Tennessee Composite Control — 2022 | Punt & Rally
2022 Composite Control — Game Control + Momentum Control
Composite Score
67.5
Composite Rank: #12  •  11–2 (FBS games)
GC Score
77.2
#10 in FBS
GC Net
+37.1
Raw GC Net
GC Off
55.7
SOS-Adj Offense
GC Allowed
18.6
Avg Allowed ↓
MC Score
57.7
#17 in FBS
MC Net
+0.32
Raw MC Net
MC Off
1.44
Adj. Sequences
MC Win%
100%
When winning MC
Game Control Game-by-Game Win Probability Log
Wk Opponent Result GC Scores Avg WP% Ctrl% Never Trailed
GC Off GC Allowed GC Net
1 Ball State H W 59–10 99.8 0.1 +99.7 99.7% 100%
2 Pittsburgh A W 34–27 52.7 31.6 +21.2 58.5% 52.5%
3 Akron H W 63–6 97.1 0.1 +97.1 99.8% 100%
4 Florida H W 38–33 72.3 12.3 +60.1 79.4% 83.4%
6 LSU A W 40–13 95 3.9 +91.1 90.2% 98.3%
7 Alabama H W 52–49 41.8 32.8 +9 49.9% 27.4%
8 UT Martin H W 65–24 97.5 0.1 +97.4 99.6% 100%
9 Kentucky H W 44–6 96.5 3 +93.5 92.6% 100%
10 Georgia A L 13–27 3.8 89.4 -85.5 8.1% 0%
11 Missouri H W 66–24 96 1.8 +94.2 95.5% 100%
12 South Carolina A L 38–63 28.7 53.7 -25.1 48% 27.1%
13 Vanderbilt A W 56–0 98.2 1.5 +96.7 96.4% 100%
1 Clemson NPost W 31–14 74.5 12.1 +62.3 72.4% 67.7%
11W / 13G
Momentum Control Game-by-Game Scoring Sequences Log
Wk Opponent Result Opponent-Adjusted Raw Edge Opp Wt
MC Off MC Def ↓ MC Net Off Def ↓
1 Ball State H W 59–10 1.27 0 +1.27 5 0 ✓ +5
0.25
2 Pittsburgh A W 34–27 1.66 1.66 +0 1 1 Tied
1
3 Akron H W 63–6 0.24 0 +0.24 5 0 ✓ +5
0.05
4 Florida H W 38–33 3.63 1.81 +1.82 2 1 ✓ +2
1
6 LSU A W 40–13 7.11 0 +7.11 3 0 ✓ +3
1
7 Alabama H W 52–49 8.08 4.04 +4.04 2 1 ✓ +2
1
8 UT Martin H W 65–24 0 0 +0 6 1 ✓ +6
0
9 Kentucky H W 44–6 2.05 0 +2.05 1 0 ✓ +1
1
10 Georgia A L 13–27 0 9.48 -9.48 0 2 ✗ 0
1
11 Missouri H W 66–24 8.06 1.61 +6.45 5 1 ✓ +5
1
12 South Carolina A L 38–63 0 8.1 -8.1 0 4 ✗ 0
1
13 Vanderbilt A W 56–0 2.13 0 +2.13 3 0 ✓ +3
0.71
1 Clemson APost W 31–14 0 0 +0 0 0 Tied
1
11W / 13G 33 11