Miami at Wake Forest Week 3 College Football Matchup Miami at Wake Forest Matchup - Week 3
Fri, Sep 18 2026 · Week 3 · 🏟 BB&T Field Winston-Salem, NC · Turf · 31,500 cap
Miami✈ 702 miSame TZ
Away
VS
Preseason projection — This game has not yet been played and 2026 in-season data is not yet available. Edges are based on 2025 full-season performance. Confidence will increase once in-season games are logged.
📊 Punt & Rally Projection
Miami
32
Wake Forest
16
P&R Line Miami -16
P&R Total O/U 48
Confidence 69 Good
Matchup Prediction
Miami has the edge in this matchup
Both Momentum Control (CSS) and Game Control metrics favor Miami entering this game.
Momentum Control
61.3%
Miami wins
Lean
Game Control
49.4%
Miami wins
Toss-up
Advanced Stats
All 4 factors agree → Miami · 83.1% ATS historically when all four align
↓ See full breakdown
Miami 2026 Schedule
Miami's 2026 Schedule
DateMatchupSpreadTotalResultO/UCover
Fri 9/4Miami at Stanford-23
Thu 9/10Miami vs Florida A&M-35
Fri 9/18Miami at Wake Forest-16
Sat 9/26Miami vs Central Michigan-30
Sat 10/3Miami at Clemson-9.5
— Bye Week —
Sat 10/17Miami vs Florida State-17
Sat 10/24Miami vs Pittsburgh-17
Sat 10/31Miami at North Carolina-18
Sat 11/7Miami at Notre Dame+7
Sat 11/14Miami vs Duke-20.5
Fri 11/20Miami vs Virginia Tech-17.5
Sat 11/28Miami vs Boston College-28.5
Wake Forest 2026 Schedule
Wake Forest's 2026 Schedule
DateMatchupSpreadTotalResultO/UCover
Thu 9/3Wake Forest vs Akron-22
Sat 9/12Wake Forest at Purdue-5
Fri 9/18Wake Forest vs Miami+16
Sat 9/26Wake Forest at Louisville+9.5
Sat 10/3Wake Forest vs Stanford-9.5
Sat 10/10Wake Forest at NC State+4
Sat 10/17Wake Forest at California+3
— Bye Week —
Sat 10/31Wake Forest vs Virginia+0
Sat 11/7Wake Forest vs Merrimack-27.5
Sat 11/14Wake Forest at SMU+11.5
Sat 11/21Wake Forest at Georgia Tech+2
Sat 11/28Wake Forest vs Duke-2
Advanced Stats
Advanced Analytics Matchup
Matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense) · 2025 season (prior year)
Miami PPA Edge
Agreement Signals — When All Metrics Agree
Elite · 83.1% ATS
PPA + PPO + SR + Havoc
All 4 Agree
→ Miami
Elite · 82.4% ATS
PPA + PPO + Havoc
3 Agree
→ Miami
Elite · 73.9% ATS
PPA + Success Rate
Both Agree
→ Miami
Individual Factors — Ranked by Predictive Strength
PPA Overall
Points added per play · Elite predictor
Miami #35
+0.244
Wake Forest #82
+0.204
Miami Edge
PPA Passing
Pass efficiency edge · Strong predictor
Miami #13
+0.528
Wake Forest #69
+0.381
Miami Edge
Havoc Total
Def. disruption rate · Strong predictor
Miami #13
0.189
Wake Forest #21
0.182
TFLs, sacks, PBUs, forced fumbles — higher is better
Miami Edge
Points Per Opp
Drive-finishing edge · Strong predictor
Miami #24
+7.594
Wake Forest #113
+5.745
Miami Edge
Success Rate
Play consistency edge · Solid predictor
Miami #23
+0.814
Wake Forest #112
+0.750
Miami Edge
Field Position
Avg start (lower=better) · Solid predictor
Miami #44
69.8
Wake Forest #30
69.3
Avg yards from own endzone to average start — lower is better · longer bar = better field position
Wake Forest Edge
Advanced stats sourced from CFBD · 2025 season (prior year — 2026 data not yet available) · Edges are matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense)
Power Ratings
Team Power Ratings
Overall · Offense · Defense ratings · Updated as season progresses
Miami Rated Higher
Overall Power Rating
Miami #7
24.1
Wake Forest #45
4.6
Offense Rating
Miami #7
27.0
Wake Forest #56
16.6
Defense Rating (lower = better defense)
Miami #8
2.9
Wake Forest #37
12.0
Power ratings updated throughout the season as results accumulate
Momentum Control (CSS)
Consecutive Scoring Sequences Who builds scoring momentum? Miami Edge
Avg sequences created per game
Miami #51
1.27
Wake Forest #42
1.00
Avg sequences allowed per game (lower is better)
Miami #8
0.40
Wake Forest #40
0.75
Miami +0.27
CSS Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 61.3% of games historically
Based on 2025 full season · preseason estimate
Game Control (GC)
Win Probability Dominance Who controls games start to finish? Miami Edge
Avg GC score per game (offense)
Miami #6
61.9
Wake Forest #20
59.6
Avg GC score allowed per game (lower is better)
Miami #11
21.7
Wake Forest #20
26.3
Miami +2.3
GC Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 49.4% of games historically
Based on 2025 full season · preseason estimate
Coaching Matchup
Miami
Mario Cristobal #20
35–19 (65%) · Yr 5 at school
OC Shannon Dawson Yr 3 #8
DC Corey Hetherman Yr 2 #9
Staff Rating
3.90 #7
Wake Forest
Jake Dickert #40
9–4 (69%) · Yr 2 at school
OC Rob Ezell Yr 2 #53
DC Scottie Hazelton Yr 2 #51
Staff Rating
3.00 #47
About these metrics
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games.

Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: Momentum Control is a great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set.

Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: Game Control is another great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set.

Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself