Ole Miss Composite Control — 2022 | Punt & Rally
2022 Composite Control — Game Control + Momentum Control
Composite Score
57.2
Composite Rank: #33  •  8–5 (FBS games)
GC Score
67.9
#23 in FBS
GC Net
+21.8
Raw GC Net
GC Off
47.7
SOS-Adj Offense
GC Allowed
25.9
Avg Allowed ↓
MC Score
46.5
#61 in FBS
MC Net
-0.36
Raw MC Net
MC Off
1.37
Adj. Sequences
MC Win%
100%
When winning MC
Game Control Game-by-Game Win Probability Log
Wk Opponent Result GC Scores Avg WP% Ctrl% Never Trailed
GC Off GC Allowed GC Net
1 Troy H W 28–10 95 1.2 +93.9 97.1% 100%
2 Central Arkansas H W 59–3 94.5 2.2 +92.4 94.6% 92.6%
3 Georgia Tech A W 42–0 98.6 1 +97.6 97.6% 100%
4 Tulsa H W 35–27 87.7 4.3 +83.4 93.2% 100%
5 Kentucky H W 22–19 86 8.2 +77.8 80.1% 94.4%
6 Vanderbilt A W 52–28 73.8 12.9 +60.9 84.1% 89.3%
7 Auburn H W 48–34 94.1 3 +91.1 92.5% 100%
8 LSU A L 20–45 39.1 38.4 +0.7 47.3% 27.2%
9 Texas A&M A W 31–28 47.7 28.5 +19.2 59.6% 42.4%
11 Alabama H L 24–30 22 51.6 -29.6 34.6% 0.6%
12 Arkansas A L 27–42 7.9 80.9 -73 19.7% 0%
13 Mississippi State H L 22–24 40.1 31.1 +9 52.9% 21.5%
1 Texas Tech NPost L 25–42 10.7 73.5 -62.9 24.7% 2.2%
8W / 13G
Momentum Control Game-by-Game Scoring Sequences Log
Wk Opponent Result Opponent-Adjusted Raw Edge Opp Wt
MC Off MC Def ↓ MC Net Off Def ↓
1 Troy H W 28–10 3.23 0 +3.23 2 0 ✓ +2
1
2 Central Arkansas H W 59–3 0 0 +0 3 0 ✓ +3
0
3 Georgia Tech A W 42–0 1.1 0 +1.1 3 0 ✓ +3
0.37
4 Tulsa H W 35–27 1.9 0.63 +1.27 3 1 ✓ +3
0.63
5 Kentucky H W 22–19 2.05 0 +2.05 1 0 ✓ +1
1
6 Vanderbilt A W 52–28 1.42 1.42 +0 2 2 Tied
0.71
7 Auburn H W 48–34 2.74 1.37 +1.37 2 1 ✓ +2
1
8 LSU A L 20–45 2.37 9.49 -7.12 1 4 ✗ 1
1
9 Texas A&M A W 31–28 1.7 1.7 +0 1 1 Tied
1
11 Alabama H L 24–30 4.04 8.08 -4.04 1 2 ✗ 1
1
12 Arkansas A L 27–42 3.92 5.88 -1.96 2 3 ✗ 2
1
13 Mississippi State H L 22–24 2.29 2.29 +0 1 1 Tied
1
1 Texas Tech HPost L 25–42 1.65 4.94 -3.29 1 3 ✗ 1
1
8W / 13G 23 18