Buffalo Composite Control — 2023

Buffalo Composite Control — 2023 | Punt & Rally

2023 Composite Control — Game Control + Momentum Control

Composite Score

18.4

Composite Rank: #116 • 3–8 (FBS games)

GC Score

6.4

#126 in FBS

GC Net

-44.9

Raw GC Net

GC Off

12.1

SOS-Adj Offense

GC Allowed

Avg Allowed ↓

MC Score

30.4

#95 in FBS

MC Net

-1.28

Raw MC Net

MC Off

0.34

Adj. Sequences

MC Win%

50%

When winning MC

Game Control Game-by-Game Win Probability Log

Wk	Opponent	Result	GC Scores			Avg WP%	Ctrl%	Never Trailed
Wk	Opponent	Result	GC Off	GC Allowed	GC Net	Avg WP%	Ctrl%	Never Trailed
1	Wisconsin A	L 17–38	2.3	88.5	-86.2	5.7%	0%	—
2	Fordham H	—	54.5	24.4	+30.1	60.6%	44.9%	—
3	Liberty H	L 27–55	5.3	89.1	-83.8	13.3%	0%	—
4	Louisiana A	L 38–45	8	81.6	-73.7	19.9%	0%	—
5	Akron A	W 13–10	18.8	31.8	-13	45.5%	1.4%	—
6	Central Michigan H	W 37–13	87.9	6.5	+81.4	83.8%	85.9%	✓
7	Bowling Green H	L 14–24	12.3	68.4	-56.1	24%	2.1%	—
8	Kent State A	W 24–6	71.5	10.6	+60.9	77.2%	69.7%	—
10	Toledo A	L 13–31	5.1	94.2	-89.2	12.7%	0%	—
11	Ohio H	L 10–20	21.1	38.1	-17	41.5%	0%	—
12	Miami (OH) A	L 10–23	12.9	64.2	-51.3	32.3%	0%	—
13	Eastern Michigan H	L 11–24	6.7	86.7	-80	16.8%	0%	—
3W / 11G			—	—	—	—	—	—

Momentum Control Game-by-Game Scoring Sequences Log

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opponent-Adjusted			Raw		Edge	Opp Wt
Wk	Opponent	Result	MC Off	MC Def ↓	MC Net	Off	Def ↓	Edge	Opp Wt
1	Wisconsin A	L 17–38	0	3.54	-3.54	0	2	✗ 0	1
3	Liberty H	L 27–55	1.94	5.82	-3.88	1	3	✗ 1	1
4	Louisiana A	L 38–45	1.02	0	+1.02	1	0	✓ +1	1
5	Akron A	W 13–10	0	0	+0	0	0	Tied	0.08
6	Central Michigan H	W 37–13	0.26	0	+0.26	2	0	✓ +2	0.13
7	Bowling Green H	L 14–24	0	1.29	-1.29	0	2	✗ 0	0.65
8	Kent State A	W 24–6	0.01	0.01	+0	1	1	Tied	0.01
10	Toledo A	L 13–31	0	0	+0	0	0	Tied	1
11	Ohio H	L 10–20	0	1.72	-1.72	0	2	✗ 0	0.86
12	Miami (OH) A	L 10–23	0	2.52	-2.52	0	2	✗ 0	1
13	Eastern Michigan H	L 11–24	0	0.46	-0.46	0	1	✗ 0	0.46
3W / 11G			—	—	—	5	13	—	—