North Texas Composite Control — 2025 | Punt & Rally
2025 Composite Control — Game Control + Momentum Control
Composite Score
89.5
Composite Rank: #4  •  11–2 (FBS games)
GC Score
85.1
#9 in FBS
GC Net
+38.8
Raw GC Net
GC Off
58.1
SOS-Adj Offense
GC Allowed
19.3
Avg Allowed ↓
MC Score
93.8
#4 in FBS
MC Net
+1.35
Raw MC Net
MC Off
1.89
Adj. Sequences
MC Win%
100%
When winning MC
Game Control Game-by-Game Win Probability Log
Wk Opponent Result GC Scores Avg WP% Ctrl% Never Trailed
GC Off GC Allowed GC Net
1 Lamar H 98.7 0.4 +98.3 99% 100%
2 Western Michigan A W 33–30 15.6 44.6 -29 37% 1.9%
3 Washington State H W 59–10 94.1 3.4 +90.8 91.6% 96.5%
4 Army A W 45–38 82.4 8.5 +73.9 78.8% 80.1%
5 South Alabama H W 36–22 82.9 6.4 +76.5 86.6% 100%
7 South Florida H L 36–63 30.1 50.4 -20.3 36.3% 25.6%
8 UTSA H W 55–17 76.4 12.4 +64 79.8% 80.4%
9 Charlotte A W 54–20 43.9 27.7 +16.2 56.7% 31.1%
10 Navy H W 31–17 92.8 5.3 +87.5 86.7% 97.3%
12 UAB A W 53–24 90.3 4.2 +86.1 89.5% 89.5%
13 Rice A W 56–24 63.5 24.9 +38.6 70.5% 64.1%
14 Temple H W 52–25 90 4.6 +85.4 88.6% 90.8%
15 Tulane A L 21–34 10.9 72.5 -61.7 20.4% 1.9%
1 San Diego State NPost W 49–47 87.6 5.3 +82.3 88.6% 97%
11W / 13G
Momentum Control Game-by-Game Scoring Sequences Log
Wk Opponent Result Opponent-Adjusted Raw Edge Opp Wt
MC Off MC Def ↓ MC Net Off Def ↓
2 Western Michigan A W 33–30 0 0 +0 0 0 Tied
0.34
3 Washington State H W 59–10 3.33 0 +3.33 6 0 ✓ +6
0.55
4 Army A W 45–38 1.14 1.14 +0 2 2 Tied
0.57
5 South Alabama H W 36–22 0 0 +0 0 0 Tied
0.37
7 South Florida H L 36–63 0 1.89 -1.89 0 1 ✗ 0
1
8 UTSA H W 55–17 5.52 0 +5.52 6 0 ✓ +6
0.92
9 Charlotte A W 54–20 0.12 0.05 +0.07 5 2 ✓ +5
0.02
10 Navy H W 31–17 0.59 0 +0.59 1 0 ✓ +1
0.59
12 UAB A W 53–24 0.57 0 +0.57 3 0 ✓ +3
0.19
13 Rice A W 56–24 0.72 0.18 +0.54 4 1 ✓ +4
0.18
14 Temple H W 52–25 1.14 0 +1.14 4 0 ✓ +4
0.28
15 Tulane A L 21–34 1.1 1.1 +0 1 1 Tied
1
1 San Diego State APost W 49–47 1.12 0 +1.12 1 0 ✓ +1
1
11W / 13G 33 7