Southern at Houston Week 2 College Football Matchup Southern at Houston Matchup - Week 2
Sat, Sep 12 2026 · Week 2 · 🏟 John O'Quinn Field at TDECU Stadium Houston, TX · Turf · 40,000 cap
Southern✈ 254 miSame TZ
Away
VS
Home
Preseason projection — This game has not yet been played and 2026 in-season data is not yet available. Edges are based on 2025 full-season performance. Confidence will increase once in-season games are logged.
📊 Punt & Rally Projection
Southern
24
Houston
34
P&R Line Houston -10.5
P&R Total O/U 57.5
Confidence 55 Early Season
Matchup Prediction
Toss-up — no clear edge
Neither metric shows a meaningful pre-game edge in this matchup.
Momentum Control
58.4%
Lean
Game Control
76%
Houston wins
Strong
🏠 Houston 2nd straight Home Game
Southern 2026 Schedule
Southern's 2026 Schedule
DateMatchupSpreadTotalResultO/UCover
— Bye Week —
Sat 9/12Southern at Houston+10.5
Houston 2026 Schedule
Houston's 2026 Schedule
DateMatchupSpreadTotalResultO/UCover
Sat 9/5Houston vs Oregon State-21.5
Sat 9/12Houston vs Southern-29.5
Sat 9/19Houston at Texas Tech+22.5
Sat 9/26Houston at Georgia Southern-13.5
Sat 10/3Houston vs UCF-9
Sat 10/10Houston at Kansas State+1.5
Sat 10/17Houston vs Oklahoma State-5.5
Sat 10/24Houston at Utah+4.5
— Bye Week —
Sat 11/7Houston vs Cincinnati-8.5
Sat 11/14Houston at Colorado-9.5
Sat 11/21Houston at West Virginia-8
Sat 11/28Houston vs Baylor-8
Momentum Control (CSS)
Consecutive Scoring Sequences Who builds scoring momentum? Southern Edge
Avg sequences created per game
Southern
0.00
Houston #23
1.42
Avg sequences allowed per game (lower is better)
Southern
0.00
Houston #70
1.00
Southern +0.00
CSS Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 58.4% of games historically
Based on 2025 full season · preseason estimate
Game Control (GC)
Win Probability Dominance Who controls games start to finish? Houston Edge
Avg GC score per game (offense)
Southern #139
2.6
Houston #47
45.9
Avg GC score allowed per game (lower is better)
Southern #140
95.9
Houston #61
36.2
Houston +43.3
GC Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 76% of games historically
Based on 2025 full season · preseason estimate
About these metrics
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games.

Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: Momentum Control is a great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set.

Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: Game Control is another great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set.

Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself