Chattanooga at Alabama Week 12 College Football Matchup Chattanooga at Alabama Matchup - Week 12
Sat, Nov 21 2026 · Week 12 · 🏟 Bryant Denny Stadium Tuscaloosa, AL · Turf · 101,821 cap
Chattanooga✈ 179 mi-1 hr TZ
Preseason projection — This game has not yet been played and 2026 in-season data is not yet available. Edges are based on 2025 full-season performance. Confidence will increase once in-season games are logged.
📊 Punt & Rally Projection
Chattanooga
17
Alabama
36
P&R Line Alabama -18.5
P&R Total O/U 52.5
Confidence 55 Early Season
Matchup Prediction
Toss-up — no clear edge
Neither metric shows a meaningful pre-game edge in this matchup.
Momentum Control
58.4%
Lean
Game Control
76%
Alabama wins
Strong
Chattanooga 2026 Schedule
Chattanooga's 2026 Schedule
DateMatchupSpreadTotalResultO/UCover
— Bye Week —
Sat 11/21Chattanooga at Alabama+18.5
Alabama 2026 Schedule
Alabama's 2026 Schedule
DateMatchupSpreadTotalResultO/UCover
Sat 9/5Alabama vs East Carolina-14
Sat 9/12Alabama at Kentucky-12.5
Sat 9/19Alabama vs Florida State-11.5
Sat 9/26Alabama vs South Carolina-13
Sat 10/3Alabama at Mississippi State-12.5
Sat 10/10Alabama vs Georgia+8
Sat 10/17Alabama at Tennessee+1
Sat 10/24Alabama vs Texas A&M-1
— Bye Week —
Sat 11/7Alabama at LSU+2.5
Sat 11/14Alabama at Vanderbilt-6.5
Sat 11/21Alabama vs Chattanooga-32.5
Sat 11/28Alabama vs Auburn-10
Momentum Control (CSS)
Consecutive Scoring Sequences Who builds scoring momentum? Chattanooga Edge
Avg sequences created per game
Chattanooga
0.00
Alabama #37
1.64
Avg sequences allowed per game (lower is better)
Chattanooga
0.00
Alabama #37
0.79
Chattanooga +0.00
CSS Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 58.4% of games historically
Based on 2025 full season · preseason estimate
Game Control (GC)
Win Probability Dominance Who controls games start to finish? Alabama Edge
Avg GC score per game (offense)
Chattanooga #138
3.2
Alabama #13
54.8
Avg GC score allowed per game (lower is better)
Chattanooga #139
92.9
Alabama #37
30.5
Alabama +51.6
GC Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 76% of games historically
Based on 2025 full season · preseason estimate
About these metrics
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games.

Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: Momentum Control is a great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set.

Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: Game Control is another great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set.

Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself