Charlotte at Louisiana Tech Week 11 College Football Matchup Charlotte at Louisiana Tech Matchup - Week 11
Sat, Nov 13 2021 · Week 11 · 🏟 Joe Aillet Stadium Ruston, LA · Turf · 28,019 cap
Charlotte✈ 709 mi-1 hr TZ
32 42
Final
📊 Punt & Rally Projection
Charlotte
28
Louisiana Tech
32
P&R Line Louisiana Tech -4.5
P&R Total O/U 60
Confidence 75 Good
Vegas Louisiana Tech -7 · O/U 58.0
Matchup Prediction
Metrics disagree on this matchup
Momentum Control favors Louisiana Tech, while Game Control favors Charlotte. Split signals historically show weaker predictive confidence — treat as a toss-up.
⚡ Split Signal — Metrics Disagree
Momentum Control
58.4%
Louisiana Tech wins
Lean
Game Control
49.4%
Charlotte wins
Toss-up
Vegas Spread
Louisiana Tech -7
O/U 58.0
teamrankings
Advanced Stats
Advanced factors are split · No strong agreement signal
↓ See full breakdown
Charlotte 2021 Schedule
Charlotte's 2021 Schedule
DateMatchupSpreadTotalResultO/UCover
Fri 9/3Charlotte vs Duke+6.0W31–2860.0W31–28UY
Sat 9/11Charlotte vs Gardner-Webb-23.0W38–1058.0W38–10UY
Sat 9/18Charlotte at Georgia State+4.5L9–2062.5L9–20UN
Fri 9/24Charlotte vs Middle Tennessee-2.5W42–3955.5W42–39OY
Sat 10/2Charlotte at Illinois+10.0L14–2454.0L14–24UY
Fri 10/8Charlotte at Florida International-3.5W45–3361.0W45–33OY
— Bye Week —
Thu 10/21Charlotte vs Florida Atlantic+6.5L9–3858.0L9–38UN
Sat 10/30Charlotte at Western Kentucky+19.5L13–4571.5L13–45UN
Sat 11/6Charlotte vs Rice-6.5W31–2451.5W31–24OY
Sat 11/13Charlotte at Louisiana Tech+7.0L32–4258.0L32–42ON
Sat 11/20Charlotte vs Marshall+14.0L28–4962.0L28–49ON
Sat 11/27Charlotte at Old Dominion+8.5L34–5655.5L34–56ON
Louisiana Tech 2021 Schedule
Louisiana Tech's 2021 Schedule
DateMatchupSpreadTotalResultO/UCover
Sat 9/4Louisiana Tech at Mississippi State+20.5L34–3552.5L34–35OY
Sat 9/11Louisiana Tech vs SE Louisiana-11.5W45–4270.5W45–42ON
Sat 9/18Louisiana Tech vs SMU+11.0L37–3965.0L37–39OY
Sat 9/25Louisiana Tech vs North Texas-9.5W24–1765.0W24–17UN
Sat 10/2Louisiana Tech at NC State+18.5L27–3456.0L27–34OY
— Bye Week —
Sat 10/16Louisiana Tech at UTEP-6.5L3–1955.5L3–19UN
Sat 10/23Louisiana Tech vs UTSA+5.5L16–4559.5L16–45ON
Sat 10/30Louisiana Tech at Old Dominion-4.0L20–2352.0L20–23UN
Sat 11/6Louisiana Tech at UAB+14.0L38–5249.5L38–52OY
Sat 11/13Louisiana Tech vs Charlotte-7.0W42–3258.0W42–32OY
Fri 11/19Louisiana Tech vs Southern Miss-15.0L19–3547.5L19–35ON
Sat 11/27Louisiana Tech at Rice-3.5L31–3552.5L31–35ON
Advanced Stats
Advanced Analytics Matchup
Matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense) · 2021 season
Louisiana Tech PPA Edge
Agreement Signals — When All Metrics Agree
Elite · 83.1% ATS
PPA + PPO + SR + Havoc
Split
Metrics disagree
Elite · 82.4% ATS
PPA + PPO + Havoc
Split
Metrics disagree
Elite · 73.9% ATS
PPA + Success Rate
Split
Metrics disagree
Individual Factors — Ranked by Predictive Strength
PPA Overall
Points added per play · Elite predictor
Charlotte
+0.513
Louisiana Tech
+0.564
Louisiana Tech Edge
PPA Passing
Pass efficiency edge · Strong predictor
Charlotte
+0.633
Louisiana Tech
+0.821
Louisiana Tech Edge
Havoc Total
Def. disruption rate · Strong predictor
Charlotte
0.137
Louisiana Tech
0.152
TFLs, sacks, PBUs, forced fumbles — higher is better
Louisiana Tech Edge
Points Per Opp
Drive-finishing edge · Strong predictor
Charlotte
+8.245
Louisiana Tech
+8.078
Charlotte Edge
Success Rate
Play consistency edge · Solid predictor
Charlotte
+0.910
Louisiana Tech
+0.891
Charlotte Edge
Field Position
Avg start (lower=better) · Solid predictor
Charlotte
72.2
Louisiana Tech
69.4
Avg yards from own endzone to average start — lower is better · longer bar = better field position
Louisiana Tech Edge
Advanced stats sourced from CFBD · 2021 season · Edges are matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense)
Power Ratings
Team Power Ratings
Overall · Offense · Defense ratings · Updated as season progresses
Louisiana Tech Rated Higher
Overall Power Rating
Charlotte
-17.8
Louisiana Tech
-5.0
Offense Rating
Charlotte
9.3
Louisiana Tech
13.5
Defense Rating (lower = better defense)
Charlotte
27.2
Louisiana Tech
18.4
Power ratings updated throughout the season as results accumulate
Momentum Control (CSS)
Consecutive Scoring Sequences Who builds scoring momentum? Louisiana Tech Edge
Avg sequences created per game
Charlotte #102
0.44
Louisiana Tech #82
0.63
Avg sequences allowed per game (lower is better)
Charlotte #123
1.33
Louisiana Tech #60
1.13
Louisiana Tech +0.18
CSS Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 58.4% of games historically
Based on 8 games this season
Game Control (GC)
Win Probability Dominance Who controls games start to finish? Charlotte Edge
Avg GC score per game (offense)
Charlotte #1
37.2
Louisiana Tech #1
33.4
Avg GC score allowed per game (lower is better)
Charlotte #100
44.0
Louisiana Tech #79
50.7
Charlotte +3.8
GC Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 49.4% of games historically
Based on 9 games this season
Spread Context
ATS Historical Context
Based on 2021–2025 backtest · FBS vs FBS · Regular season

CSS and GC disagree on this matchup. When the metrics split, historical cover rates are essentially random — treat this as a coin flip against the spread.

ATS data is informational only. Past cover rates do not guarantee future results.

Coaching Matchup
Charlotte
Will Healy #1
11–11 (50%) · Yr 3 at school
OC Mark Carney Yr 1 #1
DC Brandon Cooper Yr 1 #1
Staff Rating
0.00 #1
Louisiana Tech
Skip Holtz #1
62–43 (59%) · Yr 9 at school
OC Joe Sloan Yr 1 #1
DC David Blackwell Yr 1 #1
Staff Rating
0.00 #1
About these metrics
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games.

Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: Momentum Control is a great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set.

Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: Game Control is another great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set.

Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself