Georgia at Alabama Week 15 College Football Matchup Georgia at Alabama Matchup - Week 15
Saturday, December 6, 2025 · Week 15 · Neutral Site
Away (Neutral)
28 7
Final
Home (Neutral)
📊 Punt & Rally Projection
Georgia
28
Alabama
23
P&R Line Georgia -5
P&R Total O/U 50
Confidence 86 High
Vegas Georgia -2.5 · O/U 47.5
Matchup Prediction
Alabama has the edge in this matchup
Both Momentum Control (CSS) and Game Control metrics favor Alabama entering this game.
Momentum Control
58.4%
Alabama wins
Lean
Game Control
50.6%
Alabama wins
Toss-up
Vegas Spread
Georgia -2.5
O/U 47.5
ESPN Bet
Advanced Stats
PPA + Success Rate agree → Georgia · 73.9% ATS historically
↓ See full breakdown
Advanced Stats
Advanced Analytics Matchup
Matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense) · 2025 season
Georgia PPA Edge
Agreement Signals — When All Metrics Agree
Elite · 83.1% ATS
PPA + PPO + SR + Havoc
Split
Metrics disagree
Elite · 82.4% ATS
PPA + PPO + Havoc
Split
Metrics disagree
Elite · 73.9% ATS
PPA + Success Rate
Both Agree
→ Georgia
Individual Factors — Ranked by Predictive Strength
PPA Overall
Points added per play · Elite predictor
Georgia #23
+0.342
Alabama #48
+0.294
Georgia Edge
PPA Passing
Pass efficiency edge · Strong predictor
Georgia #34
+0.477
Alabama #37
+0.577
Alabama Edge
Havoc Total
Def. disruption rate · Strong predictor
Georgia #80
0.151
Alabama #26
0.177
TFLs, sacks, PBUs, forced fumbles — higher is better
Alabama Edge
Points Per Opp
Drive-finishing edge · Strong predictor
Georgia #7
+8.443
Alabama #38
+7.715
Georgia Edge
Success Rate
Play consistency edge · Solid predictor
Georgia #14
+0.858
Alabama #62
+0.817
Georgia Edge
Field Position
Avg start (lower=better) · Solid predictor
Georgia #62
70.7
Alabama #39
69.7
Avg yards from opponent endzone — lower is better · longer bar = better field position
Alabama Edge
Advanced stats sourced from CFBD · 2025 season · Edges are matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense)
Power Ratings
Team Power Ratings
Overall · Offense · Defense ratings · Updated as season progresses
Georgia Rated Higher
Overall Power Rating
Georgia
28.5
Alabama
17.4
Offense Rating
Georgia
29.7
Alabama
21.7
Defense Rating (lower = better defense)
Georgia
0.0
Alabama
4.2
Power ratings updated throughout the season as results accumulate
Momentum Control (CSS)
Consecutive Scoring Sequences Who builds scoring momentum? Alabama Edge
Avg sequences created per game
Georgia
1.73
Alabama
1.91
Avg sequences allowed per game (lower is better)
Georgia
0.55
Alabama
0.55
Alabama +0.18
CSS Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 58.4% of games historically
Based on 11 games this season
Game Control (GC)
Win Probability Dominance Who controls games start to finish? Alabama Edge
Avg GC score per game (offense)
Georgia
59.1
Alabama
64.0
Avg GC score allowed per game (lower is better)
Georgia
25.3
Alabama
20.4
Alabama +4.9
GC Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 50.6% of games historically
Based on 12 games this season
Spread Context
ATS Historical Context
Based on 2021–2025 backtest · FBS vs FBS · Regular season

Both metrics agree on Alabama, but the GC edge is small. When metrics agree but GC is near-neutral, the agreed-upon team has covered only 46.7% of the time historically (n=224) — potentially a fade signal.

ATS data is informational only. Past cover rates do not guarantee future results.

About these metrics
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games.

Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: CSS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set.

Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: GS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set.

Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself