Michigan State Composite Control — 2025

Michigan State Composite Control — 2025 | Punt & Rally

2025 Composite Control — Game Control + Momentum Control

Composite Score

47.4

Composite Rank: #88 • 3–8 (FBS games)

GC Score

37.3

#98 in FBS

GC Net

-22.4

Raw GC Net

GC Off

23.4

SOS-Adj Offense

GC Allowed

45.7

Avg Allowed ↓

MC Score

57.6

#84 in FBS

MC Net

-0.99

Raw MC Net

MC Off

0.34

Adj. Sequences

MC Win%

—

When winning MC

Game Control Game-by-Game Win Probability Log

Wk	Opponent	Result	GC Scores			Avg WP%	Ctrl%	Never Trailed
Wk	Opponent	Result	GC Off	GC Allowed	GC Net	Avg WP%	Ctrl%	Never Trailed
1	Western Michigan H	W 23–6	96.1	1.7	+94.5	95.8%	100%	✓
2	Boston College H	W 42–40	38	22	+16.1	59%	26.8%	—
3	Youngstown State H	—	77.4	9.3	+68.1	80.5%	82.2%	—
4	USC A	L 31–45	8.7	77	-68.3	18.8%	0.8%	—
6	Nebraska A	L 27–38	12.2	72.9	-60.6	25.7%	3.6%	—
7	UCLA H	L 13–38	17.3	69.6	-52.3	23.7%	14.9%	—
8	Indiana A	L 13–38	10.4	74.8	-64.5	19.7%	0%	—
9	Michigan H	L 20–31	10.8	73.5	-62.6	27.1%	0%	—
10	Minnesota A	L 20–23	20.3	48.3	-28	38.8%	8%	—
12	Penn State H	L 10–28	23.8	44.6	-20.8	43.1%	13.1%	—
13	Iowa A	L 17–20	35.8	45.6	-9.8	47.3%	28.9%	—
14	Maryland N	W 38–28	84.5	9.7	+74.9	75.8%	87.1%	✓
3W / 11G			—	—	—	—	—	—

Momentum Control Game-by-Game Scoring Sequences Log

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opponent-Adjusted			Raw		Edge	Opp Wt
Wk	Opponent	Result	MC Off	MC Def ↓	MC Net	Off	Def ↓	Edge	Opp Wt
1	Western Michigan H	W 23–6	0	0	+0	0	0	Tied	0.34
2	Boston College H	W 42–40	0	0	+0	0	0	Tied	1
4	USC A	L 31–45	2.15	4.29	-2.14	1	2	✗ 1	1
6	Nebraska A	L 27–38	1.03	1.03	+0	1	1	Tied	1
7	UCLA H	L 13–38	0	2.27	-2.27	0	2	✗ 0	1
8	Indiana A	L 13–38	0	11.86	-11.86	0	3	✗ 0	1
9	Michigan H	L 20–31	0	0	+0	0	0	Tied	1
10	Minnesota A	L 20–23	0	0	+0	0	0	Tied	1
12	Penn State H	L 10–28	0	2.6	-2.6	0	1	✗ 0	1
13	Iowa A	L 17–20	2.26	2.26	+0	1	1	Tied	1
14	Maryland H	W 38–28	1.01	1.01	+0	1	1	Tied	1
3W / 11G			—	—	—	4	11	—	—