Matchup Prediction
Charlotte
has the edge in this matchup
Both Momentum Control (CSS) and Game Control metrics favor
Charlotte entering this game.
Momentum Control
61.3%
Charlotte wins
Lean
Game Control
75.9%
Charlotte wins
Solid
Vegas Spread
Illinois -10
O/U 54.0
teamrankings
Advanced Stats
3 factors agree (PPA + PPO + Havoc) → Illinois
· 82.4% ATS historically
↓ See full breakdown
Charlotte 2021 Schedule
Charlotte's 2021 Schedule
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 9/3 | Charlotte vs Duke | +6.0W31–28 | 60.0 | W31–28 | U | Y |
| Sat 9/11 | Charlotte vs Gardner-Webb | -23.0W38–10 | 58.0 | W38–10 | U | Y |
| Sat 9/18 | Charlotte at Georgia State | +4.5L9–20 | 62.5 | L9–20 | U | N |
| Fri 9/24 | Charlotte vs Middle Tennessee | -2.5W42–39 | 55.5 | W42–39 | O | Y |
| Sat 10/2 | Charlotte at Illinois | +10.0L14–24 | 54.0 | L14–24 | U | Y |
| Fri 10/8 | Charlotte at Florida International | -3.5W45–33 | 61.0 | W45–33 | O | Y |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Thu 10/21 | Charlotte vs Florida Atlantic | +6.5L9–38 | 58.0 | L9–38 | U | N |
| Sat 10/30 | Charlotte at Western Kentucky | +19.5L13–45 | 71.5 | L13–45 | U | N |
| Sat 11/6 | Charlotte vs Rice | -6.5W31–24 | 51.5 | W31–24 | O | Y |
| Sat 11/13 | Charlotte at Louisiana Tech | +7.0L32–42 | 58.0 | L32–42 | O | N |
| Sat 11/20 | Charlotte vs Marshall | +14.0L28–49 | 62.0 | L28–49 | O | N |
| Sat 11/27 | Charlotte at Old Dominion | +8.5L34–56 | 55.5 | L34–56 | O | N |
Illinois 2021 Schedule
Illinois's 2021 Schedule
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 8/28 | Illinois vs Nebraska | +6.5W30–22 | 52.0 | W30–22 | U | Y |
| Sat 9/4 | Illinois vs UTSA | -4.5L30–37 | 52.0 | L30–37 | O | N |
| Sat 9/11 | Illinois at Virginia | +10.5L14–42 | 57.0 | L14–42 | U | N |
| Fri 9/17 | Illinois vs Maryland | +7.0L17–20 | 61.5 | L17–20 | U | Y |
| Sat 9/25 | Illinois at Purdue | +10.5L9–13 | 53.5 | L9–13 | U | Y |
| Sat 10/2 | Illinois vs Charlotte | -10.0W24–14 | 54.0 | W24–14 | U | N |
| Sat 10/9 | Illinois vs Wisconsin | +12.5L0–24 | 42.0 | L0–24 | U | N |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Sat 10/23 | Illinois at Penn State | +24.5W20–18 | 46.0 | W20–18 | U | Y |
| Sat 10/30 | Illinois vs Rutgers | +1.5L14–20 | 41.5 | L14–20 | U | N |
| Sat 11/6 | Illinois at Minnesota | +14.5W14–6 | 44.5 | W14–6 | U | Y |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Sat 11/20 | Illinois at Iowa | +12.0L23–33 | 37.5 | L23–33 | O | Y |
| Sat 11/27 | Illinois vs Northwestern | -7.0W47–14 | 45.0 | W47–14 | O | Y |
Advanced Stats
Advanced Analytics Matchup
Matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense) ·
2021 season
Agreement Signals — When All Metrics Agree
Elite · 83.1% ATS
PPA + PPO + SR + Havoc
Split
Metrics disagree
Elite · 82.4% ATS
PPA + PPO + Havoc
3 Agree
→ Illinois
Elite · 73.9% ATS
PPA + Success Rate
Split
Metrics disagree
Individual Factors — Ranked by Predictive Strength
PPA Overall
Points added per play · Elite predictor
PPA Passing
Pass efficiency edge · Strong predictor
Havoc Total
Def. disruption rate · Strong predictor
TFLs, sacks, PBUs, forced fumbles — higher is better
Points Per Opp
Drive-finishing edge · Strong predictor
Success Rate
Play consistency edge · Solid predictor
Field Position
Avg start (lower=better) · Solid predictor
Avg yards from own endzone to average start — lower is better · longer bar = better field position
Advanced stats sourced from CFBD · 2021 season ·
Edges are matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense)
Power Ratings
Team Power Ratings
Overall · Offense · Defense ratings · Updated as season progresses
Power ratings updated throughout the season as results accumulate
Momentum Control (CSS)
Consecutive Scoring Sequences
Who builds scoring momentum?
Charlotte Edge
Charlotte +0.05
CSS Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 61.3% of games historically
Based on 5 games this season
Game Control (GC)
Win Probability Dominance
Who controls games start to finish?
Charlotte Edge
Charlotte +22.7
GC Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 75.9% of games historically
Based on 5 games this season
Actual Result
CSS Battle
Illinois
1 — 0 sequences
✗ Predicted incorrectly
GC Battle
Illinois
60.1 — 18.7 GC score
✗ Predicted incorrectly
Game Result
Illinois won by 10
✗ Model missed it
Spread Context
ATS Historical Context
Based on 2021–2025 backtest · FBS vs FBS · Regular season
Both metrics agree on Charlotte with a large edge. Historically, dominant teams like this are fully priced into the spread — the agreed-upon team covers just 50.2% of the time. The metrics predict game control better than they beat the number.
ATS data is informational only. Past cover rates do not guarantee future results.
Coaching Matchup
Charlotte
Will Healy #1
11–11 (50%)
· Yr 3 at school
OC
Mark Carney
Yr 1
#1
DC
Brandon Cooper
Yr 1
#1
Illinois
Bret Bielema #1
1–3 (25%)
· Yr 1 at school
OC
Tony Petersen
Yr 1
#1
DC
Ryan Walters
Yr 1
#1
About these metrics
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games. ✓
Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: Momentum Control is a great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: Game Control is another great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself ✓
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games. ✓
Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: Momentum Control is a great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: Game Control is another great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself ✓