Sat, Oct 22 2022
·
Week 8
·
🏟 Jerry Richardson Stadium
Charlotte, NC
·
Turf
·
15,314 cap
Florida International✈ 660 miSame TZ
Matchup Prediction
Metrics disagree on this matchup
Momentum Control favors Charlotte,
while Game Control favors Florida International.
Split signals historically show weaker predictive confidence — treat as a toss-up.
⚡ Split Signal — Metrics Disagree
Momentum Control
58.4%
Charlotte wins
Lean
Game Control
58.3%
Florida International wins
Lean
Vegas Spread
Charlotte -14
O/U 63.5
teamrankings
Advanced Stats
Advanced factors are split · No strong agreement signal
↓ See full breakdown
Florida International 2022 Schedule
Florida International's 2022 Schedule
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 9/1 | Florida International vs Bryant | -10.5W38–37 | 58.5 | W38–37 | O | N |
| Sat 9/10 | Florida International at Texas State | +13.5L12–41 | 62.5 | L12–41 | U | N |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Sat 9/24 | Florida International at Western Kentucky | +31.0L0–73 | 65.0 | L0–73 | O | N |
| Sat 10/1 | Florida International at New Mexico State | +15.0W21–7 | 54.0 | W21–7 | U | Y |
| Sat 10/8 | Florida International vs UConn | +5.5L12–33 | 46.5 | L12–33 | U | N |
| Fri 10/14 | Florida International vs UTSA | +33.0L10–30 | 64.0 | L10–30 | U | Y |
| Sat 10/22 | Florida International at Charlotte | +14.0W34–15 | 63.5 | W34–15 | U | Y |
| Fri 10/28 | Florida International vs Louisiana Tech | +6.5W42–34 | 57.0 | W42–34 | O | Y |
| Sat 11/5 | Florida International at North Texas | +21.0L14–52 | 63.5 | L14–52 | O | N |
| Sat 11/12 | Florida International vs Florida Atlantic | +15.0L7–52 | 54.5 | L7–52 | O | N |
| Sat 11/19 | Florida International at UTEP | +14.0L6–40 | 50.0 | L6–40 | U | N |
| Sat 11/26 | Florida International vs Middle Tennessee | +19.5L28–33 | 54.5 | L28–33 | O | Y |
Charlotte 2022 Schedule
Charlotte's 2022 Schedule
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 8/27 | Charlotte at Florida Atlantic | +7.0L13–43 | 60.0 | L13–43 | U | N |
| Fri 9/2 | Charlotte vs William & Mary | -4.5L24–41 | 52.0 | L24–41 | O | N |
| Sat 9/10 | Charlotte vs Maryland | +28.0L21–56 | 65.0 | L21–56 | O | N |
| Sat 9/17 | Charlotte at Georgia State | +19.5W42–41 | 64.0 | W42–41 | O | Y |
| Sat 9/24 | Charlotte at South Carolina | +23.5L20–56 | 66.5 | L20–56 | O | N |
| Sat 10/1 | Charlotte vs UTEP | +3.5L35–41 | 56.0 | L35–41 | O | N |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Sat 10/15 | Charlotte at UAB | +21.5L20–34 | 65.0 | L20–34 | U | Y |
| Sat 10/22 | Charlotte vs Florida International | -14.0L15–34 | 63.5 | L15–34 | U | N |
| Sat 10/29 | Charlotte at Rice | +15.0W56–23 | 61.0 | W56–23 | O | Y |
| Sat 11/5 | Charlotte vs Western Kentucky | +14.5L7–59 | 72.5 | L7–59 | U | N |
| Sat 11/12 | Charlotte at Middle Tennessee | +10.0L14–24 | 67.0 | L14–24 | U | Y |
| Sat 11/19 | Charlotte vs Louisiana Tech | +2.0W26–21 | 66.5 | W26–21 | U | Y |
Advanced Stats
Advanced Analytics Matchup
Matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense) ·
2022 season
Agreement Signals — When All Metrics Agree
Elite · 83.1% ATS
PPA + PPO + SR + Havoc
Split
Metrics disagree
Elite · 82.4% ATS
PPA + PPO + Havoc
Split
Metrics disagree
Elite · 73.9% ATS
PPA + Success Rate
Split
Metrics disagree
Individual Factors — Ranked by Predictive Strength
PPA Overall
Points added per play · Elite predictor
PPA Passing
Pass efficiency edge · Strong predictor
Havoc Total
Def. disruption rate · Strong predictor
TFLs, sacks, PBUs, forced fumbles — higher is better
Points Per Opp
Drive-finishing edge · Strong predictor
Success Rate
Play consistency edge · Solid predictor
Field Position
Avg start (lower=better) · Solid predictor
Avg yards from own endzone to average start — lower is better · longer bar = better field position
Advanced stats sourced from CFBD · 2022 season ·
Edges are matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense)
Power Ratings
Team Power Ratings
Overall · Offense · Defense ratings · Updated as season progresses
Power ratings updated throughout the season as results accumulate
Momentum Control (CSS)
Consecutive Scoring Sequences
Who builds scoring momentum?
Charlotte Edge
Charlotte +0.33
CSS Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 58.4% of games historically
Based on 6 games this season
Game Control (GC)
Win Probability Dominance
Who controls games start to finish?
Florida International Edge
Florida International +5.0
GC Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 58.3% of games historically
Based on 7 games this season
Spread Context
ATS Historical Context
Based on 2021–2025 backtest · FBS vs FBS · Regular season
CSS and GC disagree on this matchup. When the metrics split, historical cover rates are essentially random — treat this as a coin flip against the spread.
ATS data is informational only. Past cover rates do not guarantee future results.
Coaching Matchup
Florida International
Mike MacIntyre #1
0–0 (0%)
· Yr 1 at school
OC
David Yost
Yr 1
#1
DC
Jovan Dewitt
Yr 1
#1
Charlotte
Will Healy #1
14–17 (45%)
· Yr 4 at school
OC
Mark Carney
Yr 2
#1
DC
Greg Brown
Yr 1
#1
About these metrics
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games. ✓
Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: CSS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: GS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself ✓
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games. ✓
Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: CSS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: GS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself ✓