Matchup Prediction
Toss-up — no clear edge
Neither metric shows a meaningful pre-game edge in this matchup.
Momentum Control
58.4%
—
Lean
Game Control
75.9%
Marshall wins
Solid
Vegas Spread
Appalachian State -7
O/U 59.0
teamrankings
Advanced Stats
All 4 factors agree → App State
· 83.1% ATS historically when all four align
↓ See full breakdown
Marshall 2021 Schedule
Marshall's 2021 Schedule
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 9/4 | Marshall at Navy | -3.5W49–7 | 46.5 | W49–7 | O | Y |
| Sat 9/11 | Marshall vs North Carolina Central | -42.5W44–10 | 53.5 | W44–10 | O | N |
| Sat 9/18 | Marshall vs East Carolina | -11.0L38–42 | 58.5 | L38–42 | O | N |
| Thu 9/23 | Marshall at App State | +7.0L30–31 | 59.0 | L30–31 | O | Y |
| Sat 10/2 | Marshall at Middle Tennessee | -11.0L28–34 | 66.0 | L28–34 | U | N |
| Sat 10/9 | Marshall vs Old Dominion | -21.5W20–13 | 62.0 | W20–13 | U | N |
| Fri 10/15 | Marshall at North Texas | -11.0W49–21 | 66.5 | W49–21 | O | Y |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Sat 10/30 | Marshall vs Florida International | -21.5W38–0 | 64.0 | W38–0 | U | Y |
| Sat 11/6 | Marshall at Florida Atlantic | -1.0W28–13 | 58.0 | W28–13 | U | Y |
| Sat 11/13 | Marshall vs UAB | -4.5L14–21 | 55.5 | L14–21 | U | N |
| Sat 11/20 | Marshall at Charlotte | -14.0W49–28 | 62.0 | W49–28 | O | Y |
| Sat 11/27 | Marshall vs Western Kentucky | +1.0L21–53 | 75.5 | L21–53 | U | N |
| Sat 12/18 | Marshall vs Louisiana | +4.0L21–36 | 55.5 | L21–36 | O | N |
App State 2021 Schedule
App State's 2021 Schedule
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 9/2 | App State vs East Carolina | -9.0W33–19 | 55.5 | W33–19 | U | Y |
| Sat 9/11 | App State at Miami | +7.5L23–25 | 55.0 | L23–25 | U | Y |
| Sat 9/18 | App State vs Elon | -35.5W44–10 | 52.5 | W44–10 | O | N |
| Thu 9/23 | App State vs Marshall | -7.0W31–30 | 59.0 | W31–30 | O | N |
| Sat 10/2 | App State at Georgia State | -10.5W45–16 | 54.5 | W45–16 | O | Y |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Tue 10/12 | App State at Louisiana | -4.5L13–41 | 57.5 | L13–41 | U | N |
| Wed 10/20 | App State vs Coastal Carolina | +4.5W30–27 | 61.0 | W30–27 | U | Y |
| Sat 10/30 | App State vs UL Monroe | -26.5W59–28 | 57.5 | W59–28 | O | Y |
| Sat 11/6 | App State at Arkansas State | -21.5W48–14 | 67.5 | W48–14 | U | Y |
| Sat 11/13 | App State vs South Alabama | -21.5W31–7 | 51.5 | W31–7 | U | Y |
| Sat 11/20 | App State at Troy | -10.0W45–7 | 51.0 | W45–7 | O | Y |
| Sat 11/27 | App State vs Georgia Southern | -24.5W27–3 | 55.0 | W27–3 | U | N |
| Sat 12/4 | App State at Louisiana | -2.5L16–24 | 52.5 | L16–24 | U | N |
| Sat 12/18 | App State vs Western Kentucky | -3.0L38–59 | 67.0 | L38–59 | O | N |
Advanced Stats
Advanced Analytics Matchup
Matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense) ·
2021 season
Agreement Signals — When All Metrics Agree
Elite · 83.1% ATS
PPA + PPO + SR + Havoc
All 4 Agree
→ App State
Elite · 82.4% ATS
PPA + PPO + Havoc
3 Agree
→ App State
Elite · 73.9% ATS
PPA + Success Rate
Both Agree
→ App State
Individual Factors — Ranked by Predictive Strength
PPA Overall
Points added per play · Elite predictor
PPA Passing
Pass efficiency edge · Strong predictor
Havoc Total
Def. disruption rate · Strong predictor
TFLs, sacks, PBUs, forced fumbles — higher is better
Points Per Opp
Drive-finishing edge · Strong predictor
Success Rate
Play consistency edge · Solid predictor
Field Position
Avg start (lower=better) · Solid predictor
Avg yards from own endzone to average start — lower is better · longer bar = better field position
Advanced stats sourced from CFBD · 2021 season ·
Edges are matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense)
Power Ratings
Team Power Ratings
Overall · Offense · Defense ratings · Updated as season progresses
Power ratings updated throughout the season as results accumulate
Momentum Control (CSS)
Consecutive Scoring Sequences
Who builds scoring momentum?
Marshall +0.00
CSS Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 58.4% of games historically
Based on 2 games this season
Game Control (GC)
Win Probability Dominance
Who controls games start to finish?
Marshall Edge
Marshall +24.1
GC Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 75.9% of games historically
Based on 3 games this season
Actual Result
CSS Battle
Marshall
1 — 3 sequences
GC Battle
App State
43.1 — 33.1 GC score
✗ Predicted incorrectly
Game Result
App State won by 1
Spread Context
ATS Historical Context
Based on 2021–2025 backtest · FBS vs FBS · Regular season
CSS and GC disagree on this matchup. When the metrics split, historical cover rates are essentially random — treat this as a coin flip against the spread.
ATS data is informational only. Past cover rates do not guarantee future results.
Coaching Matchup
Marshall
Charles Huff #1
2–1 (67%)
· Yr 1 at school
OC
Tim Cramsey
Yr 1
#1
DC
Lance Guidry
Yr 1
#1
App State
Shawn Clark #1
12–4 (75%)
· Yr 2 at school
OC
Frank Ponce
Yr 1
#1
DC
Dale Jones
Yr 1
#1
About these metrics
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games. ✓
Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: Momentum Control is a great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: Game Control is another great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself ✓
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games. ✓
Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: Momentum Control is a great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: Game Control is another great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself ✓