Preseason projection — This game has not yet been played and 2026 in-season data is not yet available.
Edges are based on 2025 full-season performance.
Confidence will increase once in-season games are logged.
Matchup Prediction
NC State
has the edge in this matchup
Both Momentum Control (CSS) and Game Control metrics favor
NC State entering this game.
Momentum Control
58.4%
NC State wins
Lean
Game Control
76%
NC State wins
Strong
Advanced Stats
All 4 factors agree → NC State
· 83.1% ATS historically when all four align
↓ See full breakdown
Syracuse 2026 Schedule
Syracuse's 2026 Schedule
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 9/5 | Syracuse vs New Hampshire | -16 | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/12 | Syracuse vs California | +9.5 | — | — | — | — |
| Thu 9/17 | Syracuse at Pittsburgh | +19 | — | — | — | — |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Sat 10/3 | Syracuse at UConn | +11.5 | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/10 | Syracuse at Virginia | +16.5 | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/17 | Syracuse vs Louisville | +16.5 | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/24 | Syracuse at North Carolina | +7 | — | — | — | — |
| Fri 10/30 | Syracuse vs SMU | +20 | — | — | — | — |
| Fri 11/6 | Syracuse vs Clemson | +14 | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/14 | Syracuse at NC State | +16 | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/21 | Syracuse at Boston College | +3 | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/28 | Syracuse vs Notre Dame | +29.5 | — | — | — | — |
NC State 2026 Schedule
NC State's 2026 Schedule
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 8/29 | NC State vs Virginia | +3.5 | 54.5 | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/12 | NC State vs Richmond | -28.5 | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/19 | NC State at Vanderbilt | +4 | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/26 | NC State vs App State | -18.5 | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/3 | NC State vs Louisville | +3.5 | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/10 | NC State vs Wake Forest | -3 | — | — | — | — |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Fri 10/23 | NC State at Stanford | -11.5 | — | — | — | — |
| Fri 10/30 | NC State vs California | -4 | — | — | — | — |
| Fri 11/6 | NC State vs Duke | -3 | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/14 | NC State vs Syracuse | -16 | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/21 | NC State at Florida State | +4 | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/28 | NC State at North Carolina | -6.5 | — | — | — | — |
Advanced Stats
Advanced Analytics Matchup
Matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense) ·
2025 season (prior year)
Agreement Signals — When All Metrics Agree
Elite · 83.1% ATS
PPA + PPO + SR + Havoc
All 4 Agree
→ NC State
Elite · 82.4% ATS
PPA + PPO + Havoc
3 Agree
→ NC State
Elite · 73.9% ATS
PPA + Success Rate
Both Agree
→ NC State
Individual Factors — Ranked by Predictive Strength
PPA Overall
Points added per play · Elite predictor
PPA Passing
Pass efficiency edge · Strong predictor
Havoc Total
Def. disruption rate · Strong predictor
TFLs, sacks, PBUs, forced fumbles — higher is better
Points Per Opp
Drive-finishing edge · Strong predictor
Success Rate
Play consistency edge · Solid predictor
Field Position
Avg start (lower=better) · Solid predictor
Avg yards from own endzone to average start — lower is better · longer bar = better field position
Advanced stats sourced from CFBD · 2025 season (prior year — 2026 data not yet available) ·
Edges are matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense)
Power Ratings
Team Power Ratings
Overall · Offense · Defense ratings · Updated as season progresses
Power ratings updated throughout the season as results accumulate
Momentum Control (CSS)
Consecutive Scoring Sequences
Who builds scoring momentum?
NC State Edge
NC State +0.56
CSS Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 58.4% of games historically
Based on 2025 full season · preseason estimate
Game Control (GC)
Win Probability Dominance
Who controls games start to finish?
NC State Edge
NC State +26.8
GC Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 76% of games historically
Based on 2025 full season · preseason estimate
Coaching Matchup
Syracuse
Fran Brown #68
13–12 (52%)
· Yr 3 at school
OC
Jeff Nixon
Yr 2
#67
DC
Vince Kehres
Yr 1
#5
NC State
Dave Doeren #62
95–70 (58%)
· Yr 14 at school
OC
Kurt Roper
Yr 2
#43
DC
D. J. Eliot
Yr 2
#119
About these metrics
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games. ✓
Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: CSS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: GS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself ✓
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games. ✓
Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: CSS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: GS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself ✓