Sat, Sep 9 2023
·
Week 2
·
🏟 FAU Stadium
Boca Raton, FL
·
Turf
·
30,000 cap
Ohio✈ 901 miSame TZ
Matchup Prediction
Toss-up — no clear edge
Neither metric shows a meaningful pre-game edge in this matchup.
Momentum Control
58.4%
—
Lean
Game Control
76%
Florida Atlantic wins
Strong
Vegas Spread
Florida Atlantic -3.5
O/U 61.5
William Hill (New Jersey)
Advanced Stats
All 4 factors agree → Ohio
· 83.1% ATS historically when all four align
↓ See full breakdown
Ohio 2023 Schedule
Ohio's 2023 Schedule
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 8/26 | Ohio at San Diego State | +2.0L13–20 | 48.5 | L13–20 | U | N |
| Sat 9/2 | Ohio vs Long Island University | -34.5W27–10 | 58.0 | W27–10 | U | N |
| Sat 9/9 | Ohio at Florida Atlantic | +3.5W17–10 | 61.5 | W17–10 | U | Y |
| Sat 9/16 | Ohio vs Iowa State | +1.5W10–7 | 42.0 | W10–7 | U | Y |
| Sat 9/23 | Ohio at Bowling Green | -13.0W38–7 | 45.0 | W38–7 | U | Y |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Sat 10/7 | Ohio vs Kent State | -24.5W42–17 | 45.5 | W42–17 | O | Y |
| Sat 10/14 | Ohio at Northern Illinois | -5.5L13–23 | 45.0 | L13–23 | U | N |
| Sat 10/21 | Ohio vs Western Michigan | -16.5W20–17 | 52.0 | W20–17 | U | N |
| Sat 10/28 | Ohio vs Miami (OH) | -7.5L16–30 | 39.0 | L16–30 | O | N |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Tue 11/7 | Ohio at Buffalo | -9.5W20–10 | 45.5 | W20–10 | U | Y |
| Wed 11/15 | Ohio vs Central Michigan | -11.5W34–20 | 48.5 | W34–20 | O | Y |
| Fri 11/24 | Ohio at Akron | -13.5W25–14 | 41.5 | W25–14 | U | N |
| Sat 12/16 | Ohio vs Georgia Southern | +1.5W41–21 | 48.5 | W41–21 | O | Y |
Florida Atlantic 2023 Schedule
Florida Atlantic's 2023 Schedule
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 9/2 | Florida Atlantic vs Monmouth | -26.5W42–20 | 56.0 | W42–20 | O | N |
| Sat 9/9 | Florida Atlantic vs Ohio | -3.5L10–17 | 61.5 | L10–17 | U | N |
| Sat 9/16 | Florida Atlantic at Clemson | +25.0L14–48 | 51.5 | L14–48 | O | N |
| Sat 9/23 | Florida Atlantic at Illinois | +16.0L17–23 | 45.5 | L17–23 | U | Y |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Sat 10/7 | Florida Atlantic vs Tulsa | -3.0W20–17 | 54.5 | W20–17 | U | N |
| Sat 10/14 | Florida Atlantic at South Florida | +3.0W56–14 | 61.0 | W56–14 | O | Y |
| Sat 10/21 | Florida Atlantic vs UTSA | +2.5L10–36 | 58.5 | L10–36 | U | N |
| Fri 10/27 | Florida Atlantic at Charlotte | -3.5W38–16 | 45.5 | W38–16 | O | Y |
| Sat 11/4 | Florida Atlantic at UAB | +1.0L42–45 | 59.5 | L42–45 | O | N |
| Sat 11/11 | Florida Atlantic vs East Carolina | -7.5L7–22 | 44.5 | L7–22 | U | N |
| Sat 11/18 | Florida Atlantic vs Tulane | +9.5L8–24 | 46.5 | L8–24 | U | N |
| Sat 11/25 | Florida Atlantic at Rice | +5.0L21–24 | 46.5 | L21–24 | U | Y |
Advanced Stats
Advanced Analytics Matchup
Matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense) ·
2023 season
Agreement Signals — When All Metrics Agree
Elite · 83.1% ATS
PPA + PPO + SR + Havoc
All 4 Agree
→ Ohio
Elite · 82.4% ATS
PPA + PPO + Havoc
3 Agree
→ Ohio
Elite · 73.9% ATS
PPA + Success Rate
Both Agree
→ Ohio
Individual Factors — Ranked by Predictive Strength
PPA Overall
Points added per play · Elite predictor
PPA Passing
Pass efficiency edge · Strong predictor
Havoc Total
Def. disruption rate · Strong predictor
TFLs, sacks, PBUs, forced fumbles — higher is better
Points Per Opp
Drive-finishing edge · Strong predictor
Success Rate
Play consistency edge · Solid predictor
Field Position
Avg start (lower=better) · Solid predictor
Avg yards from own endzone to average start — lower is better · longer bar = better field position
Advanced stats sourced from CFBD · 2023 season ·
Edges are matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense)
Power Ratings
Team Power Ratings
Overall · Offense · Defense ratings · Updated as season progresses
Power ratings updated throughout the season as results accumulate
Momentum Control (CSS)
Consecutive Scoring Sequences
Who builds scoring momentum?
Ohio Edge
Ohio +0.00
CSS Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 58.4% of games historically
Based on 0 games this season
Game Control (GC)
Win Probability Dominance
Who controls games start to finish?
Florida Atlantic Edge
Florida Atlantic +44.3
GC Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 76% of games historically
Based on 1 game this season
Spread Context
ATS Historical Context
Based on 2021–2025 backtest · FBS vs FBS · Regular season
Both metrics agree on Florida Atlantic with a large edge. Historically, dominant teams like this are fully priced into the spread — the agreed-upon team covers just 50.2% of the time. The metrics predict game control better than they beat the number.
ATS data is informational only. Past cover rates do not guarantee future results.
Coaching Matchup
Ohio
Tim Albin #1
16–14 (53%)
· Yr 3 at school
OC
Scott Isphording
Yr 2
#1
DC
Spence Nowinsky
Yr 2
#1
Florida Atlantic
Tom Herman #1
1–2 (33%)
· Yr 1 at school
OC
Charlie Frye
Yr 1
#1
DC
Roc Bellantoni
Yr 1
#1
About these metrics
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games. ✓
Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: CSS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: GS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself ✓
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games. ✓
Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: CSS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: GS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself ✓