Louisiana Tech Composite Control — 2022

Louisiana Tech Composite Control — 2022 | Punt & Rally

2022 Composite Control — Game Control + Momentum Control

Composite Score

Composite Rank: #107 • 3–9 (FBS games)

GC Score

27.3

#111 in FBS

GC Net

-44.6

Raw GC Net

GC Off

11.6

SOS-Adj Offense

GC Allowed

56.2

Avg Allowed ↓

MC Score

26.6

#110 in FBS

MC Net

-1.55

Raw MC Net

MC Off

0.46

Adj. Sequences

MC Win%

66.7%

When winning MC

Game Control Game-by-Game Win Probability Log

Wk	Opponent	Result	GC Scores			Avg WP%	Ctrl%	Never Trailed
Wk	Opponent	Result	GC Off	GC Allowed	GC Net	Avg WP%	Ctrl%	Never Trailed
1	Missouri A	L 24–52	4.3	87.9	-83.7	5.2%	0%	—
2	Stephen F. Austin H	W 52–17	90.5	3.9	+86.6	90.3%	87.6%	✓
3	Clemson A	L 20–48	0.5	98.5	-98.1	1.2%	0%	—
4	South Alabama A	L 14–38	4.5	90.7	-86.2	11.3%	0%	—
6	UTEP H	W 41–31	94.5	3.9	+90.6	90.3%	97%	✓
7	North Texas A	L 27–47	7.1	91.1	-83.9	17.8%	0%	—
8	Rice H	L 41–42	57.8	24.5	+33.3	59.7%	60%	—
9	Florida International A	L 34–42	48.7	24.5	+24.2	61%	44.4%	—
10	Middle Tennessee H	W 40–24	63.4	12.3	+51.1	72%	56.6%	—
11	UTSA A	L 7–51	0.9	97.7	-96.9	2.2%	0%	—
12	Charlotte A	L 21–26	17.3	53.7	-36.4	38.3%	2%	—
13	UAB H	L 27–37	6.6	85.3	-78.6	8.5%	0%	—
3W / 12G			—	—	—	—	—	—

Momentum Control Game-by-Game Scoring Sequences Log

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opponent-Adjusted			Raw		Edge	Opp Wt
Wk	Opponent	Result	MC Off	MC Def ↓	MC Net	Off	Def ↓	Edge	Opp Wt
1	Missouri A	L 24–52	0	1.61	-1.61	0	1	✗ 0	1
2	Stephen F. Austin H	W 52–17	0	0	+0	3	0	✓ +3	0
3	Clemson A	L 20–48	2.52	10.07	-7.55	1	4	✗ 1	1
4	South Alabama A	L 14–38	0	0	+0	0	0	Tied	1
6	UTEP H	W 41–31	0.41	0.41	+0	1	1	Tied	0.41
7	North Texas A	L 27–47	0	1.81	-1.81	0	2	✗ 0	0.9
8	Rice H	L 41–42	0.24	0.24	+0	1	1	Tied	0.24
9	Florida International A	L 34–42	0.05	0	+0.05	2	0	✓ +2	0.02
10	Middle Tennessee H	W 40–24	1.78	0	+1.78	3	0	✓ +3	0.59
11	UTSA A	L 7–51	0	7.69	-7.69	0	5	✗ 0	1
12	Charlotte A	L 21–26	0	0	+0	0	0	Tied	0.21
13	UAB H	L 27–37	0	0	+0	0	0	Tied	0.97
3W / 12G			—	—	—	11	14	—	—