Sat, Sep 17 2022
·
Week 3
·
🏟 Boone Pickens Stadium
Stillwater, OK
·
Turf
·
60,218 cap
Arkansas-Pine Bluff✈ 312 miSame TZ
Preseason projection — This game has not yet been played and 2022 in-season data is not yet available.
Edges are based on 2021 full-season performance.
Confidence will increase once in-season games are logged.
Matchup Prediction
Toss-up — no clear edge
Neither metric shows a meaningful pre-game edge in this matchup.
Momentum Control
58.4%
—
Lean
Game Control
76%
Oklahoma State wins
Strong
Vegas Spread
Oklahoma State -54.5
O/U 64.5
consensus
Arkansas-Pine Bluff 2022 Schedule
Arkansas-Pine Bluff's 2022 Schedule
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Sat 9/17 | Arkansas-Pine Bluff at Oklahoma State | +54.5L7–63 | 64.5 | L7–63 | O | N |
Oklahoma State 2022 Schedule
Oklahoma State's 2022 Schedule
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 9/1 | Oklahoma State vs Central Michigan | -20.5W58–44 | 58.0 | W58–44 | O | N |
| Sat 9/10 | Oklahoma State vs Arizona State | -12.0W34–17 | 58.5 | W34–17 | U | Y |
| Sat 9/17 | Oklahoma State vs Arkansas-Pine Bluff | -54.5W63–7 | 64.5 | W63–7 | O | Y |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Sat 10/1 | Oklahoma State at Baylor | +2.5W36–25 | 56.0 | W36–25 | O | Y |
| Sat 10/8 | Oklahoma State vs Texas Tech | -11.0W41–31 | 66.0 | W41–31 | O | N |
| Sat 10/15 | Oklahoma State at TCU | +5.0L40–43 | 69.5 | L40–43 | O | Y |
| Sat 10/22 | Oklahoma State vs Texas | +6.5W41–34 | 58.5 | W41–34 | O | Y |
| Sat 10/29 | Oklahoma State at Kansas State | +2.5L0–48 | 57.5 | L0–48 | U | N |
| Sat 11/5 | Oklahoma State at Kansas | +3.0L16–37 | 59.5 | L16–37 | U | N |
| Sat 11/12 | Oklahoma State vs Iowa State | +2.5W20–14 | 47.5 | W20–14 | U | Y |
| Sat 11/19 | Oklahoma State at Oklahoma | +7.0L13–28 | 67.5 | L13–28 | U | N |
| Sat 11/26 | Oklahoma State vs West Virginia | -5.5L19–24 | 59.5 | L19–24 | U | N |
| Tue 12/27 | Oklahoma State vs Wisconsin | +5.0L17–24 | 45.0 | L17–24 | U | N |
Momentum Control (CSS)
Consecutive Scoring Sequences
Who builds scoring momentum?
Arkansas-Pine Bluff Edge
Arkansas-Pine Bluff +0.00
CSS Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 58.4% of games historically
Based on 2021 full season · preseason estimate
Game Control (GC)
Win Probability Dominance
Who controls games start to finish?
Oklahoma State Edge
Oklahoma State +60.0
GC Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 76% of games historically
Based on 2021 full season · preseason estimate
About these metrics
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games. ✓
Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: Momentum Control is a great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: Game Control is another great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself ✓
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games. ✓
Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: Momentum Control is a great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: Game Control is another great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself ✓