Notre Dame Composite Control — 2025

Notre Dame Composite Control — 2025 | Punt & Rally

2025 Composite Control — Game Control + Momentum Control

Composite Score

88.7

Composite Rank: #5 • 10–2 (FBS games)

GC Score

91.8

#5 in FBS

GC Net

+47.3

Raw GC Net

GC Off

61.3

SOS-Adj Offense

GC Allowed

13.9

Avg Allowed ↓

MC Score

85.7

#9 in FBS

MC Net

+0.83

Raw MC Net

MC Off

1.45

Adj. Sequences

MC Win%

100%

When winning MC

Game Control Game-by-Game Win Probability Log

Wk	Opponent	Result	GC Scores			Avg WP%	Ctrl%	Never Trailed
Wk	Opponent	Result	GC Off	GC Allowed	GC Net	Avg WP%	Ctrl%	Never Trailed
1	Miami A	L 24–27	10.1	70.1	-60	24.6%	0.7%	—
3	Texas A&M H	L 40–41	53.2	19.2	+33.9	62.9%	43.6%	—
4	Purdue H	W 56–30	92	4.7	+87.4	88.3%	96%	✓
5	Arkansas A	W 56–13	82.7	6.8	+75.9	86.5%	86.8%	—
6	Boise State H	W 28–7	74.8	9.3	+65.5	80%	78.2%	—
7	NC State H	W 36–7	71.9	9.5	+62.4	76.2%	66.5%	✓
8	USC H	W 34–24	66	16.1	+49.9	69.8%	67.7%	—
10	Boston College A	W 25–10	62.5	13.5	+49	66.3%	44.4%	✓
11	Navy H	W 49–10	87.7	6.2	+81.5	84.6%	91.5%	✓
12	Pittsburgh A	W 37–15	88	6.5	+81.5	84.8%	89.2%	✓
13	Syracuse H	W 70–7	98.2	1.4	+96.7	96.4%	99.3%	✓
14	Stanford A	W 49–20	92.5	4.1	+88.4	89.8%	93.7%	✓
10W / 12G			—	—	—	—	—	—

Momentum Control Game-by-Game Scoring Sequences Log

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opponent-Adjusted			Raw		Edge	Opp Wt
Wk	Opponent	Result	MC Off	MC Def ↓	MC Net	Off	Def ↓	Edge	Opp Wt
1	Miami A	L 24–27	3.46	3.46	+0	1	1	Tied	1
3	Texas A&M H	L 40–41	3.48	3.48	+0	1	1	Tied	1
4	Purdue H	W 56–30	0.67	0.33	+0.34	2	1	✓ +2	0.33
5	Arkansas A	W 56–13	6.8	0	+6.8	4	0	✓ +4	1
6	Boise State H	W 28–7	0	0	+0	0	0	Tied	1
7	NC State H	W 36–7	2.68	0	+2.68	2	0	✓ +2	1
8	USC H	W 34–24	0	2.15	-2.15	0	1	✗ 0	1
10	Boston College A	W 25–10	1.26	1.26	+0	1	1	Tied	1
11	Navy H	W 49–10	2.36	0	+2.36	4	0	✓ +4	0.59
12	Pittsburgh A	W 37–15	2	0	+2	1	0	✓ +1	1
13	Syracuse H	W 70–7	1.33	0	+1.33	4	0	✓ +4	0.33
14	Stanford A	W 49–20	3.16	1.05	+2.11	3	1	✓ +3	1
10W / 12G			—	—	—	23	6	—	—