Western Michigan Composite Control — 2022

Western Michigan Composite Control — 2022 | Punt & Rally

2022 Composite Control — Game Control + Momentum Control

Composite Score

31.3

Composite Rank: #103 • 4–7 (FBS games)

GC Score

28.5

#106 in FBS

GC Net

-42.7

Raw GC Net

GC Off

14.5

SOS-Adj Offense

GC Allowed

57.2

Avg Allowed ↓

MC Score

#98 in FBS

MC Net

-1.11

Raw MC Net

MC Off

0.3

Adj. Sequences

MC Win%

100%

When winning MC

Game Control Game-by-Game Win Probability Log

Wk	Opponent	Result	GC Scores			Avg WP%	Ctrl%	Never Trailed
Wk	Opponent	Result	GC Off	GC Allowed	GC Net	Avg WP%	Ctrl%	Never Trailed
1	Michigan State A	L 13–35	2.7	89.2	-86.5	4.7%	0%	—
2	Ball State A	W 37–30	28.7	36.6	-7.9	49.7%	14.3%	—
3	Pittsburgh H	L 13–34	5.4	92.9	-87.4	13.6%	0%	—
4	San José State A	L 6–34	6.1	85.2	-79.1	15.1%	0%	—
5	New Hampshire H	—	98.9	1	+97.9	97.6%	100%	✓
6	Eastern Michigan H	L 23–45	5.5	89.3	-83.8	13.8%	0%	—
7	Ohio H	L 14–33	11	73.7	-62.7	27.5%	0%	—
8	Miami (OH) A	W 16–10	50.3	14.7	+35.6	65.9%	35.6%	—
10	Bowling Green A	L 9–13	10.1	76.9	-66.9	25.2%	0%	—
11	Northern Illinois H	L 21–24	39.7	33	+6.8	51.2%	22.4%	—
12	Central Michigan A	W 12–10	14.3	59.4	-45.1	31.9%	2.3%	—
13	Toledo H	W 20–14	45.2	34.6	+10.6	53.1%	39%	—
4W / 11G			—	—	—	—	—	—

Momentum Control Game-by-Game Scoring Sequences Log

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opponent-Adjusted			Raw		Edge	Opp Wt
Wk	Opponent	Result	MC Off	MC Def ↓	MC Net	Off	Def ↓	Edge	Opp Wt
1	Michigan State A	L 13–35	1.08	3.24	-2.16	1	3	✗ 1	1
2	Ball State A	W 37–30	0.25	0.25	+0	1	1	Tied	0.25
3	Pittsburgh H	L 13–34	0	1.66	-1.66	0	1	✗ 0	1
4	San José State A	L 6–34	0	1.47	-1.47	0	2	✗ 0	0.73
6	Eastern Michigan H	L 23–45	0	1.17	-1.17	0	2	✗ 0	0.58
7	Ohio H	L 14–33	0	0.72	-0.72	0	1	✗ 0	0.72
8	Miami (OH) A	W 16–10	0.67	0	+0.67	2	0	✓ +2	0.33
10	Bowling Green A	L 9–13	0	0.16	-0.16	0	1	✗ 0	0.16
11	Northern Illinois H	L 21–24	0	0	+0	0	0	Tied	0.14
12	Central Michigan A	W 12–10	0	0	+0	0	0	Tied	0.28
13	Toledo H	W 20–14	0	0.77	-0.77	0	1	✗ 0	0.77
4W / 11G			—	—	—	4	12	—	—