Wed, Nov 4 2026
·
Week 10
·
🏟 Rynearson Stadium
Ypsilanti, MI
·
Turf
·
30,200 cap
Central Michigan✈ 107 miSame TZ
Preseason projection — This game has not yet been played and 2026 in-season data is not yet available.
Edges are based on 2025 full-season performance.
Confidence will increase once in-season games are logged.
Matchup Prediction
Central Michigan
has the edge in this matchup
Both Momentum Control (CSS) and Game Control metrics favor
Central Michigan entering this game.
Momentum Control
61.3%
Central Michigan wins
Lean
Game Control
64.9%
Central Michigan wins
Lean
Advanced Stats
All 4 factors agree → Central Michigan
· 83.1% ATS historically when all four align
↓ See full breakdown
Central Michigan 2026 Schedule
Central Michigan's 2026 Schedule
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 9/5 | Central Michigan at New Mexico | +10.5 | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/12 | Central Michigan vs Colgate | -16.5 | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/19 | Central Michigan vs Wyoming | -6.5 | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/26 | Central Michigan at Miami | +29.5 | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/3 | Central Michigan vs Akron | -8.5 | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/10 | Central Michigan at Ohio | +2 | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/17 | Central Michigan vs Western Michigan | +1 | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/24 | Central Michigan vs Miami (OH) | +3 | — | — | — | — |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Wed 11/4 | Central Michigan at Eastern Michigan | -2.5 | — | — | — | — |
| Wed 11/11 | Central Michigan vs Sacramento State | -0.5 | — | — | — | — |
| Wed 11/18 | Central Michigan at Buffalo | +0 | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/28 | Central Michigan at Ball State | -13 | — | — | — | — |
Eastern Michigan 2026 Schedule
Eastern Michigan's 2026 Schedule
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 8/29 | Eastern Michigan vs Sacramento State | +4 | — | — | — | — |
| Fri 9/4 | Eastern Michigan vs San José State | -8 | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/12 | Eastern Michigan at Michigan State | +11.5 | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/19 | Eastern Michigan at Wisconsin | +12 | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/26 | Eastern Michigan vs Lindenwood | -12 | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/3 | Eastern Michigan at Massachusetts | -18 | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/10 | Eastern Michigan at Akron | +1 | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/17 | Eastern Michigan vs Toledo | +13 | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/24 | Eastern Michigan at Ohio | +7 | — | — | — | — |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Wed 11/4 | Eastern Michigan vs Central Michigan | +2.5 | — | — | — | — |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Tue 11/17 | Eastern Michigan at Western Michigan | +11 | — | — | — | — |
| Tue 11/24 | Eastern Michigan vs Kent State | -9 | — | — | — | — |
Advanced Stats
Advanced Analytics Matchup
Matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense) ·
2025 season (prior year)
Agreement Signals — When All Metrics Agree
Elite · 83.1% ATS
PPA + PPO + SR + Havoc
All 4 Agree
→ Central Michigan
Elite · 82.4% ATS
PPA + PPO + Havoc
3 Agree
→ Central Michigan
Elite · 73.9% ATS
PPA + Success Rate
Both Agree
→ Central Michigan
Individual Factors — Ranked by Predictive Strength
PPA Overall
Points added per play · Elite predictor
PPA Passing
Pass efficiency edge · Strong predictor
Havoc Total
Def. disruption rate · Strong predictor
TFLs, sacks, PBUs, forced fumbles — higher is better
Points Per Opp
Drive-finishing edge · Strong predictor
Success Rate
Play consistency edge · Solid predictor
Field Position
Avg start (lower=better) · Solid predictor
Avg yards from own endzone to average start — lower is better · longer bar = better field position
Advanced stats sourced from CFBD · 2025 season (prior year — 2026 data not yet available) ·
Edges are matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense)
Power Ratings
Team Power Ratings
Overall · Offense · Defense ratings · Updated as season progresses
Power ratings updated throughout the season as results accumulate
Momentum Control (CSS)
Consecutive Scoring Sequences
Who builds scoring momentum?
Central Michigan Edge
Central Michigan +0.56
CSS Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 61.3% of games historically
Based on 2025 full season · preseason estimate
Game Control (GC)
Win Probability Dominance
Who controls games start to finish?
Central Michigan Edge
Central Michigan +18.2
GC Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 64.9% of games historically
Based on 2025 full season · preseason estimate
Coaching Matchup
Central Michigan
Matt Drinkall #96
7–6 (54%)
· Yr 2 at school
OC
Jim Chapin
Yr 2
#109
DC
Sean Cronin
Yr 2
#98
Eastern Michigan
Chris Creighton #128
61–83 (43%)
· Yr 13 at school
OC
Mike Piatkowski
Yr 3
#126
DC
Tate Omli
Yr 1
#68
About these metrics
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games. ✓
Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: Momentum Control is a great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: Game Control is another great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself ✓
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games. ✓
Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: Momentum Control is a great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: Game Control is another great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself ✓