Alabama Composite Control — 2022 | Punt & Rally
2022 Composite Control — Game Control + Momentum Control
Composite Score
81.1
Composite Rank: #2  •  11–2 (FBS games)
GC Score
87.6
#5 in FBS
GC Net
+54.1
Raw GC Net
GC Off
64.5
SOS-Adj Offense
GC Allowed
10.5
Avg Allowed ↓
MC Score
74.6
#4 in FBS
MC Net
+1.33
Raw MC Net
MC Off
2.21
Adj. Sequences
MC Win%
90%
When winning MC
Game Control Game-by-Game Win Probability Log
Wk Opponent Result GC Scores Avg WP% Ctrl% Never Trailed
GC Off GC Allowed GC Net
1 Utah State H W 55–0 98.4 0.1 +98.3 99.9% 100%
2 Texas A W 20–19 27.1 31 -3.9 48.9% 5.7%
3 UL Monroe H W 63–7 99.5 0 +99.4 100% 100%
4 Vanderbilt H W 55–3 98 0.1 +97.9 99.7% 100%
5 Arkansas A W 49–26 96 1.9 +94.1 95.3% 100%
6 Texas A&M H W 24–20 89.1 3.5 +85.6 91.4% 100%
7 Tennessee A L 49–52 32.8 41.8 -9 50.1% 26.9%
8 Mississippi State H W 30–6 96 1 +95 97.5% 100%
10 LSU A L 31–32 53.6 22.9 +30.7 67.3% 65.5%
11 Ole Miss A W 30–24 51.6 22 +29.6 65.4% 60.2%
12 Austin Peay H W 34–0 98.1 0.1 +98.1 99.8% 100%
13 Auburn H W 49–27 89.4 1.9 +87.5 96.9% 100%
1 Kansas State NPost W 45–20 74.8 10 +64.8 83% 78.8%
11W / 13G
Momentum Control Game-by-Game Scoring Sequences Log
Wk Opponent Result Opponent-Adjusted Raw Edge Opp Wt
MC Off MC Def ↓ MC Net Off Def ↓
1 Utah State H W 55–0 2.48 0 +2.48 8 0 ✓ +8
0.31
2 Texas A W 20–19 0 3.13 -3.13 0 1 ✗ 0
1
3 UL Monroe H W 63–7 0.23 0 +0.23 1 0 ✓ +1
0.23
4 Vanderbilt H W 55–3 2.84 0 +2.84 4 0 ✓ +4
0.71
5 Arkansas A W 49–26 5.88 1.96 +3.92 3 1 ✓ +3
1
6 Texas A&M H W 24–20 1.7 0 +1.7 1 0 ✓ +1
1
7 Tennessee A L 49–52 3.39 6.77 -3.38 1 2 ✗ 1
1
8 Mississippi State H W 30–6 9.16 0 +9.16 4 0 ✓ +4
1
10 LSU A L 31–32 2.37 0 +2.37 1 0 ✓ +1
1
11 Ole Miss A W 30–24 4.74 2.37 +2.37 2 1 ✓ +2
1
12 Austin Peay H W 34–0 0 0 +0 3 0 ✓ +3
0
13 Auburn H W 49–27 2.74 2.74 +0 2 2 Tied
1
1 Kansas State APost W 45–20 14.68 2.94 +11.74 5 1 ✓ +5
1
11W / 13G 35 8