Fri, Sep 2 2022
·
Week 1
·
🏟 Bulldog Stadium
Fresno, CA
·
Turf
·
41,031 cap
Cal Poly✈ 116 miSame TZ
Preseason projection — This game has not yet been played and 2022 in-season data is not yet available.
Edges are based on 2021 full-season performance.
Confidence will increase once in-season games are logged.
Matchup Prediction
Toss-up — no clear edge
Neither metric shows a meaningful pre-game edge in this matchup.
Momentum Control
58.4%
—
Lean
Game Control
76%
Fresno State wins
Strong
Vegas Spread
Fresno State -42.5
O/U 63.0
consensus
Cal Poly 2022 Schedule
Cal Poly's 2022 Schedule
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 9/1 | Cal Poly at Fresno State | +42.5L7–35 | 63.0 | L7–35 | U | Y |
Fresno State 2022 Schedule
Fresno State's 2022 Schedule
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 9/1 | Fresno State vs Cal Poly | -42.5W35–7 | 63.0 | W35–7 | U | N |
| Sat 9/10 | Fresno State vs Oregon State | -1.0L32–35 | 59.0 | L32–35 | O | N |
| Sat 9/17 | Fresno State at USC | +11.0L17–45 | 71.0 | L17–45 | U | N |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Sat 10/1 | Fresno State at UConn | -23.5L14–19 | 51.0 | L14–19 | U | N |
| Sat 10/8 | Fresno State at Boise State | +9.0L20–40 | 45.0 | L20–40 | O | N |
| Sat 10/15 | Fresno State vs San José State | +7.0W17–10 | 47.0 | W17–10 | U | Y |
| Sat 10/22 | Fresno State at New Mexico | -9.5W41–9 | 40.0 | W41–9 | O | Y |
| Sat 10/29 | Fresno State vs San Diego State | -10.0W32–28 | 43.5 | W32–28 | O | N |
| Sat 11/5 | Fresno State vs Hawai'i | -27.0W55–13 | 62.0 | W55–13 | O | Y |
| Fri 11/11 | Fresno State at UNLV | -9.0W37–30 | 61.5 | W37–30 | O | N |
| Sat 11/19 | Fresno State at Nevada | -22.5W41–14 | 54.0 | W41–14 | O | Y |
| Fri 11/25 | Fresno State vs Wyoming | -15.0W30–0 | 50.5 | W30–0 | U | Y |
| Sat 12/3 | Fresno State at Boise State | +3.0W28–16 | 54.5 | W28–16 | U | Y |
| Sat 12/17 | Fresno State vs Washington State | -5.5W29–6 | 54.0 | W29–6 | U | Y |
Momentum Control (CSS)
Consecutive Scoring Sequences
Who builds scoring momentum?
Cal Poly Edge
Cal Poly +0.00
CSS Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 58.4% of games historically
Based on 2021 full season · preseason estimate
Game Control (GC)
Win Probability Dominance
Who controls games start to finish?
Fresno State Edge
Fresno State +68.2
GC Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 76% of games historically
Based on 2021 full season · preseason estimate
About these metrics
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games. ✓
Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: Momentum Control is a great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: Game Control is another great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself ✓
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games. ✓
Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: Momentum Control is a great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: Game Control is another great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself ✓