2022 Composite Control — Game Control + Momentum Control
Composite Score
45.6
Composite Rank: #69
•
3–9
(FBS games)
GC Score
40.5
#86 in FBS
GC Net
-23.1
Raw GC Net
GC Off
24.6
SOS-Adj Offense
GC Allowed
47.6
Avg Allowed ↓
MC Score
50.8
#41 in FBS
MC Net
-0.1
Raw MC Net
MC Off
1.06
Adj. Sequences
MC Win%
66.7%
When winning MC
Game Control
Game-by-Game Win Probability Log
| Wk | Opponent | Result | GC Scores | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GC Off | GC Allowed | GC Net | |||
| 1 | Eastern Illinois H | W 34–27 | 98.4 | 0.6 | +97.8 |
| 2 | Tulsa A | L 35–38 | 22.1 | 60.2 | -38.1 |
| 3 | Vanderbilt H | L 28–38 | 27.3 | 46.3 | -19 |
| 4 | Kentucky A | L 23–31 | 5.1 | 84.6 | -79.5 |
| 5 | Ball State A | L 38–44 | 87.4 | 6.2 | +81.2 |
| 6 | Toledo H | L 32–52 | 1.6 | 97.6 | -96 |
| 7 | Eastern Michigan A | W 39–10 | 81.4 | 8.3 | +73.2 |
| 8 | Ohio A | L 17–24 | 33.7 | 40.8 | -7.1 |
| 10 | Central Michigan H | L 22–35 | 7.2 | 87.6 | -80.3 |
| 11 | Western Michigan A | W 24–21 | 33 | 39.7 | -6.8 |
| 12 | Miami (OH) H | L 23–29 | 39.7 | 40.1 | -0.4 |
| 13 | Akron H | L 12–44 | 30.8 | 60 | -29.2 |
| 3W / 12G | — | — | — | ||
Momentum Control
Game-by-Game Scoring Sequences Log
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Opponent-Adjusted | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MC Off | MC Def ↓ | MC Net | |||
| 1 | Eastern Illinois H | W 34–27 | 0 | 0 | +0 |
| 2 | Tulsa A | L 35–38 | 0.63 | 0.63 | +0 |
| 3 | Vanderbilt H | L 28–38 | 1.42 | 2.13 | -0.71 |
| 4 | Kentucky A | L 23–31 | 2.05 | 2.05 | +0 |
| 5 | Ball State A | L 38–44 | 0 | 0.51 | -0.51 |
| 6 | Toledo H | L 32–52 | 0 | 1.54 | -1.54 |
| 7 | Eastern Michigan A | W 39–10 | 1.75 | 0 | +1.75 |
| 8 | Ohio A | L 17–24 | 0.72 | 0 | +0.72 |
| 10 | Central Michigan H | L 22–35 | 0 | 0.28 | -0.28 |
| 11 | Western Michigan A | W 24–21 | 0 | 0 | +0 |
| 12 | Miami (OH) H | L 23–29 | 0.33 | 0.33 | +0 |
| 13 | Akron H | L 12–44 | 0.05 | 0.15 | -0.1 |
| 3W / 12G | — | — | — | ||