Louisiana at Minnesota Week 5 College Football Matchup Louisiana at Minnesota Matchup - Week 5
Sat, Sep 30 2023 · Week 5 · 🏟 Huntington Bank Stadium Minneapolis, MN · Turf · 50,805 cap
Louisiana✈ 1,021 miSame TZ
24 35
Final
Home
📊 Punt & Rally Projection
Louisiana
25
Minnesota
27
P&R Line Minnesota -1.5
P&R Total O/U 51.5
Confidence 90 High
Vegas Minnesota -9.5 · O/U 49.0
Matchup Prediction
Louisiana has the edge in this matchup
Both Momentum Control (CSS) and Game Control metrics favor Louisiana entering this game.
Momentum Control
61.3%
Louisiana wins
Lean
Game Control
64.9%
Louisiana wins
Lean
Vegas Spread
Minnesota -9.5
O/U 49.0
William Hill (New Jersey)
Advanced Stats
All 4 factors agree → Louisiana · 83.1% ATS historically when all four align
↓ See full breakdown
Louisiana 2023 Schedule
Louisiana's 2023 Schedule
DateMatchupSpreadTotalResultO/UCover
Sat 9/2Louisiana vs Northwestern State-35.0W38–1354.5W38–13UN
Sat 9/9Louisiana at Old Dominion-6.0L31–3851.0L31–38ON
Sat 9/16Louisiana at UAB+2.0W41–2160.0W41–21OY
Sat 9/23Louisiana vs Buffalo-10.5W45–3857.5W45–38ON
Sat 9/30Louisiana at Minnesota+9.5L24–3549.0L24–35ON
Sat 10/7Louisiana vs Texas State-1.0W34–3067.5W34–30UY
— Bye Week —
Sat 10/21Louisiana vs Georgia State-3.0L17–2062.0L17–20UN
Sat 10/28Louisiana at South Alabama+11.5W33–2055.0W33–20UY
Sat 11/4Louisiana at Arkansas State-9.0L17–3760.0L17–37UN
Thu 11/9Louisiana vs Southern Miss-8.5L31–3451.5L31–34ON
Sat 11/18Louisiana at Troy+17.5L24–3147.5L24–31OY
Sat 11/25Louisiana vs UL Monroe-12.5W52–2153.0W52–21OY
Sat 12/16Louisiana vs Jacksonville State+3.5L31–3458.5L31–34OY
Minnesota 2023 Schedule
Minnesota's 2023 Schedule
DateMatchupSpreadTotalResultO/UCover
Thu 8/31Minnesota vs Nebraska-7.5W13–1043.0W13–10UN
Sat 9/9Minnesota vs Eastern Michigan-19.5W25–648.0W25–6UN
Sat 9/16Minnesota at North Carolina+7.0L13–3151.0L13–31UN
Sat 9/23Minnesota at Northwestern-11.5L34–3739.5L34–37ON
Sat 9/30Minnesota vs Louisiana-9.5W35–2449.0W35–24OY
Sat 10/7Minnesota vs Michigan+18.5L10–5246.0L10–52ON
— Bye Week —
Sat 10/21Minnesota at Iowa+3.0W12–1030.5W12–10UY
Sat 10/28Minnesota vs Michigan State-6.5W27–1241.5W27–12UY
Sat 11/4Minnesota vs Illinois-1.5L26–2743.0L26–27ON
Sat 11/11Minnesota at Purdue-1.5L30–4948.5L30–49ON
Sat 11/18Minnesota at Ohio State+27.5L3–3751.5L3–37UN
Sat 11/25Minnesota vs Wisconsin+1.5L14–2842.0L14–28UN
Tue 12/26Minnesota vs Bowling Green-2.5W30–2445.0W30–24OY
Advanced Stats
Advanced Analytics Matchup
Matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense) · 2023 season
Louisiana PPA Edge
Agreement Signals — When All Metrics Agree
Elite · 83.1% ATS
PPA + PPO + SR + Havoc
All 4 Agree
→ Louisiana
Elite · 82.4% ATS
PPA + PPO + Havoc
3 Agree
→ Louisiana
Elite · 73.9% ATS
PPA + Success Rate
Both Agree
→ Louisiana
Individual Factors — Ranked by Predictive Strength
PPA Overall
Points added per play · Elite predictor
Louisiana #48
+0.443
Minnesota #118
+0.271
Louisiana Edge
PPA Passing
Pass efficiency edge · Strong predictor
Louisiana #49
+0.623
Minnesota #123
+0.368
Louisiana Edge
Havoc Total
Def. disruption rate · Strong predictor
Louisiana #84
0.156
Minnesota #131
0.114
TFLs, sacks, PBUs, forced fumbles — higher is better
Louisiana Edge
Points Per Opp
Drive-finishing edge · Strong predictor
Louisiana #42
+8.827
Minnesota #73
+8.235
Louisiana Edge
Success Rate
Play consistency edge · Solid predictor
Louisiana #35
+0.878
Minnesota #87
+0.856
Louisiana Edge
Field Position
Avg start (lower=better) · Solid predictor
Louisiana #44
69.7
Minnesota #85
71.0
Avg yards from own endzone to average start — lower is better · longer bar = better field position
Louisiana Edge
Advanced stats sourced from CFBD · 2023 season · Edges are matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense)
Power Ratings
Team Power Ratings
Overall · Offense · Defense ratings · Updated as season progresses
Minnesota Rated Higher
Overall Power Rating
Louisiana
-3.7
Minnesota
6.1
Offense Rating
Louisiana
17.6
Minnesota
16.9
Defense Rating (lower = better defense)
Louisiana
21.2
Minnesota
10.8
Power ratings updated throughout the season as results accumulate
Momentum Control (CSS)
Consecutive Scoring Sequences Who builds scoring momentum? Louisiana Edge
Avg sequences created per game
Louisiana #75
1.33
Minnesota #105
1.00
Avg sequences allowed per game (lower is better)
Louisiana #26
1.33
Minnesota #70
0.25
Louisiana +0.33
CSS Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 61.3% of games historically
Based on 4 games this season
Game Control (GC)
Win Probability Dominance Who controls games start to finish? Louisiana Edge
Avg GC score per game (offense)
Louisiana #1
64.2
Minnesota #1
47.3
Avg GC score allowed per game (lower is better)
Louisiana #39
19.1
Minnesota #91
36.6
Louisiana +16.8
GC Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 64.9% of games historically
Based on 4 games this season
Spread Context
ATS Historical Context
Based on 2021–2025 backtest · FBS vs FBS · Regular season

Both metrics agree on Louisiana with a solid GC edge. Teams with this profile have covered 53.0% of the time historically (n=330) — a mild lean.

ATS data is informational only. Past cover rates do not guarantee future results.

Coaching Matchup
Louisiana
Michael Desormeaux #1
9–8 (53%) · Yr 2 at school
OC Tim Leger Yr 2 #1
DC LaMar Morgan Yr 2 #1
Staff Rating
0.00 #1
Minnesota
P. J. Fleck #1
46–28 (62%) · Yr 7 at school
OC Greg Harbaugh Jr. Yr 1 #1
DC Nick Monroe Yr 1 #1
Staff Rating
0.00 #1
About these metrics
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games.

Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: Momentum Control is a great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set.

Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: Game Control is another great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set.

Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself