BYU at Notre Dame Week 6 College Football Matchup BYU at Notre Dame Matchup - Week 6
Sat, Oct 8 2022 · Week 6 · Neutral Site · 🏟 Allegiant Stadium Las Vegas, NV · Turf · 65,000 cap
BYU✈ 2,184 mi-1 hr TZ Notre Dame✈ 908 mi-3 hr TZ
Away (Neutral)
20 28
Final
Home (Neutral)
📊 Punt & Rally Projection
BYU
21
Notre Dame
33
P&R Line Notre Dame -11.5
P&R Total O/U 53.5
Confidence 90 High
Vegas Notre Dame -4 · O/U 51.0
Matchup Prediction
Metrics disagree on this matchup
Momentum Control favors Notre Dame, while Game Control favors BYU. Split signals historically show weaker predictive confidence — treat as a toss-up.
⚡ Split Signal — Metrics Disagree
Momentum Control
58.4%
Notre Dame wins
Lean
Game Control
58.3%
BYU wins
Lean
Vegas Spread
Notre Dame -4
O/U 51.0
teamrankings
Advanced Stats
All 4 factors agree → Notre Dame · 83.1% ATS historically when all four align
↓ See full breakdown
🛋 Notre Dame Coming off BYE
BYU 2022 Schedule
BYU's 2022 Schedule
DateMatchupSpreadTotalResultO/UCover
Sat 9/3BYU at South Florida-11.0W50–2158.5W50–21OY
Sat 9/10BYU vs Baylor-2.5W26–2054.5W26–20UY
Sat 9/17BYU at Oregon+3.5L20–4158.0L20–41ON
Sat 9/24BYU vs Wyoming-21.5W38–2450.0W38–24ON
Thu 9/29BYU vs Utah State-26.0W38–2660.0W38–26ON
Sat 10/8BYU vs Notre Dame+4.0L20–2851.0L20–28UN
Sat 10/15BYU vs Arkansas-1.0L35–5266.5L35–52ON
Sat 10/22BYU at Liberty-7.0L14–4158.0L14–41UN
Fri 10/28BYU vs East Carolina-3.0L24–2764.0L24–27UN
Sat 11/5BYU at Boise State+9.5W31–2854.5W31–28OY
— Bye Week —
Sat 11/19BYU vs Utah Tech-23
Sat 11/26BYU at Stanford-6.0W35–2657.5W35–26OY
Sat 12/17BYU vs SMU+4.5W24–2365.0W24–23UY
Notre Dame 2022 Schedule
Notre Dame's 2022 Schedule
DateMatchupSpreadTotalResultO/UCover
Sat 9/3Notre Dame at Ohio State+17.0L10–2158.5L10–21UY
Sat 9/10Notre Dame vs Marshall-20.5L21–2648.0L21–26UN
Sat 9/17Notre Dame vs California-13.5W24–1741.5W24–17UN
Sat 9/24Notre Dame at North Carolina+2.5W45–3255.0W45–32OY
— Bye Week —
Sat 10/8Notre Dame vs BYU-4.0W28–2051.0W28–20UY
Sat 10/15Notre Dame vs Stanford-16.5L14–1653.5L14–16UN
Sat 10/22Notre Dame vs UNLV-26.0W44–2146.5W44–21ON
Sat 10/29Notre Dame at Syracuse+1.0W41–2448.0W41–24OY
Sat 11/5Notre Dame vs Clemson+3.5W35–1443.5W35–14OY
Sat 11/12Notre Dame vs Navy-17.0W35–3240.5W35–32ON
Sat 11/19Notre Dame vs Boston College-20.0W44–042.0W44–0OY
Sat 11/26Notre Dame at USC+4.0L27–3863.5L27–38ON
Fri 12/30Notre Dame vs South Carolina-5.0W45–3850.5W45–38OY
Advanced Stats
Advanced Analytics Matchup
Matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense) · 2022 season
Notre Dame PPA Edge
Agreement Signals — When All Metrics Agree
Elite · 83.1% ATS
PPA + PPO + SR + Havoc
All 4 Agree
→ Notre Dame
Elite · 82.4% ATS
PPA + PPO + Havoc
3 Agree
→ Notre Dame
Elite · 73.9% ATS
PPA + Success Rate
Both Agree
→ Notre Dame
Individual Factors — Ranked by Predictive Strength
PPA Overall
Points added per play · Elite predictor
BYU
+0.440
Notre Dame
+0.449
Notre Dame Edge
PPA Passing
Pass efficiency edge · Strong predictor
BYU
+0.544
Notre Dame
+0.585
Notre Dame Edge
Havoc Total
Def. disruption rate · Strong predictor
BYU
0.129
Notre Dame
0.147
TFLs, sacks, PBUs, forced fumbles — higher is better
Notre Dame Edge
Points Per Opp
Drive-finishing edge · Strong predictor
BYU
+8.254
Notre Dame
+8.641
Notre Dame Edge
Success Rate
Play consistency edge · Solid predictor
BYU
+0.845
Notre Dame
+0.959
Notre Dame Edge
Field Position
Avg start (lower=better) · Solid predictor
BYU
72.3
Notre Dame
66.6
Avg yards from own endzone to average start — lower is better · longer bar = better field position
Notre Dame Edge
Advanced stats sourced from CFBD · 2022 season · Edges are matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense)
Power Ratings
Team Power Ratings
Overall · Offense · Defense ratings · Updated as season progresses
Notre Dame Rated Higher
Overall Power Rating
BYU
14.4
Notre Dame
28.3
Offense Rating
BYU
21.4
Notre Dame
29.0
Defense Rating (lower = better defense)
BYU
7.0
Notre Dame
0.0
Power ratings updated throughout the season as results accumulate
Momentum Control (CSS)
Consecutive Scoring Sequences Who builds scoring momentum? Notre Dame Edge
Avg sequences created per game
BYU #71
1.20
Notre Dame #51
1.25
Avg sequences allowed per game (lower is better)
BYU #92
1.20
Notre Dame #12
0.50
Notre Dame +0.05
CSS Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 58.4% of games historically
Based on 4 games this season
Game Control (GC)
Win Probability Dominance Who controls games start to finish? BYU Edge
Avg GC score per game (offense)
BYU #1
59.1
Notre Dame #1
52.5
Avg GC score allowed per game (lower is better)
BYU #57
27.1
Notre Dame #31
33.4
BYU +6.6
GC Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 58.3% of games historically
Based on 4 games this season
Actual Result
CSS Battle
Tie
1 — 1 sequences
✗ Predicted incorrectly
GC Battle
Notre Dame
76.2 — 10.1 GC score
✗ Predicted incorrectly
Game Result
Notre Dame won by 8
Spread Context
ATS Historical Context
Based on 2021–2025 backtest · FBS vs FBS · Regular season

CSS and GC disagree on this matchup. When the metrics split, historical cover rates are essentially random — treat this as a coin flip against the spread.

ATS data is informational only. Past cover rates do not guarantee future results.

Coaching Matchup
BYU
Kalani Sitake #1
48–29 (62%) · Yr 7 at school
OC Aaron Roderick Yr 2 #1
DC Ilaisa Tuiaki Yr 2 #1
Staff Rating
0.00 #1
Notre Dame
Marcus Freeman #1
0–1 (0%) · Yr 1 at school
OC Tommy Rees Yr 2 #1
DC Al Golden Yr 1 #1
Staff Rating
0.00 #1
About these metrics
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games.

Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: CSS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set.

Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: GS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set.

Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself