Sat, Oct 22 2022
·
Week 8
·
🏟 Faurot Field
Columbia, MO
·
Turf
·
71,168 cap
Vanderbilt✈ 358 miSame TZ
Matchup Prediction
Metrics disagree on this matchup
Momentum Control favors Vanderbilt,
while Game Control favors Missouri.
Split signals historically show weaker predictive confidence — treat as a toss-up.
⚡ Split Signal — Metrics Disagree
Momentum Control
61.3%
Vanderbilt wins
Lean
Game Control
58.6%
Missouri wins
Lean
Vegas Spread
Missouri -14
O/U 49.0
teamrankings
Advanced Stats
All 4 factors agree → Missouri
· 83.1% ATS historically when all four align
↓ See full breakdown
Vanderbilt 2022 Schedule
Vanderbilt's 2022 Schedule
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 8/27 | Vanderbilt at Hawai'i | -9.5W63–10 | 54.5 | W63–10 | O | Y |
| Sat 9/3 | Vanderbilt vs Elon | -18.5W42–31 | 51.5 | W42–31 | O | N |
| Sat 9/10 | Vanderbilt vs Wake Forest | +13.5L25–45 | 65.5 | L25–45 | O | N |
| Sat 9/17 | Vanderbilt at Northern Illinois | +2.5W38–28 | 58.5 | W38–28 | O | Y |
| Sat 9/24 | Vanderbilt at Alabama | +40.5L3–55 | 61.0 | L3–55 | U | N |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Sat 10/8 | Vanderbilt vs Ole Miss | +17.0L28–52 | 59.5 | L28–52 | O | N |
| Sat 10/15 | Vanderbilt at Georgia | +37.5L0–55 | 56.5 | L0–55 | U | N |
| Sat 10/22 | Vanderbilt at Missouri | +14.0L14–17 | 49.0 | L14–17 | U | Y |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Sat 11/5 | Vanderbilt vs South Carolina | +6.5L27–38 | 49.0 | L27–38 | O | N |
| Sat 11/12 | Vanderbilt at Kentucky | +17.0W24–21 | 45.5 | W24–21 | U | Y |
| Sat 11/19 | Vanderbilt vs Florida | +14.0W31–24 | 58.0 | W31–24 | U | Y |
| Sat 11/26 | Vanderbilt vs Tennessee | +14.0L0–56 | 63.5 | L0–56 | U | N |
Missouri 2022 Schedule
Missouri's 2022 Schedule
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 9/1 | Missouri vs Louisiana Tech | -20.0W52–24 | 62.5 | W52–24 | O | Y |
| Sat 9/10 | Missouri at Kansas State | +7.0L12–40 | 52.5 | L12–40 | U | N |
| Sat 9/17 | Missouri vs Abilene Christian | -31.5W34–17 | 56.5 | W34–17 | U | N |
| Sat 9/24 | Missouri at Auburn | +7.5L14–17 | 51.0 | L14–17 | U | Y |
| Sat 10/1 | Missouri vs Georgia | +30.5L22–26 | 54.0 | L22–26 | U | Y |
| Sat 10/8 | Missouri at Florida | +11.0L17–24 | 53.5 | L17–24 | U | Y |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Sat 10/22 | Missouri vs Vanderbilt | -14.0W17–14 | 49.0 | W17–14 | U | N |
| Sat 10/29 | Missouri at South Carolina | +3.5W23–10 | 45.5 | W23–10 | U | Y |
| Sat 11/5 | Missouri vs Kentucky | -1.0L17–21 | 40.0 | L17–21 | U | N |
| Sat 11/12 | Missouri at Tennessee | +18.5L24–66 | 57.5 | L24–66 | O | N |
| Sat 11/19 | Missouri vs New Mexico State | -29.0W45–14 | 46.5 | W45–14 | O | Y |
| Fri 11/25 | Missouri vs Arkansas | +3.0W29–27 | 55.5 | W29–27 | O | Y |
| Fri 12/23 | Missouri vs Wake Forest | +3.0L17–27 | 59.0 | L17–27 | U | N |
Advanced Stats
Advanced Analytics Matchup
Matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense) ·
2022 season
Agreement Signals — When All Metrics Agree
Elite · 83.1% ATS
PPA + PPO + SR + Havoc
All 4 Agree
→ Missouri
Elite · 82.4% ATS
PPA + PPO + Havoc
3 Agree
→ Missouri
Elite · 73.9% ATS
PPA + Success Rate
Both Agree
→ Missouri
Individual Factors — Ranked by Predictive Strength
PPA Overall
Points added per play · Elite predictor
PPA Passing
Pass efficiency edge · Strong predictor
Havoc Total
Def. disruption rate · Strong predictor
TFLs, sacks, PBUs, forced fumbles — higher is better
Points Per Opp
Drive-finishing edge · Strong predictor
Success Rate
Play consistency edge · Solid predictor
Field Position
Avg start (lower=better) · Solid predictor
Avg yards from own endzone to average start — lower is better · longer bar = better field position
Advanced stats sourced from CFBD · 2022 season ·
Edges are matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense)
Power Ratings
Team Power Ratings
Overall · Offense · Defense ratings · Updated as season progresses
Power ratings updated throughout the season as results accumulate
Momentum Control (CSS)
Consecutive Scoring Sequences
Who builds scoring momentum?
Vanderbilt Edge
Vanderbilt +0.50
CSS Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 61.3% of games historically
Based on 6 games this season
Game Control (GC)
Win Probability Dominance
Who controls games start to finish?
Missouri Edge
Missouri +6.0
GC Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 58.6% of games historically
Based on 6 games this season
Spread Context
ATS Historical Context
Based on 2021–2025 backtest · FBS vs FBS · Regular season
CSS and GC disagree on this matchup. When the metrics split, historical cover rates are essentially random — treat this as a coin flip against the spread.
ATS data is informational only. Past cover rates do not guarantee future results.
Coaching Matchup
Vanderbilt
Clark Lea #1
2–10 (17%)
· Yr 2 at school
OC
Joey Lynch
Yr 1
#1
DC
Nick Howell
Yr 1
#1
Missouri
Eliah Drinkwitz #1
11–12 (48%)
· Yr 3 at school
OC
Curtis Luper
Yr 1
#1
DC
Blake Baker
Yr 1
#1
About these metrics
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games. ✓
Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: Momentum Control is a great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: Game Control is another great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself ✓
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games. ✓
Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: Momentum Control is a great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: Game Control is another great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself ✓