Utah at Arizona Week 11 College Football Matchup Utah at Arizona Matchup - Week 11
Sat, Nov 13 2021 · Week 11 · 🏟 Arizona Stadium Tucson, AZ · Turf · 56,029 cap
Utah✈ 591 mi-1 hr TZ
Away
38 29
Final
Home
📊 Punt & Rally Projection
Utah
40
Arizona
14
P&R Line Utah -25.5
P&R Total O/U 54
Confidence 90 High
Vegas Utah -24 · O/U 54.5
Matchup Prediction
Utah has the edge in this matchup
Both Momentum Control (CSS) and Game Control metrics favor Utah entering this game.
Momentum Control
73.7%
Utah wins
Solid
Game Control
75.9%
Utah wins
Solid
Vegas Spread
Utah -24
O/U 54.5
teamrankings
Advanced Stats
All 4 factors agree → Utah · 83.1% ATS historically when all four align
↓ See full breakdown
🏠 Arizona 2nd straight Home Game 🚌 Utah 2nd straight Road Game
Utah 2021 Schedule
Utah's 2021 Schedule
DateMatchupSpreadTotalResultO/UCover
Thu 9/2Utah vs Weber State-29.5W40–1749.0W40–17ON
Sat 9/11Utah at BYU-7.0L17–2650.0L17–26UN
Sat 9/18Utah at San Diego State-8.0L31–3342.5L31–33ON
Sat 9/25Utah vs Washington State-15.0W24–1353.5W24–13UN
— Bye Week —
Sat 10/9Utah at USC+3.0W42–2652.5W42–26OY
Sat 10/16Utah vs Arizona State-1.0W35–2151.0W35–21OY
Sat 10/23Utah at Oregon State-3.0L34–4257.5L34–42ON
Sat 10/30Utah vs UCLA-6.0W44–2460.5W44–24OY
Fri 11/5Utah at Stanford-10.0W52–752.0W52–7OY
Sat 11/13Utah at Arizona-24.0W38–2954.5W38–29ON
Sat 11/20Utah vs Oregon-3.0W38–758.5W38–7UY
Fri 11/26Utah vs Colorado-24.0W28–1352.5W28–13UN
Fri 12/3Utah vs Oregon-3.0W38–1057.5W38–10UY
Sat 1/1Utah vs Ohio State+4.5L45–4864.5L45–48OY
Arizona 2021 Schedule
Arizona's 2021 Schedule
DateMatchupSpreadTotalResultO/UCover
Sat 9/4Arizona vs BYU+13.5L16–2454.0L16–24UY
Sat 9/11Arizona vs San Diego State-1.5L14–3846.0L14–38ON
Sat 9/18Arizona vs Northern Arizona-26.5L19–2153.5L19–21UN
Sat 9/25Arizona at Oregon+29.5L19–4158.5L19–41OY
— Bye Week —
Sat 10/9Arizona vs UCLA+16.0L16–3460.0L16–34UN
Sat 10/16Arizona at Colorado+6.0L0–3446.5L0–34UN
Fri 10/22Arizona vs Washington+17.5L16–2145.5L16–21UY
Sat 10/30Arizona at USC+22.0L34–4155.5L34–41OY
Sat 11/6Arizona vs California+7.0W10–347.0W10–3UY
Sat 11/13Arizona vs Utah+24.0L29–3854.5L29–38OY
Fri 11/19Arizona at Washington State+15.0L18–4452.5L18–44ON
Sat 11/27Arizona at Arizona State+20.0L15–3852.5L15–38ON
Advanced Stats
Advanced Analytics Matchup
Matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense) · 2021 season
Utah PPA Edge
Agreement Signals — When All Metrics Agree
Elite · 83.1% ATS
PPA + PPO + SR + Havoc
All 4 Agree
→ Utah
Elite · 82.4% ATS
PPA + PPO + Havoc
3 Agree
→ Utah
Elite · 73.9% ATS
PPA + Success Rate
Both Agree
→ Utah
Individual Factors — Ranked by Predictive Strength
PPA Overall
Points added per play · Elite predictor
Utah
+0.534
Arizona
+0.194
Utah Edge
PPA Passing
Pass efficiency edge · Strong predictor
Utah
+0.664
Arizona
+0.255
Utah Edge
Havoc Total
Def. disruption rate · Strong predictor
Utah
0.203
Arizona
0.168
TFLs, sacks, PBUs, forced fumbles — higher is better
Utah Edge
Points Per Opp
Drive-finishing edge · Strong predictor
Utah
+8.985
Arizona
+5.866
Utah Edge
Success Rate
Play consistency edge · Solid predictor
Utah
+0.899
Arizona
+0.790
Utah Edge
Field Position
Avg start (lower=better) · Solid predictor
Utah
68.0
Arizona
74.7
Avg yards from own endzone to average start — lower is better · longer bar = better field position
Utah Edge
Advanced stats sourced from CFBD · 2021 season · Edges are matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense)
Power Ratings
Team Power Ratings
Overall · Offense · Defense ratings · Updated as season progresses
Arizona Rated Higher
Overall Power Rating
Utah
7.3
Arizona
9.6
Offense Rating
Utah
18.2
Arizona
21.5
Defense Rating (lower = better defense)
Utah
10.9
Arizona
11.9
Power ratings updated throughout the season as results accumulate
Momentum Control (CSS)
Consecutive Scoring Sequences Who builds scoring momentum? Utah Edge
Avg sequences created per game
Utah #10
1.75
Arizona #121
0.25
Avg sequences allowed per game (lower is better)
Utah #21
0.50
Arizona #40
1.00
Utah +1.50
CSS Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 73.7% of games historically
Based on 8 games this season
Game Control (GC)
Win Probability Dominance Who controls games start to finish? Utah Edge
Avg GC score per game (offense)
Utah #1
61.1
Arizona #1
17.7
Avg GC score allowed per game (lower is better)
Utah #12
24.6
Arizona #127
72.7
Utah +43.4
GC Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 75.9% of games historically
Based on 9 games this season
Actual Result
CSS Battle
Tie
1 — 1 sequences
✗ Predicted incorrectly
GC Battle
Utah
5.4 — 81.9 GC score
✓ Predicted correctly
Game Result
Utah won by 9
✓ Model called it
Spread Context
ATS Historical Context
Based on 2021–2025 backtest · FBS vs FBS · Regular season

Both metrics agree on Utah with a large edge. Historically, dominant teams like this are fully priced into the spread — the agreed-upon team covers just 50.2% of the time. The metrics predict game control better than they beat the number.

ATS data is informational only. Past cover rates do not guarantee future results.

Coaching Matchup
Utah
Kyle Whittingham #1
135–68 (67%) · Yr 17 at school
OC Andy Ludwig Yr 1 #1
DC Morgan Scalley Yr 1 #1
Staff Rating
0.00 #1
Arizona
Jedd Fisch #1
0–3 (0%) · Yr 1 at school
OC Brennan Carroll Yr 1 #1
DC Don Brown Yr 1 #1
Staff Rating
0.00 #1
About these metrics
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games.

Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: Momentum Control is a great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set.

Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: Game Control is another great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set.

Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself