UTEP at North Dakota State Week 9 College Football Matchup UTEP at North Dakota State Matchup - Week 9
Sat, Oct 31 2026 · Week 9 · 🏟 Fargodome Fargo, ND · Turf · 19,000 cap
UTEP✈ 1,164 mi+1 hr TZ
Preseason projection — This game has not yet been played and 2026 in-season data is not yet available. Edges are based on 2025 full-season performance. Confidence will increase once in-season games are logged.
📊 Punt & Rally Projection
UTEP
4
North Dakota State
24
P&R Line North Dakota State -19.5
P&R Total O/U 28
Confidence 28 New FBS Team
Matchup Prediction
Toss-up — no clear edge
Neither metric shows a meaningful pre-game edge in this matchup.
Momentum Control
58.4%
Lean
Game Control
75.9%
UTEP wins
Solid
🛋 UTEP Coming off BYE
UTEP 2026 Schedule
UTEP's 2026 Schedule
DateMatchupSpreadTotalResultO/UCover
Sat 9/5UTEP at Oklahoma+32
Sat 9/12UTEP vs Texas Southern-6.5
Sat 9/19UTEP at Michigan+30.5
Sat 9/26UTEP vs Oregon State+3
Sat 10/3UTEP at New Mexico+20.5
Sat 10/10UTEP vs Nevada-3
Sat 10/17UTEP vs San José State-2.5
— Bye Week —
Sat 10/31UTEP at North Dakota State+19.5
Sat 11/7UTEP vs Hawai'i+14
Sat 11/14UTEP vs Wyoming+3.5
Sat 11/21UTEP at Air Force+13.5
Sat 11/28UTEP at Northern Illinois+2
North Dakota State 2026 Schedule
North Dakota State's 2026 Schedule
DateMatchupSpreadTotalResultO/UCover
Sat 8/29North Dakota State vs Jacksonville State-7.5
Sat 9/5North Dakota State vs Fordham-24
Sat 9/12North Dakota State at Air Force-3.5
Sat 9/19North Dakota State at Sacramento State-2.5
— Bye Week —
Sat 10/3North Dakota State vs Wyoming-14
Sat 10/10North Dakota State at UNLV+5.5
Sat 10/17North Dakota State vs Nevada-20.5
Sat 10/24North Dakota State at New Mexico+3
Sat 10/31North Dakota State vs UTEP-19.5
— Bye Week —
Sat 11/14North Dakota State at Hawai'i+2
Sat 11/21North Dakota State vs Northern Illinois-20
Sat 11/28North Dakota State at San José State-15
Power Ratings
Team Power Ratings
Overall · Offense · Defense ratings · Updated as season progresses
North Dakota State Rated Higher
Overall Power Rating
UTEP #125
-16.2
North Dakota State #68
0.6
Offense Rating
UTEP #137
4.4
North Dakota State #78
14.8
Defense Rating (lower = better defense)
UTEP #116
20.6
North Dakota State #60
14.2
Power ratings updated throughout the season as results accumulate
Momentum Control (CSS)
Consecutive Scoring Sequences Who builds scoring momentum? UTEP Edge
Avg sequences created per game
UTEP #102
0.73
North Dakota State
0.00
Avg sequences allowed per game (lower is better)
UTEP #115
1.73
North Dakota State
0.00
UTEP +0.00
CSS Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 58.4% of games historically
Based on 2025 full season · preseason estimate
Game Control (GC)
Win Probability Dominance Who controls games start to finish? UTEP Edge
Avg GC score per game (offense)
UTEP #133
23.2
North Dakota State
0.0
Avg GC score allowed per game (lower is better)
UTEP #131
64.1
North Dakota State
0.0
UTEP +23.2
GC Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 75.9% of games historically
Based on 2025 full season · preseason estimate
Coaching Matchup
UTEP
Scotty Walden #126
5–19 (21%) · Yr 3 at school
OC Joe Pappalardo Yr 1 #67
DC Bobby Daly Yr 2 #105
Staff Rating
2.07 #121
North Dakota State
Tim Polasek #14
26–3 (90%) · Yr 3 at school
OC Dan Larson Yr 2 #15
DC Grant Olson Yr 3 #31
Staff Rating
3.68 #14
About these metrics
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games.

Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: CSS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set.

Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: GS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set.

Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself