UCLA Composite Control — 2022 | Punt & Rally
← 2022 Composite Control Leaderboard
UCLA
2022 Composite Control — Game Control + Momentum Control
2026 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021
Composite Score
63
Composite Rank: #15  •  8–4 (FBS games)
GC Score
71.8
#15 in FBS
GC Net
+28.3
Raw GC Net
GC Off
50.8
SOS-Adj Offense
GC Allowed
22.5
Avg Allowed ↓
MC Score
54.3
#28 in FBS
MC Net
+0.11
Raw MC Net
MC Off
1
Adj. Sequences
MC Win%
100%
When winning MC
Game Control Game-by-Game Win Probability Log
Wk Opponent Result GC Scores Avg WP% Ctrl% Never Trailed
GC Off GC Allowed GC Net
1 Bowling Green H W 45–17 83 8.3 +74.7 92% 100% —
2 Alabama State H — 87.5 5.8 +81.7 85.4% 87% ✓
3 South Alabama H W 32–31 56.6 26.5 +30.1 68.1% 64% —
4 Colorado A W 45–17 96.3 1.1 +95.1 97.2% 100% ✓
5 Washington H W 40–32 65.6 20.8 +44.7 72.3% 62.3% —
6 Utah H W 42–32 64.1 14.8 +49.3 65.9% 49.7% ✓
8 Oregon A L 30–45 5.2 89.8 -84.7 12.9% 0% —
9 Stanford H W 38–13 89.8 3.8 +86 94.9% 100% —
10 Arizona State A W 50–36 88 6 +82 88.7% 100% —
11 Arizona H L 28–34 46.5 33.2 +13.3 63.3% 57.4% —
12 USC H L 45–48 33.9 41.8 -7.9 44.4% 21.2% —
13 California A W 35–28 67.4 15.4 +52 75.7% 77.5% —
1 Pittsburgh NPost L 35–37 60.2 25.4 +34.7 64.6% 64.3% —
8W / 12G ——— — — —
Momentum Control Game-by-Game Scoring Sequences Log
Wk Opponent Result Opponent-Adjusted Raw Edge Opp Wt
MC Off MC Def ↓ MC Net Off Def ↓
1 Bowling Green H W 45–17 0.31 0.16 +0.15 2 1 ✓ +2
0.16
3 South Alabama H W 32–31 0 1.85 -1.85 0 1 ✗ 0
1
4 Colorado A W 45–17 0.2 0 +0.2 2 0 ✓ +2
0.1
5 Washington H W 40–32 4.64 2.32 +2.32 2 1 ✓ +2
1
6 Utah H W 42–32 5.38 0 +5.38 2 0 ✓ +2
1
8 Oregon A L 30–45 0 0 +0 0 0 Tied
1
9 Stanford H W 38–13 2.31 0 +2.31 4 0 ✓ +4
0.58
10 Arizona State A W 50–36 0.75 1.49 -0.74 1 2 ✗ 1
0.75
11 Arizona H L 28–34 0.8 1.6 -0.8 1 2 ✗ 1
0.8
12 USC H L 45–48 2.66 5.31 -2.65 1 2 ✗ 1
1
13 California A W 35–28 0 0.81 -0.81 0 1 ✗ 0
0.81
1 Pittsburgh HPost L 35–37 0 1.66 -1.66 0 1 ✗ 0
1
8W / 12G ——— 15 11 — —