Matchup Prediction
Utah
has the edge in this matchup
Both Momentum Control (CSS) and Game Control metrics favor
Utah entering this game.
Momentum Control
71.6%
Utah wins
Solid
Game Control
76%
Utah wins
Strong
Vegas Spread
Utah -24
O/U 52.5
teamrankings
Advanced Stats
All 4 factors agree → Utah
· 83.1% ATS historically when all four align
↓ See full breakdown
Colorado 2021 Schedule
Colorado's 2021 Schedule
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 9/3 | Colorado vs Northern Colorado | -37.5W35–7 | 56.5 | W35–7 | U | N |
| Sat 9/11 | Colorado vs Texas A&M | +17.5L7–10 | 51.0 | L7–10 | U | Y |
| Sat 9/18 | Colorado vs Minnesota | -2.5L0–30 | 49.0 | L0–30 | U | N |
| Sat 9/25 | Colorado at Arizona State | +13.5L13–35 | 45.5 | L13–35 | O | N |
| Sat 10/2 | Colorado vs USC | +9.0L14–37 | 50.5 | L14–37 | O | N |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Sat 10/16 | Colorado vs Arizona | -6.0W34–0 | 46.5 | W34–0 | U | Y |
| Sat 10/23 | Colorado at California | +8.0L3–26 | 44.0 | L3–26 | U | N |
| Sat 10/30 | Colorado at Oregon | +24.5L29–52 | 49.0 | L29–52 | O | Y |
| Sat 11/6 | Colorado vs Oregon State | +11.5W37–34 | 55.5 | W37–34 | O | Y |
| Sat 11/13 | Colorado at UCLA | +18.0L20–44 | 57.5 | L20–44 | O | N |
| Sat 11/20 | Colorado vs Washington | +6.5W20–17 | 43.0 | W20–17 | U | Y |
| Fri 11/26 | Colorado at Utah | +24.0L13–28 | 52.5 | L13–28 | U | Y |
Utah 2021 Schedule
Utah's 2021 Schedule
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 9/2 | Utah vs Weber State | -29.5W40–17 | 49.0 | W40–17 | O | N |
| Sat 9/11 | Utah at BYU | -7.0L17–26 | 50.0 | L17–26 | U | N |
| Sat 9/18 | Utah at San Diego State | -8.0L31–33 | 42.5 | L31–33 | O | N |
| Sat 9/25 | Utah vs Washington State | -15.0W24–13 | 53.5 | W24–13 | U | N |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Sat 10/9 | Utah at USC | +3.0W42–26 | 52.5 | W42–26 | O | Y |
| Sat 10/16 | Utah vs Arizona State | -1.0W35–21 | 51.0 | W35–21 | O | Y |
| Sat 10/23 | Utah at Oregon State | -3.0L34–42 | 57.5 | L34–42 | O | N |
| Sat 10/30 | Utah vs UCLA | -6.0W44–24 | 60.5 | W44–24 | O | Y |
| Fri 11/5 | Utah at Stanford | -10.0W52–7 | 52.0 | W52–7 | O | Y |
| Sat 11/13 | Utah at Arizona | -24.0W38–29 | 54.5 | W38–29 | O | N |
| Sat 11/20 | Utah vs Oregon | -3.0W38–7 | 58.5 | W38–7 | U | Y |
| Fri 11/26 | Utah vs Colorado | -24.0W28–13 | 52.5 | W28–13 | U | N |
| Fri 12/3 | Utah vs Oregon | -3.0W38–10 | 57.5 | W38–10 | U | Y |
| Sat 1/1 | Utah vs Ohio State | +4.5L45–48 | 64.5 | L45–48 | O | Y |
Advanced Stats
Advanced Analytics Matchup
Matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense) ·
2021 season
Agreement Signals — When All Metrics Agree
Elite · 83.1% ATS
PPA + PPO + SR + Havoc
All 4 Agree
→ Utah
Elite · 82.4% ATS
PPA + PPO + Havoc
3 Agree
→ Utah
Elite · 73.9% ATS
PPA + Success Rate
Both Agree
→ Utah
Individual Factors — Ranked by Predictive Strength
PPA Overall
Points added per play · Elite predictor
PPA Passing
Pass efficiency edge · Strong predictor
Havoc Total
Def. disruption rate · Strong predictor
TFLs, sacks, PBUs, forced fumbles — higher is better
Points Per Opp
Drive-finishing edge · Strong predictor
Success Rate
Play consistency edge · Solid predictor
Field Position
Avg start (lower=better) · Solid predictor
Avg yards from own endzone to average start — lower is better · longer bar = better field position
Advanced stats sourced from CFBD · 2021 season ·
Edges are matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense)
Power Ratings
Team Power Ratings
Overall · Offense · Defense ratings · Updated as season progresses
Power ratings updated throughout the season as results accumulate
Momentum Control (CSS)
Consecutive Scoring Sequences
Who builds scoring momentum?
Utah Edge
Utah +1.20
CSS Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 71.6% of games historically
Based on 10 games this season
Game Control (GC)
Win Probability Dominance
Who controls games start to finish?
Utah Edge
Utah +35.1
GC Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 76% of games historically
Based on 11 games this season
Actual Result
CSS Battle
Utah
2 — 0 sequences
✓ Predicted correctly
GC Battle
Utah
87.3 — 6.7 GC score
✓ Predicted correctly
Game Result
Utah won by 15
✓ Model called it
Spread Context
ATS Historical Context
Based on 2021–2025 backtest · FBS vs FBS · Regular season
Both metrics agree on Utah with a large edge. Historically, dominant teams like this are fully priced into the spread — the agreed-upon team covers just 50.2% of the time. The metrics predict game control better than they beat the number.
ATS data is informational only. Past cover rates do not guarantee future results.
Coaching Matchup
Colorado
Karl Dorrell #1
5–4 (56%)
· Yr 2 at school
OC
Darrin Chiaverini
Yr 1
#1
DC
Chris Wilson
Yr 1
#1
Utah
Kyle Whittingham #1
135–68 (67%)
· Yr 17 at school
OC
Andy Ludwig
Yr 1
#1
DC
Morgan Scalley
Yr 1
#1
About these metrics
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games. ✓
Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: CSS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: GS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself ✓
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games. ✓
Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: CSS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: GS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself ✓