Texas State Composite Control — 2025 | Punt & Rally
2025 Composite Control — Game Control + Momentum Control
Composite Score
73.8
Composite Rank: #23  •  6–6 (FBS games)
GC Score
72.9
#22 in FBS
GC Net
+23.1
Raw GC Net
GC Off
51.7
SOS-Adj Offense
GC Allowed
28.6
Avg Allowed ↓
MC Score
74.8
#35 in FBS
MC Net
+0.12
Raw MC Net
MC Off
1.27
Adj. Sequences
MC Win%
75%
When winning MC
Game Control Game-by-Game Win Probability Log
Wk Opponent Result GC Scores Avg WP% Ctrl% Never Trailed
GC Off GC Allowed GC Net
1 Eastern Michigan H W 52–27 92.5 5.8 +86.7 85.6% 96.8%
2 UTSA A W 43–36 53.3 18.3 +35 60.3% 34.6%
3 Arizona State A L 15–34 3.5 92.6 -89.1 8.8% 0%
4 Nicholls H 92.4 3.7 +88.7 90.7% 94%
6 Arkansas State A L 30–31 41.6 22 +19.6 55.1% 35%
7 Troy H L 41–48 89.9 6.2 +83.7 85.2% 93%
8 Marshall A L 37–40 37.7 27.7 +10 50.8% 18.6%
10 James Madison H L 20–52 7 84.4 -77.4 17.5% 0%
11 Louisiana A L 39–42 7.9 80.3 -72.4 16.3% 0%
12 Southern Miss A W 41–14 84.3 7.1 +77.2 82.2% 79.8%
13 UL Monroe H W 31–14 71.7 10.4 +61.4 74.1% 66.5%
14 South Alabama H W 49–26 89.8 5.8 +84.1 85.6% 91.3%
1 Rice NPost W 41–10 79.7 7.3 +72.5 81.8% 78.7%
6W / 12G
Momentum Control Game-by-Game Scoring Sequences Log
Wk Opponent Result Opponent-Adjusted Raw Edge Opp Wt
MC Off MC Def ↓ MC Net Off Def ↓
1 Eastern Michigan H W 52–27 1.44 0 +1.44 3 0 ✓ +3
0.48
2 UTSA A W 43–36 0.92 0 +0.92 1 0 ✓ +1
0.92
3 Arizona State A L 15–34 0 3.89 -3.89 0 2 ✗ 0
1
6 Arkansas State A L 30–31 0 0 +0 0 0 Tied
0.43
7 Troy H L 41–48 0.62 0 +0.62 1 0 ✓ +1
0.62
8 Marshall A L 37–40 0 0 +0 0 0 Tied
0.29
10 James Madison H L 20–52 1.12 4.47 -3.35 1 4 ✗ 1
1
11 Louisiana A L 39–42 0.89 0.59 +0.3 3 2 ✓ +3
0.3
12 Southern Miss A W 41–14 3.07 0 +3.07 4 0 ✓ +4
0.77
13 UL Monroe H W 31–14 0.37 0 +0.37 1 0 ✓ +1
0.37
14 South Alabama H W 49–26 1.12 0 +1.12 3 0 ✓ +3
0.37
1 Rice HPost W 41–10 0.36 0 +0.36 2 0 ✓ +2
0.18
6W / 12G 19 8