Sat, Oct 1 2022
·
Week 5
·
🏟 Waldo Stadium
Kalamazoo, MI
·
Turf
·
30,200 cap
New Hampshire✈ 745 miSame TZ
Preseason projection — This game has not yet been played and 2022 in-season data is not yet available.
Edges are based on 2021 full-season performance.
Confidence will increase once in-season games are logged.
Matchup Prediction
Toss-up — no clear edge
Neither metric shows a meaningful pre-game edge in this matchup.
Momentum Control
58.4%
—
Lean
Game Control
76%
Western Michigan wins
Strong
Vegas Spread
Western Michigan -15
O/U 52.5
consensus
New Hampshire 2022 Schedule
New Hampshire's 2022 Schedule
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Sat 10/1 | New Hampshire at Western Michigan | +15.0L7–44 | 52.5 | L7–44 | U | N |
Western Michigan 2022 Schedule
Western Michigan's 2022 Schedule
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 9/2 | Western Michigan at Michigan State | +22.0L13–35 | 54.5 | L13–35 | U | Y |
| Sat 9/10 | Western Michigan at Ball State | -6.5W37–30 | 51.5 | W37–30 | O | Y |
| Sat 9/17 | Western Michigan vs Pittsburgh | +10.0L13–34 | 46.0 | L13–34 | O | N |
| Sat 9/24 | Western Michigan at San José State | +6.5L6–34 | 49.0 | L6–34 | U | N |
| Sat 10/1 | Western Michigan vs New Hampshire | -15.0W44–7 | 52.5 | W44–7 | U | Y |
| Sat 10/8 | Western Michigan vs Eastern Michigan | -4.5L23–45 | 55.5 | L23–45 | O | N |
| Sat 10/15 | Western Michigan vs Ohio | -2.0L14–33 | 61.5 | L14–33 | U | N |
| Sat 10/22 | Western Michigan at Miami (OH) | +7.0W16–10 | 44.0 | W16–10 | U | Y |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Wed 11/2 | Western Michigan at Bowling Green | +5.0L9–13 | 48.0 | L9–13 | U | Y |
| Wed 11/9 | Western Michigan vs Northern Illinois | +1.0L21–24 | 49.0 | L21–24 | U | N |
| Wed 11/16 | Western Michigan at Central Michigan | +10.0W12–10 | 49.0 | W12–10 | U | Y |
| Fri 11/25 | Western Michigan vs Toledo | +8.5W20–14 | 50.5 | W20–14 | U | Y |
Momentum Control (CSS)
Consecutive Scoring Sequences
Who builds scoring momentum?
New Hampshire Edge
New Hampshire +0.00
CSS Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 58.4% of games historically
Based on 2021 full season · preseason estimate
Game Control (GC)
Win Probability Dominance
Who controls games start to finish?
Western Michigan Edge
Western Michigan +60.5
GC Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 76% of games historically
Based on 2021 full season · preseason estimate
About these metrics
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games. ✓
Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: CSS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: GS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself ✓
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games. ✓
Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: CSS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: GS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself ✓