Sat, Sep 19 2026
·
Week 3
·
🏟 FAU Stadium
Boca Raton, FL
·
Turf
·
30,000 cap
Preseason projection — This game has not yet been played and 2026 in-season data is not yet available.
Edges are based on 2025 full-season performance.
Confidence will increase once in-season games are logged.
Matchup Prediction
Florida International
has the edge in this matchup
Both Momentum Control (CSS) and Game Control metrics favor
Florida International entering this game.
Momentum Control
61.3%
Florida International wins
Lean
Game Control
49.4%
Florida International wins
Toss-up
Advanced Stats
All 4 factors agree → Florida International
· 83.1% ATS historically when all four align
↓ See full breakdown
Florida International 2026 Schedule
Florida International's 2026 Schedule
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 9/5 | Florida International at South Florida | +16.5 | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/12 | Florida International vs Buffalo | -4.5 | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/19 | Florida International at Florida Atlantic | +2 | — | — | — | — |
Florida Atlantic 2026 Schedule
Florida Atlantic's 2026 Schedule
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 9/5 | Florida Atlantic at Florida | +17 | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/12 | Florida Atlantic vs Navy | +7.5 | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/19 | Florida Atlantic vs Florida International | -2 | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/26 | Florida Atlantic at UL Monroe | -9.5 | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/3 | Florida Atlantic vs Texas Southern | -16 | — | — | — | — |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Sat 10/17 | Florida Atlantic at Army | +10 | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/24 | Florida Atlantic vs Rice | -11 | — | — | — | — |
| Thu 10/29 | Florida Atlantic at North Texas | +16.5 | — | — | — | — |
| Thu 11/5 | Florida Atlantic vs UTSA | +7.5 | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/14 | Florida Atlantic at Tulsa | +5.5 | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/21 | Florida Atlantic vs South Florida | +12 | — | — | — | — |
| Fri 11/27 | Florida Atlantic at East Carolina | +15 | — | — | — | — |
Advanced Stats
Advanced Analytics Matchup
Matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense) ·
2025 season (prior year)
Agreement Signals — When All Metrics Agree
Elite · 83.1% ATS
PPA + PPO + SR + Havoc
All 4 Agree
→ Florida International
Elite · 82.4% ATS
PPA + PPO + Havoc
3 Agree
→ Florida International
Elite · 73.9% ATS
PPA + Success Rate
Both Agree
→ Florida International
Individual Factors — Ranked by Predictive Strength
PPA Overall
Points added per play · Elite predictor
PPA Passing
Pass efficiency edge · Strong predictor
Havoc Total
Def. disruption rate · Strong predictor
TFLs, sacks, PBUs, forced fumbles — higher is better
Points Per Opp
Drive-finishing edge · Strong predictor
Success Rate
Play consistency edge · Solid predictor
Field Position
Avg start (lower=better) · Solid predictor
Avg yards from own endzone to average start — lower is better · longer bar = better field position
Advanced stats sourced from CFBD · 2025 season (prior year — 2026 data not yet available) ·
Edges are matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense)
Power Ratings
Team Power Ratings
Overall · Offense · Defense ratings · Updated as season progresses
Power ratings updated throughout the season as results accumulate
Momentum Control (CSS)
Consecutive Scoring Sequences
Who builds scoring momentum?
Florida International Edge
Florida International +0.61
CSS Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 61.3% of games historically
Based on 2025 full season · preseason estimate
Game Control (GC)
Win Probability Dominance
Who controls games start to finish?
Florida International Edge
Florida International +3.9
GC Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 49.4% of games historically
Based on 2025 full season · preseason estimate
Coaching Matchup
Florida International
Willie Simmons #101
7–6 (54%)
· Yr 2 at school
OC
Nick Coleman
Yr 2
#57
DC
Jovan Dewitt
Yr 3
#123
Florida Atlantic
Zach Kittley #115
4–8 (33%)
· Yr 2 at school
OC
Zach Kittley
Yr 1
#49
DC
Brett Dewhurst
Yr 2
#125
About these metrics
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games. ✓
Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: Momentum Control is a great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: Game Control is another great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself ✓
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games. ✓
Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: Momentum Control is a great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: Game Control is another great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself ✓