Duke at Virginia Week 15 College Football Matchup Duke at Virginia Matchup - Week 15
Saturday, December 6, 2025 · Week 15 · Neutral Site
Away (Neutral)
27 20
Final
Home (Neutral)
📊 Punt & Rally Projection
Duke
27
Virginia
32
P&R Line Virginia -5.5
P&R Total O/U 58.5
Confidence 90 High
Vegas Virginia -3.5 · O/U 58.5
Matchup Prediction
Virginia has the edge in this matchup
Both Momentum Control (CSS) and Game Control metrics favor Virginia entering this game.
Momentum Control
58.4%
Virginia wins
Lean
Game Control
67.1%
Virginia wins
Solid
Vegas Spread
Virginia -3.5
O/U 58.5
DraftKings
Advanced Stats
All 4 factors agree → Virginia · 83.1% ATS historically when all four align
↓ See full breakdown
Advanced Stats
Advanced Analytics Matchup
Matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense) · 2025 season
Virginia PPA Edge
Agreement Signals — When All Metrics Agree
Elite · 83.1% ATS
PPA + PPO + SR + Havoc
All 4 Agree
→ Virginia
Elite · 82.4% ATS
PPA + PPO + Havoc
3 Agree
→ Virginia
Elite · 73.9% ATS
PPA + Success Rate
Both Agree
→ Virginia
Individual Factors — Ranked by Predictive Strength
PPA Overall
Points added per play · Elite predictor
Duke #25
+0.309
Virginia #64
+0.416
Virginia Edge
PPA Passing
Pass efficiency edge · Strong predictor
Duke #24
+0.537
Virginia #76
+0.642
Virginia Edge
Havoc Total
Def. disruption rate · Strong predictor
Duke #36
0.172
Virginia #23
0.181
TFLs, sacks, PBUs, forced fumbles — higher is better
Virginia Edge
Points Per Opp
Drive-finishing edge · Strong predictor
Duke #26
+7.331
Virginia #82
+7.955
Virginia Edge
Success Rate
Play consistency edge · Solid predictor
Duke #30
+0.834
Virginia #82
+0.855
Virginia Edge
Field Position
Avg start (lower=better) · Solid predictor
Duke #20
68.7
Virginia #30
69.3
Avg yards from opponent endzone — lower is better · longer bar = better field position
Duke Edge
Advanced stats sourced from CFBD · 2025 season · Edges are matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense)
Power Ratings
Team Power Ratings
Overall · Offense · Defense ratings · Updated as season progresses
Virginia Rated Higher
Overall Power Rating
Duke
4.1
Virginia
7.1
Offense Rating
Duke
14.2
Virginia
17.9
Defense Rating (lower = better defense)
Duke
10.2
Virginia
10.7
Power ratings updated throughout the season as results accumulate
Momentum Control (CSS)
Consecutive Scoring Sequences Who builds scoring momentum? Virginia Edge
Avg sequences created per game
Duke
1.27
Virginia
1.36
Avg sequences allowed per game (lower is better)
Duke
1.73
Virginia
0.46
Virginia +0.09
CSS Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 58.4% of games historically
Based on 11 games this season
Game Control (GC)
Win Probability Dominance Who controls games start to finish? Virginia Edge
Avg GC score per game (offense)
Duke
44.1
Virginia
60.9
Avg GC score allowed per game (lower is better)
Duke
39.3
Virginia
18.9
Virginia +16.7
GC Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 67.1% of games historically
Based on 12 games this season
Actual Result
CSS Battle
Virginia
1 — 0 sequences
✓ Predicted correctly
GC Battle
Duke
14.2 — 68.4 GC score
✗ Predicted incorrectly
Game Result
Duke won by 7
✗ Model missed it
Spread Context
ATS Historical Context
Based on 2021–2025 backtest · FBS vs FBS · Regular season

Both metrics agree on Virginia with a solid GC edge. Teams with this profile have covered 53.0% of the time historically (n=330) — a mild lean.

ATS data is informational only. Past cover rates do not guarantee future results.

About these metrics
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games.

Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: CSS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set.

Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: GS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set.

Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself