Houston Composite Control — 2024 | Punt & Rally
2024 Composite Control — Game Control + Momentum Control
Composite Score
45.8
Composite Rank: #94  •  4–8 (FBS games)
GC Score
31.6
#114 in FBS
GC Net
-34
Raw GC Net
GC Off
25.2
SOS-Adj Offense
GC Allowed
59.2
Avg Allowed ↓
MC Score
59.9
#78 in FBS
MC Net
-0.67
Raw MC Net
MC Off
0.22
Adj. Sequences
MC Win%
100%
When winning MC
MC > GC by 28 points. Houston generated strong consecutive scoring sequences (Momentum Control score: 59.9) but spent more time in contested win probability territory than their sequence count suggests (Game Control score: 31.6). This profile suggests a team that delivers explosive scoring runs but also plays in close, contested games.
Game Control Game-by-Game Win Probability Log
Wk Opponent Result GC Scores Avg WP% Ctrl% Never Trailed
GC Off GC Allowed GC Net
1 UNLV H L 7–27 5.7 88.3 -82.6 14.3% 0%
2 Oklahoma A L 12–16 15.3 61.7 -46.4 37.6% 0.7%
3 Rice H W 33–7 85.1 5.5 +79.6 86.3% 82.1%
4 Cincinnati A L 0–34 4.8 89.9 -85.1 11.9% 0%
5 Iowa State H L 0–20 12.3 66.3 -54 30.6% 0%
6 TCU A W 30–19 85 6.1 +78.9 84.8% 81.9%
8 Kansas N L 14–42 5.3 87.9 -82.6 13.1% 0%
9 Utah H W 17–14 16.3 45.5 -29.3 39.2% 1.4%
10 Kansas State H W 24–19 28.8 48.3 -19.5 40.9% 14.3%
12 Arizona A L 3–27 8.9 78.7 -69.8 22.3% 0%
13 Baylor H L 10–20 10 76.9 -66.9 25.1% 0%
14 BYU A L 18–30 15.9 55.7 -39.7 33.2% 4.3%
4W / 12G
Momentum Control Game-by-Game Scoring Sequences Log
Wk Opponent Result Opponent-Adjusted Raw Edge Opp Wt
MC Off MC Def ↓ MC Net Off Def ↓
1 UNLV H L 7–27 0 0 +0 0 0 Tied
1
2 Oklahoma A L 12–16 0 0 +0 0 0 Tied
1
3 Rice H W 33–7 0 0 +0 0 0 Tied
0.5
4 Cincinnati A L 0–34 0 3.4 -3.4 0 3 ✗ 0
1
5 Iowa State H L 0–20 0 3.93 -3.93 0 2 ✗ 0
1
6 TCU A W 30–19 2 0 +2 1 0 ✓ +1
1
8 Kansas A L 14–42 0 2.89 -2.89 0 2 ✗ 0
1
9 Utah H W 17–14 0 0 +0 0 0 Tied
1
10 Kansas State H W 24–19 1.96 1.96 +0 1 1 Tied
1
12 Arizona A L 3–27 0 1.66 -1.66 0 3 ✗ 0
0.55
13 Baylor H L 10–20 0 1.98 -1.98 0 1 ✗ 0
1
14 BYU A L 18–30 0 0 +0 0 0 Tied
1
4W / 12G 2 12