Sat, Oct 11 2025
·
Week 7
·
🏟 Vaught-Hemingway Stadium
Oxford, MS
·
Turf
·
64,038 cap
Washington State✈ 1,670 mi+2 hr TZ
Matchup Prediction
Ole Miss
has the edge in this matchup
Both Momentum Control (CSS) and Game Control metrics favor
Ole Miss entering this game.
Momentum Control
71.6%
Ole Miss wins
Solid
Game Control
76%
Ole Miss wins
Strong
Vegas Spread
Ole Miss -33.5
O/U 58.5
DraftKings
Advanced Stats
All 4 factors agree → Ole Miss
· 83.1% ATS historically when all four align
↓ See full breakdown
Washington State 2025 Schedule
Washington State's 2025 Schedule
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 8/30 | Washington State vs Idaho | -16.5W13–10 | 50.5 | W13–10 | U | N |
| Sat 9/6 | Washington State vs San Diego State | -2.0W36–13 | 46.5 | W36–13 | O | Y |
| Sat 9/13 | Washington State at North Texas | +6.5L10–59 | 57.5 | L10–59 | O | N |
| Sat 9/20 | Washington State vs Washington | +21.0L24–59 | 51.5 | L24–59 | O | N |
| Sat 9/27 | Washington State at Colorado State | +4.5W20–3 | 48.5 | W20–3 | U | Y |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Sat 10/11 | Washington State at Ole Miss | +33.5L21–24 | 58.5 | L21–24 | U | Y |
| Sat 10/18 | Washington State at Virginia | +16.5L20–22 | 56.5 | L20–22 | U | Y |
| Sat 10/25 | Washington State vs Toledo | +1.5W28–7 | 44.5 | W28–7 | U | Y |
| Sat 11/1 | Washington State at Oregon State | -3.5L7–10 | 47.5 | L7–10 | U | N |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Sat 11/15 | Washington State vs Louisiana Tech | -10.0W28–3 | 43.5 | W28–3 | U | Y |
| Sat 11/22 | Washington State at James Madison | +15.0L20–24 | 44.5 | L20–24 | U | Y |
| Sat 11/29 | Washington State vs Oregon State | -14.0W32–8 | 42.5 | W32–8 | U | Y |
| Mon 12/22 | Washington State vs Utah State | +1.0W34–21 | 50.0 | W34–21 | O | Y |
Ole Miss 2025 Schedule
Ole Miss's 2025 Schedule
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 8/30 | Ole Miss vs Georgia State | -38.5W63–7 | 62.5 | W63–7 | O | Y |
| Sat 9/6 | Ole Miss at Kentucky | -8.0W30–23 | 51.5 | W30–23 | O | N |
| Sat 9/13 | Ole Miss vs Arkansas | -3.5W41–35 | 60.5 | W41–35 | O | Y |
| Sat 9/20 | Ole Miss vs Tulane | -12.5W45–10 | 61.5 | W45–10 | U | Y |
| Sat 9/27 | Ole Miss vs LSU | -2.5W24–19 | 57.5 | W24–19 | U | Y |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Sat 10/11 | Ole Miss vs Washington State | -33.5W24–21 | 58.5 | W24–21 | U | N |
| Sat 10/18 | Ole Miss at Georgia | +7.5L35–43 | 56.5 | L35–43 | O | N |
| Sat 10/25 | Ole Miss at Oklahoma | +5.5W34–26 | 52.5 | W34–26 | O | Y |
| Sat 11/1 | Ole Miss vs South Carolina | -12.5W30–14 | 55.5 | W30–14 | U | Y |
| Sat 11/8 | Ole Miss vs The Citadel | -51.5W49–0 | 63.5 | W49–0 | U | N |
| Sat 11/15 | Ole Miss vs Florida | -10.5W34–24 | 53.5 | W34–24 | O | N |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Fri 11/28 | Ole Miss at Mississippi State | -7.5W38–19 | 62.5 | W38–19 | U | Y |
| Sat 12/20 | Ole Miss vs Tulane | -17.5W41–10 | 57.5 | W41–10 | U | Y |
| Thu 1/1 | Ole Miss vs Georgia | +6.0W39–34 | 53.5 | W39–34 | O | Y |
| Thu 1/8 | Ole Miss vs Miami | +3.0L27–31 | 52.5 | L27–31 | O | N |
Advanced Stats
Advanced Analytics Matchup
Matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense) ·
2025 season
Agreement Signals — When All Metrics Agree
Elite · 83.1% ATS
PPA + PPO + SR + Havoc
All 4 Agree
→ Ole Miss
Elite · 82.4% ATS
PPA + PPO + Havoc
3 Agree
→ Ole Miss
Elite · 73.9% ATS
PPA + Success Rate
Both Agree
→ Ole Miss
Individual Factors — Ranked by Predictive Strength
PPA Overall
Points added per play · Elite predictor
PPA Passing
Pass efficiency edge · Strong predictor
Havoc Total
Def. disruption rate · Strong predictor
TFLs, sacks, PBUs, forced fumbles — higher is better
Points Per Opp
Drive-finishing edge · Strong predictor
Success Rate
Play consistency edge · Solid predictor
Field Position
Avg start (lower=better) · Solid predictor
Avg yards from own endzone to average start — lower is better · longer bar = better field position
Advanced stats sourced from CFBD · 2025 season ·
Edges are matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense)
Power Ratings
Team Power Ratings
Overall · Offense · Defense ratings · Updated as season progresses
Power ratings updated throughout the season as results accumulate
Momentum Control (CSS)
Consecutive Scoring Sequences
Who builds scoring momentum?
Ole Miss Edge
Ole Miss +1.35
CSS Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 71.6% of games historically
Based on 5 games this season
Game Control (GC)
Win Probability Dominance
Who controls games start to finish?
Ole Miss Edge
Ole Miss +31.1
GC Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 76% of games historically
Based on 5 games this season
Actual Result
CSS Battle
Ole Miss
1 — 0 sequences
✓ Predicted correctly
GC Battle
Ole Miss
41.8 — 30.0 GC score
✓ Predicted correctly
Game Result
Ole Miss won by 3
✓ Model called it
Spread Context
ATS Historical Context
Based on 2021–2025 backtest · FBS vs FBS · Regular season
Both metrics agree on Ole Miss with a large edge. Historically, dominant teams like this are fully priced into the spread — the agreed-upon team covers just 50.2% of the time. The metrics predict game control better than they beat the number.
ATS data is informational only. Past cover rates do not guarantee future results.
Coaching Matchup
Washington State
Jimmy Rogers #1
0–0 (0%)
· Yr 1 at school
OC
Danny Freund
Yr 1
#1
DC
Jesse Bobbit
Yr 1
#1
Ole Miss
Lane Kiffin #1
43–18 (71%)
· Yr 6 at school
OC
Charlie Weis Jr.
Yr 2
#1
DC
Pete Golding
Yr 2
#1
About these metrics
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games. ✓
Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: Momentum Control is a great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: Game Control is another great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself ✓
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games. ✓
Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: Momentum Control is a great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: Game Control is another great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself ✓