Sat, Oct 24 2026
·
Week 8
·
🏟 Kelly/Shorts Stadium
Mount Pleasant, MI
·
Turf
·
32,885 cap
Miami (OH)✈ 280 miSame TZ
Preseason projection — This game has not yet been played and 2026 in-season data is not yet available.
Edges are based on 2025 full-season performance.
Confidence will increase once in-season games are logged.
Matchup Prediction
Metrics disagree on this matchup
Momentum Control favors Miami (OH),
while Game Control favors Central Michigan.
Split signals historically show weaker predictive confidence — treat as a toss-up.
⚡ Split Signal — Metrics Disagree
Momentum Control
61.3%
Miami (OH) wins
Lean
Game Control
58.6%
Central Michigan wins
Lean
Advanced Stats
PPA + Success Rate agree → Central Michigan
· 73.9% ATS historically
↓ See full breakdown
Miami (OH) 2026 Schedule
Miami (OH)'s 2026 Schedule
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 9/5 | Miami (OH) at Pittsburgh | +12.5 | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/12 | Miami (OH) vs Holy Cross | -22 | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/19 | Miami (OH) at Cincinnati | +5.5 | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/26 | Miami (OH) vs UConn | -0 | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/3 | Miami (OH) vs Bowling Green | -12.5 | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/10 | Miami (OH) at Massachusetts | -28 | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/17 | Miami (OH) vs Akron | -14 | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/24 | Miami (OH) at Central Michigan | -3 | — | — | — | — |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Tue 11/3 | Miami (OH) vs Buffalo | -10.5 | — | — | — | — |
| Tue 11/10 | Miami (OH) vs Ohio | -8.5 | — | — | — | — |
| Tue 11/17 | Miami (OH) at Kent State | -14 | — | — | — | — |
| Tue 11/24 | Miami (OH) at Western Michigan | +0.5 | — | — | — | — |
Central Michigan 2026 Schedule
Central Michigan's 2026 Schedule
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 9/5 | Central Michigan at New Mexico | +10.5 | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/12 | Central Michigan vs Colgate | -16.5 | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/19 | Central Michigan vs Wyoming | -6.5 | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/26 | Central Michigan at Miami | +29.5 | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/3 | Central Michigan vs Akron | -8.5 | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/10 | Central Michigan at Ohio | +2 | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/17 | Central Michigan vs Western Michigan | +1 | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/24 | Central Michigan vs Miami (OH) | +3 | — | — | — | — |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Wed 11/4 | Central Michigan at Eastern Michigan | -2.5 | — | — | — | — |
| Wed 11/11 | Central Michigan vs Sacramento State | -0.5 | — | — | — | — |
| Wed 11/18 | Central Michigan at Buffalo | +0 | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/28 | Central Michigan at Ball State | -13 | — | — | — | — |
Advanced Stats
Advanced Analytics Matchup
Matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense) ·
2025 season (prior year)
Agreement Signals — When All Metrics Agree
Elite · 83.1% ATS
PPA + PPO + SR + Havoc
Split
Metrics disagree
Elite · 82.4% ATS
PPA + PPO + Havoc
Split
Metrics disagree
Elite · 73.9% ATS
PPA + Success Rate
Both Agree
→ Central Michigan
Individual Factors — Ranked by Predictive Strength
PPA Overall
Points added per play · Elite predictor
PPA Passing
Pass efficiency edge · Strong predictor
Havoc Total
Def. disruption rate · Strong predictor
TFLs, sacks, PBUs, forced fumbles — higher is better
Points Per Opp
Drive-finishing edge · Strong predictor
Success Rate
Play consistency edge · Solid predictor
Field Position
Avg start (lower=better) · Solid predictor
Avg yards from own endzone to average start — lower is better · longer bar = better field position
Advanced stats sourced from CFBD · 2025 season (prior year — 2026 data not yet available) ·
Edges are matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense)
Power Ratings
Team Power Ratings
Overall · Offense · Defense ratings · Updated as season progresses
Power ratings updated throughout the season as results accumulate
Momentum Control (CSS)
Consecutive Scoring Sequences
Who builds scoring momentum?
Miami (OH) Edge
Miami (OH) +0.17
CSS Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 61.3% of games historically
Based on 2025 full season · preseason estimate
Game Control (GC)
Win Probability Dominance
Who controls games start to finish?
Central Michigan Edge
Central Michigan +6.9
GC Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 58.6% of games historically
Based on 2025 full season · preseason estimate
Coaching Matchup
Miami (OH)
Chuck Martin #31
72–74 (49%)
· Yr 13 at school
OC
Gus Ragland
Yr 1
#67
DC
Bill Brechin
Yr 3
#8
Central Michigan
Matt Drinkall #96
7–6 (54%)
· Yr 2 at school
OC
Jim Chapin
Yr 2
#109
DC
Sean Cronin
Yr 2
#98
About these metrics
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games. ✓
Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: Momentum Control is a great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: Game Control is another great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself ✓
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games. ✓
Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: Momentum Control is a great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: Game Control is another great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself ✓