Northwestern at Nebraska Week 5 College Football Matchup Northwestern at Nebraska Matchup - Week 5
Sat, Oct 2 2021 · Week 5 · 🏟 Memorial Stadium Lincoln, NE · Turf · 86,047 cap
Northwestern✈ 474 miSame TZ
7 56
Final
Home
📊 Punt & Rally Projection
Northwestern
13
Nebraska
37
P&R Line Nebraska -24
P&R Total O/U 50
Confidence 90 High
Vegas Nebraska -11 · O/U 51.5
Matchup Prediction
Northwestern has the edge in this matchup
Both Momentum Control (CSS) and Game Control metrics favor Northwestern entering this game.
Momentum Control
61.3%
Northwestern wins
Lean
Game Control
49.4%
Northwestern wins
Toss-up
Vegas Spread
Nebraska -11
O/U 51.5
teamrankings
Advanced Stats
All 4 factors agree → Nebraska · 83.1% ATS historically when all four align
↓ See full breakdown
Northwestern 2021 Schedule
Northwestern's 2021 Schedule
DateMatchupSpreadTotalResultO/UCover
Fri 9/3Northwestern vs Michigan State-3.0L21–3845.5L21–38ON
Sat 9/11Northwestern vs Indiana State-28.5W24–646.0W24–6UN
Sat 9/18Northwestern at Duke-2.5L23–3050.0L23–30ON
Sat 9/25Northwestern vs Ohio-13.5W35–647.5W35–6UY
Sat 10/2Northwestern at Nebraska+11.0L7–5651.5L7–56ON
— Bye Week —
Sat 10/16Northwestern vs Rutgers+2.5W21–745.0W21–7UY
Sat 10/23Northwestern at Michigan+23.5L7–3351.5L7–33UN
Sat 10/30Northwestern vs Minnesota+7.5L14–4143.5L14–41ON
Sat 11/6Northwestern vs Iowa+11.5L12–1740.5L12–17UY
Sat 11/13Northwestern at Wisconsin+26.0L7–3541.5L7–35ON
Sat 11/20Northwestern vs Purdue+11.0L14–3247.5L14–32UN
Sat 11/27Northwestern at Illinois+7.0L14–4745.0L14–47ON
Nebraska 2021 Schedule
Nebraska's 2021 Schedule
DateMatchupSpreadTotalResultO/UCover
Sat 8/28Nebraska at Illinois-6.5L22–3052.0L22–30UN
Sat 9/4Nebraska vs Fordham-42.0W52–755.0W52–7OY
Sat 9/11Nebraska vs Buffalo-13.5W28–354.0W28–3UY
Sat 9/18Nebraska at Oklahoma+22.5L16–2362.5L16–23UY
Sat 9/25Nebraska at Michigan State+3.5L20–2355.0L20–23UY
Sat 10/2Nebraska vs Northwestern-11.0W56–751.5W56–7OY
Sat 10/9Nebraska vs Michigan+2.5L29–3250.5L29–32ON
Sat 10/16Nebraska at Minnesota-4.5L23–3048.5L23–30ON
— Bye Week —
Sat 10/30Nebraska vs Purdue-7.5L23–2854.0L23–28UN
Sat 11/6Nebraska vs Ohio State+14.0L17–2668.5L17–26UY
Sat 11/13Nebraska vs SE Louisiana-28
Sat 11/20Nebraska at Wisconsin+10.0L28–3543.5L28–35OY
Fri 11/26Nebraska vs Iowa-1.5L21–2841.0L21–28ON
Advanced Stats
Advanced Analytics Matchup
Matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense) · 2021 season
Nebraska PPA Edge
Agreement Signals — When All Metrics Agree
Elite · 83.1% ATS
PPA + PPO + SR + Havoc
All 4 Agree
→ Nebraska
Elite · 82.4% ATS
PPA + PPO + Havoc
3 Agree
→ Nebraska
Elite · 73.9% ATS
PPA + Success Rate
Both Agree
→ Nebraska
Individual Factors — Ranked by Predictive Strength
PPA Overall
Points added per play · Elite predictor
Northwestern
+0.309
Nebraska
+0.567
Nebraska Edge
PPA Passing
Pass efficiency edge · Strong predictor
Northwestern
+0.444
Nebraska
+0.608
Nebraska Edge
Havoc Total
Def. disruption rate · Strong predictor
Northwestern
0.120
Nebraska
0.160
TFLs, sacks, PBUs, forced fumbles — higher is better
Nebraska Edge
Points Per Opp
Drive-finishing edge · Strong predictor
Northwestern
+5.936
Nebraska
+8.256
Nebraska Edge
Success Rate
Play consistency edge · Solid predictor
Northwestern
+0.825
Nebraska
+0.911
Nebraska Edge
Field Position
Avg start (lower=better) · Solid predictor
Northwestern
73.3
Nebraska
72.0
Avg yards from own endzone to average start — lower is better · longer bar = better field position
Nebraska Edge
Advanced stats sourced from CFBD · 2021 season · Edges are matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense)
Power Ratings
Team Power Ratings
Overall · Offense · Defense ratings · Updated as season progresses
Nebraska Rated Higher
Overall Power Rating
Northwestern
-0.6
Nebraska
4.8
Offense Rating
Northwestern
16.0
Nebraska
18.4
Defense Rating (lower = better defense)
Northwestern
16.6
Nebraska
13.6
Power ratings updated throughout the season as results accumulate
Momentum Control (CSS)
Consecutive Scoring Sequences Who builds scoring momentum? Northwestern Edge
Avg sequences created per game
Northwestern #133
1.00
Nebraska #109
0.50
Avg sequences allowed per game (lower is better)
Northwestern #137
1.00
Nebraska #32
0.25
Northwestern +0.50
CSS Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 61.3% of games historically
Based on 4 games this season
Game Control (GC)
Win Probability Dominance Who controls games start to finish? Northwestern Edge
Avg GC score per game (offense)
Northwestern #1
50.9
Nebraska #1
50.4
Avg GC score allowed per game (lower is better)
Northwestern #121
46.5
Nebraska #76
36.2
Northwestern +0.5
GC Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 49.4% of games historically
Based on 5 games this season
Actual Result
CSS Battle
Nebraska
3 — 0 sequences
✗ Predicted incorrectly
GC Battle
Nebraska
98.5 — 1.3 GC score
✗ Predicted incorrectly
Game Result
Nebraska won by 49
✗ Model missed it
Spread Context
ATS Historical Context
Based on 2021–2025 backtest · FBS vs FBS · Regular season

Both metrics agree on Northwestern, but the GC edge is small. When metrics agree but GC is near-neutral, the agreed-upon team has covered only 46.7% of the time historically (n=224) — potentially a fade signal.

ATS data is informational only. Past cover rates do not guarantee future results.

Coaching Matchup
Northwestern
Pat Fitzgerald #1
107–83 (56%) · Yr 16 at school
OC Mike Bajakian Yr 1 #1
DC Jim O'Neil Yr 1 #1
Staff Rating
0.00 #1
Nebraska
Scott Frost #1
14–22 (39%) · Yr 4 at school
OC Matt Lubick Yr 1 #1
DC Erik Chinander Yr 1 #1
Staff Rating
0.00 #1
About these metrics
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games.

Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: CSS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set.

Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: GS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set.

Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself