Eastern Michigan Composite Control — 2022 | Punt & Rally
2022 Composite Control — Game Control + Momentum Control
Composite Score
54
Composite Rank: #43  •  9–4 (FBS games)
GC Score
59.9
#46 in FBS
GC Net
+8.8
Raw GC Net
GC Off
44.5
SOS-Adj Offense
GC Allowed
35.7
Avg Allowed ↓
MC Score
48.1
#53 in FBS
MC Net
-0.26
Raw MC Net
MC Off
0.95
Adj. Sequences
MC Win%
100%
When winning MC
Game Control Game-by-Game Win Probability Log
Wk Opponent Result GC Scores Avg WP% Ctrl% Never Trailed
GC Off GC Allowed GC Net
1 Eastern Kentucky H W 42–34 69.3 12 +57.3 73.4% 73.8%
2 Louisiana A L 21–49 53.2 30.2 +23 56.8% 54.7%
3 Arizona State A W 30–21 55.4 34 +21.3 48.4% 35.5%
4 Buffalo H L 31–50 14.1 63.8 -49.7 29.2% 0.7%
5 Massachusetts H W 20–13 34.7 46 -11.3 48.6% 31.8%
6 Western Michigan A W 45–23 89.3 5.5 +83.8 86.2% 88.3%
7 Northern Illinois H L 10–39 8.3 81.4 -73.2 20% 0.7%
8 Ball State A W 20–16 26.3 38.6 -12.4 45.3% 11.7%
9 Toledo H L 24–27 24.7 40.7 -16 35.8% 0%
11 Akron A W 34–28 82.5 9.3 +73.2 78.5% 96.4%
12 Kent State A W 31–24 29.4 48.1 -18.6 42.6% 21%
13 Central Michigan H W 38–19 59 24.5 +34.5 55.8% 39.4%
1 San José State NPost W 41–27 61.1 29.5 +31.6 67.7% 60%
9W / 13G
Momentum Control Game-by-Game Scoring Sequences Log
Wk Opponent Result Opponent-Adjusted Raw Edge Opp Wt
MC Off MC Def ↓ MC Net Off Def ↓
1 Eastern Kentucky H W 42–34 0 0 +0 2 1 ✓ +2
0
2 Louisiana A L 21–49 0 3.41 -3.41 0 3 ✗ 0
1
3 Arizona State A W 30–21 0.75 0 +0.75 1 0 ✓ +1
0.75
4 Buffalo H L 31–50 0 1.44 -1.44 0 3 ✗ 0
0.48
5 Massachusetts H W 20–13 0 0 +0 1 0 ✓ +1
0
6 Western Michigan A W 45–23 0.36 0 +0.36 2 0 ✓ +2
0.18
7 Northern Illinois H L 10–39 0 0.42 -0.42 0 3 ✗ 0
0.14
8 Ball State A W 20–16 0.25 0.25 +0 1 1 Tied
0.25
9 Toledo H L 24–27 0 0 +0 0 0 Tied
0.77
11 Akron A W 34–28 0.05 0 +0.05 1 0 ✓ +1
0.05
12 Kent State A W 31–24 0.95 0.63 +0.32 3 2 ✓ +3
0.32
13 Central Michigan H W 38–19 0.28 0 +0.28 1 0 ✓ +1
0.28
1 San José State APost W 41–27 2.2 0 +2.2 3 0 ✓ +3
0.73
9W / 13G 15 13