Sat, Sep 4 2021
·
Week 1
·
🏟 Paulson Stadium
Statesboro, GA
·
Turf
·
24,300 cap
Gardner-Webb✈ 195 miSame TZ
Matchup Prediction
Toss-up — no clear edge
Neither metric shows a meaningful pre-game edge in this matchup.
Momentum Control
58.4%
—
Lean
Game Control
50.6%
—
Toss-up
Vegas Spread
Georgia Southern -27.5
O/U 48.0
William Hill (New Jersey)
Gardner-Webb 2021 Schedule
Gardner-Webb's 2021 Schedule
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 9/4 | Gardner-Webb at Georgia Southern | +27.5L25–30 | 48.0 | L25–30 | O | Y |
| Sat 9/11 | Gardner-Webb at Charlotte | +23.0L10–38 | 58.0 | L10–38 | U | N |
Georgia Southern 2021 Schedule
Georgia Southern's 2021 Schedule
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 9/4 | Georgia Southern vs Gardner-Webb | -27.5W30–25 | 48.0 | W30–25 | O | N |
| Sat 9/11 | Georgia Southern at Florida Atlantic | +6.5L6–38 | 48.5 | L6–38 | U | N |
| Sat 9/18 | Georgia Southern at Arkansas | +23.0L10–45 | 53.5 | L10–45 | O | N |
| Sat 9/25 | Georgia Southern vs Louisiana | +14.5L20–28 | 54.5 | L20–28 | U | Y |
| Sat 10/2 | Georgia Southern vs Arkansas State | -1.5W59–33 | 66.5 | W59–33 | O | Y |
| Sat 10/9 | Georgia Southern at Troy | +5.5L24–27 | 51.0 | L24–27 | U | Y |
| Thu 10/14 | Georgia Southern at South Alabama | +2.5L14–41 | 49.0 | L14–41 | O | N |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Sat 10/30 | Georgia Southern vs Georgia State | +6.0L14–21 | 55.0 | L14–21 | U | N |
| Sat 11/6 | Georgia Southern vs Coastal Carolina | +16.0L8–28 | 56.5 | L8–28 | U | N |
| Sat 11/13 | Georgia Southern at Texas State | +2.5W38–30 | 52.0 | W38–30 | O | Y |
| Sat 11/20 | Georgia Southern vs BYU | +20.0L17–34 | 57.0 | L17–34 | U | Y |
| Sat 11/27 | Georgia Southern at App State | +24.5L3–27 | 55.0 | L3–27 | U | Y |
Momentum Control (CSS)
Consecutive Scoring Sequences
Who builds scoring momentum?
Gardner-Webb Edge
Gardner-Webb +0.00
CSS Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 58.4% of games historically
Based on 0 games this season
Game Control (GC)
Win Probability Dominance
Who controls games start to finish?
Gardner-Webb Edge
Gardner-Webb +0.0
GC Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 50.6% of games historically
Based on 0 games this season
Actual Result
CSS Battle
Georgia Southern
2 — 0 sequences
✗ Predicted incorrectly
GC Battle
Georgia Southern
68.2 — 11.7 GC score
✗ Predicted incorrectly
Game Result
Georgia Southern won by 5
Spread Context
ATS Historical Context
Based on 2021–2025 backtest · FBS vs FBS · Regular season
Both metrics agree on Georgia Southern, but the GC edge is small. When metrics agree but GC is near-neutral, the agreed-upon team has covered only 46.7% of the time historically (n=224) — potentially a fade signal.
ATS data is informational only. Past cover rates do not guarantee future results.
About these metrics
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games. ✓
Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: CSS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: GS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself ✓
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games. ✓
Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: CSS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: GS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself ✓