Wyoming at Fresno State Week 13 College Football Matchup Wyoming at Fresno State Matchup - Week 13
Sat, Nov 26 2022 · Week 13 · 🏟 Bulldog Stadium Fresno, CA · Turf · 41,031 cap
Wyoming✈ 821 mi-1 hr TZ
Away
0 30
Final
📊 Punt & Rally Projection
Wyoming
16
Fresno State
33
P&R Line Fresno State -16.5
P&R Total O/U 48.5
Confidence 90 High
Vegas Fresno State -15 · O/U 50.5
Matchup Prediction
Fresno State has the edge in this matchup
Both Momentum Control (CSS) and Game Control metrics favor Fresno State entering this game.
Momentum Control
71.6%
Fresno State wins
Solid
Game Control
67.1%
Fresno State wins
Solid
Vegas Spread
Fresno State -15
O/U 50.5
teamrankings
Advanced Stats
All 4 factors agree → Fresno State · 83.1% ATS historically when all four align
↓ See full breakdown
Wyoming 2022 Schedule
Wyoming's 2022 Schedule
DateMatchupSpreadTotalResultO/UCover
Sat 8/27Wyoming at Illinois+14.0L6–3842.5L6–38ON
Sat 9/3Wyoming vs Tulsa+6.5W40–3747.0W40–37OY
Sat 9/10Wyoming vs Northern Colorado-23.5W33–1054.5W33–10UN
Fri 9/16Wyoming vs Air Force+16.5W17–1447.0W17–14UY
Sat 9/24Wyoming at BYU+21.5L24–3850.0L24–38OY
Sat 10/1Wyoming vs San José State+2.5L16–3342.5L16–33ON
Sat 10/8Wyoming at New Mexico-3.0W27–1437.0W27–14OY
— Bye Week —
Sat 10/22Wyoming vs Utah State-5.0W28–1444.5W28–14UY
Sat 10/29Wyoming at Hawai'i-11.5W27–2050.5W27–20UN
— Bye Week —
Sat 11/12Wyoming at Colorado State-8.5W14–1342.5W14–13UN
Sat 11/19Wyoming vs Boise State+14.5L17–2044.5L17–20UY
Fri 11/25Wyoming at Fresno State+15.0L0–3050.5L0–30UN
Fri 12/30Wyoming vs Ohio+3.0L27–3043.0L27–30OY
Fresno State 2022 Schedule
Fresno State's 2022 Schedule
DateMatchupSpreadTotalResultO/UCover
Thu 9/1Fresno State vs Cal Poly-42.5W35–763.0W35–7UN
Sat 9/10Fresno State vs Oregon State-1.0L32–3559.0L32–35ON
Sat 9/17Fresno State at USC+11.0L17–4571.0L17–45UN
— Bye Week —
Sat 10/1Fresno State at UConn-23.5L14–1951.0L14–19UN
Sat 10/8Fresno State at Boise State+9.0L20–4045.0L20–40ON
Sat 10/15Fresno State vs San José State+7.0W17–1047.0W17–10UY
Sat 10/22Fresno State at New Mexico-9.5W41–940.0W41–9OY
Sat 10/29Fresno State vs San Diego State-10.0W32–2843.5W32–28ON
Sat 11/5Fresno State vs Hawai'i-27.0W55–1362.0W55–13OY
Fri 11/11Fresno State at UNLV-9.0W37–3061.5W37–30ON
Sat 11/19Fresno State at Nevada-22.5W41–1454.0W41–14OY
Fri 11/25Fresno State vs Wyoming-15.0W30–050.5W30–0UY
Sat 12/3Fresno State at Boise State+3.0W28–1654.5W28–16UY
Sat 12/17Fresno State vs Washington State-5.5W29–654.0W29–6UY
Advanced Stats
Advanced Analytics Matchup
Matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense) · 2022 season
Fresno State PPA Edge
Agreement Signals — When All Metrics Agree
Elite · 83.1% ATS
PPA + PPO + SR + Havoc
All 4 Agree
→ Fresno State
Elite · 82.4% ATS
PPA + PPO + Havoc
3 Agree
→ Fresno State
Elite · 73.9% ATS
PPA + Success Rate
Both Agree
→ Fresno State
Individual Factors — Ranked by Predictive Strength
PPA Overall
Points added per play · Elite predictor
Wyoming
+0.266
Fresno State
+0.406
Fresno State Edge
PPA Passing
Pass efficiency edge · Strong predictor
Wyoming
+0.215
Fresno State
+0.547
Fresno State Edge
Havoc Total
Def. disruption rate · Strong predictor
Wyoming
0.142
Fresno State
0.182
TFLs, sacks, PBUs, forced fumbles — higher is better
Fresno State Edge
Points Per Opp
Drive-finishing edge · Strong predictor
Wyoming
+6.937
Fresno State
+8.123
Fresno State Edge
Success Rate
Play consistency edge · Solid predictor
Wyoming
+0.797
Fresno State
+0.882
Fresno State Edge
Field Position
Avg start (lower=better) · Solid predictor
Wyoming
71.5
Fresno State
69.3
Avg yards from own endzone to average start — lower is better · longer bar = better field position
Fresno State Edge
Advanced stats sourced from CFBD · 2022 season · Edges are matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense)
Power Ratings
Team Power Ratings
Overall · Offense · Defense ratings · Updated as season progresses
Fresno State Rated Higher
Overall Power Rating
Wyoming
-10.7
Fresno State
2.4
Offense Rating
Wyoming
13.3
Fresno State
15.1
Defense Rating (lower = better defense)
Wyoming
24.0
Fresno State
12.8
Power ratings updated throughout the season as results accumulate
Momentum Control (CSS)
Consecutive Scoring Sequences Who builds scoring momentum? Fresno State Edge
Avg sequences created per game
Wyoming #132
0.30
Fresno State #43
1.70
Avg sequences allowed per game (lower is better)
Wyoming #55
0.90
Fresno State #48
1.00
Fresno State +1.40
CSS Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 71.6% of games historically
Based on 10 games this season
Game Control (GC)
Win Probability Dominance Who controls games start to finish? Fresno State Edge
Avg GC score per game (offense)
Wyoming #1
36.9
Fresno State #1
55.5
Avg GC score allowed per game (lower is better)
Wyoming #87
44.1
Fresno State #36
33.1
Fresno State +18.7
GC Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 67.1% of games historically
Based on 11 games this season
Spread Context
ATS Historical Context
Based on 2021–2025 backtest · FBS vs FBS · Regular season

Both metrics agree on Fresno State with a moderate edge in both. This is the strongest ATS signal in our backtest: teams in this situation have covered 55.8% of the time (n=113).

ATS data is informational only. Past cover rates do not guarantee future results.

Coaching Matchup
Wyoming
Craig Bohl #1
45–50 (47%) · Yr 9 at school
OC Tim Polasek Yr 2 #1
DC Jay Sawvel Yr 2 #1
Staff Rating
0.00 #1
Fresno State
Jeff Tedford #1
26–14 (65%) · Yr 1 at school
OC Kirby Moore Yr 1 #1
DC Kevin Coyle Yr 1 #1
Staff Rating
0.00 #1
About these metrics
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games.

Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: CSS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set.

Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: GS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set.

Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself