Matchup Prediction
Oklahoma
has the edge in this matchup
Both Momentum Control (CSS) and Game Control metrics favor
Oklahoma entering this game.
Momentum Control
73.7%
Oklahoma wins
Solid
Game Control
64.9%
Oklahoma wins
Lean
Vegas Spread
Oklahoma -10.5
O/U 65.5
teamrankings
Advanced Stats
All 4 factors agree → Oklahoma
· 83.1% ATS historically when all four align
↓ See full breakdown
Oklahoma 2022 Schedule
Oklahoma's 2022 Schedule
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 9/3 | Oklahoma vs UTEP | -31.0W45–13 | 58.0 | W45–13 | U | Y |
| Sat 9/10 | Oklahoma vs Kent State | -33.5W33–3 | 73.0 | W33–3 | U | N |
| Sat 9/17 | Oklahoma at Nebraska | -10.5W49–14 | 65.5 | W49–14 | U | Y |
| Sat 9/24 | Oklahoma vs Kansas State | -13.5L34–41 | 53.0 | L34–41 | O | N |
| Sat 10/1 | Oklahoma at TCU | -5.0L24–55 | 69.5 | L24–55 | O | N |
| Sat 10/8 | Oklahoma vs Texas | +7.5L0–49 | 65.0 | L0–49 | U | N |
| Sat 10/15 | Oklahoma vs Kansas | -10.5W52–42 | 66.0 | W52–42 | O | N |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Sat 10/29 | Oklahoma at Iowa State | -1.5W27–13 | 58.0 | W27–13 | U | Y |
| Sat 11/5 | Oklahoma vs Baylor | -3.0L35–38 | 61.5 | L35–38 | O | N |
| Sat 11/12 | Oklahoma at West Virginia | -8.5L20–23 | 68.5 | L20–23 | U | N |
| Sat 11/19 | Oklahoma vs Oklahoma State | -7.0W28–13 | 67.5 | W28–13 | U | Y |
| Sat 11/26 | Oklahoma at Texas Tech | -2.0L48–51 | 65.5 | L48–51 | O | N |
| Thu 12/29 | Oklahoma vs Florida State | +10.5L32–35 | 67.0 | L32–35 | U | Y |
Nebraska 2022 Schedule
Nebraska's 2022 Schedule
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 8/27 | Nebraska vs Northwestern | -12.0L28–31 | 52.5 | L28–31 | O | N |
| Sat 9/3 | Nebraska vs North Dakota | -28.5W38–17 | 62.5 | W38–17 | U | N |
| Sat 9/10 | Nebraska vs Georgia Southern | -23.5L42–45 | 64.0 | L42–45 | O | N |
| Sat 9/17 | Nebraska vs Oklahoma | +10.5L14–49 | 65.5 | L14–49 | U | N |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Sat 10/1 | Nebraska vs Indiana | -6.5W35–21 | 62.0 | W35–21 | U | Y |
| Fri 10/7 | Nebraska at Rutgers | -3.0W14–13 | 50.5 | W14–13 | U | N |
| Sat 10/15 | Nebraska at Purdue | +14.0L37–43 | 56.0 | L37–43 | O | Y |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Sat 10/29 | Nebraska vs Illinois | +7.5L9–26 | 50.5 | L9–26 | U | N |
| Sat 11/5 | Nebraska vs Minnesota | +14.5L13–20 | 44.5 | L13–20 | U | Y |
| Sat 11/12 | Nebraska at Michigan | +30.5L3–34 | 49.5 | L3–34 | U | N |
| Sat 11/19 | Nebraska vs Wisconsin | +10.0L14–15 | 40.5 | L14–15 | U | Y |
| Fri 11/25 | Nebraska at Iowa | +10.5W24–17 | 38.0 | W24–17 | O | Y |
Advanced Stats
Advanced Analytics Matchup
Matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense) ·
2022 season
Agreement Signals — When All Metrics Agree
Elite · 83.1% ATS
PPA + PPO + SR + Havoc
All 4 Agree
→ Oklahoma
Elite · 82.4% ATS
PPA + PPO + Havoc
3 Agree
→ Oklahoma
Elite · 73.9% ATS
PPA + Success Rate
Both Agree
→ Oklahoma
Individual Factors — Ranked by Predictive Strength
PPA Overall
Points added per play · Elite predictor
PPA Passing
Pass efficiency edge · Strong predictor
Havoc Total
Def. disruption rate · Strong predictor
TFLs, sacks, PBUs, forced fumbles — higher is better
Points Per Opp
Drive-finishing edge · Strong predictor
Success Rate
Play consistency edge · Solid predictor
Field Position
Avg start (lower=better) · Solid predictor
Avg yards from own endzone to average start — lower is better · longer bar = better field position
Advanced stats sourced from CFBD · 2022 season ·
Edges are matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense)
Power Ratings
Team Power Ratings
Overall · Offense · Defense ratings · Updated as season progresses
Power ratings updated throughout the season as results accumulate
Momentum Control (CSS)
Consecutive Scoring Sequences
Who builds scoring momentum?
Oklahoma Edge
Oklahoma +1.00
CSS Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 73.7% of games historically
Based on 2 games this season
Game Control (GC)
Win Probability Dominance
Who controls games start to finish?
Oklahoma Edge
Oklahoma +16.4
GC Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 64.9% of games historically
Based on 3 games this season
Spread Context
ATS Historical Context
Based on 2021–2025 backtest · FBS vs FBS · Regular season
Both metrics agree on Oklahoma with a moderate edge in both. This is the strongest ATS signal in our backtest: teams in this situation have covered 55.8% of the time (n=113).
ATS data is informational only. Past cover rates do not guarantee future results.
Coaching Matchup
Oklahoma
Brent Venables #1
0–0 (0%)
· Yr 1 at school
OC
Jeff Lebby
Yr 1
#1
DC
Todd Bates
Yr 1
#1
Nebraska
Scott Frost #1
15–29 (34%)
· Yr 5 at school
OC
Mark Whipple
Yr 1
#1
DC
Erik Chinander
Yr 2
#1
About these metrics
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games. ✓
Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: CSS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: GS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself ✓
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games. ✓
Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: CSS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: GS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself ✓