates do not guarantee future results.
Coaching Matchup
Georgia State
Shawn Elliott #1
30–30 (50%)
· Yr 6 at school
OC
Trent McKnight
Yr 1
#1
DC
Nate Fuqua
Yr 2
#1
Marshall
Charles Huff #1
7–6 (54%)
· Yr 2 at school
OC
Clint Trickett
Yr 1
#1
DC
Lance Guidry
Yr 2
#1
About these metrics
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games. ✓
Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: CSS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: GS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself ✓
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games. ✓
Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: CSS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: GS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself ✓