Texas Composite Control — 2025 | Punt & Rally
2025 Composite Control — Game Control + Momentum Control
Composite Score
72.5
Composite Rank: #26  •  10–3 (FBS games)
GC Score
67.9
#29 in FBS
GC Net
+16.7
Raw GC Net
GC Off
48
SOS-Adj Offense
GC Allowed
31.3
Avg Allowed ↓
MC Score
77.2
#25 in FBS
MC Net
+0.28
Raw MC Net
MC Off
1.07
Adj. Sequences
MC Win%
100%
When winning MC
Game Control Game-by-Game Win Probability Log
Wk Opponent Result GC Scores Avg WP% Ctrl% Never Trailed
GC Off GC Allowed GC Net
1 Ohio State A L 7–14 11.3 69.7 -58.3 28.3% 0%
2 San José State H W 38–7 82.9 5.1 +77.7 87.2% 78.1%
3 UTEP H W 27–10 96.9 0.6 +96.4 98.5% 100%
4 Sam Houston H W 55–0 87 4.5 +82.5 88.8% 85.5%
6 Florida A L 21–29 5.5 89.8 -84.3 13.8% 0%
7 Oklahoma N W 23–6 46.6 27.3 +19.4 61.6% 40%
8 Kentucky A W 16–13 50.8 17.9 +33 57.5% 40.4%
9 Mississippi State A W 45–38 20.5 55.8 -35.3 32.6% 8.9%
10 Vanderbilt H W 34–31 96.5 3.3 +93.3 91.9% 99.3%
12 Georgia A L 10–35 8.6 79.2 -70.6 18.4% 0%
13 Arkansas H W 52–37 80.9 8.1 +72.7 81.2% 84.2%
14 Texas A&M H W 27–17 43.9 22.1 +21.7 61.9% 30.7%
1 Michigan NPost W 41–27 40.7 23.8 +16.9 57.8% 26.7%
10W / 13G
Momentum Control Game-by-Game Scoring Sequences Log
Wk Opponent Result Opponent-Adjusted Raw Edge Opp Wt
MC Off MC Def ↓ MC Net Off Def ↓
1 Ohio State A L 7–14 0 0 +0 0 0 Tied
1
2 San José State H W 38–7 1.5 0 +1.5 3 0 ✓ +3
0.5
3 UTEP H W 27–10 0.76 0 +0.76 2 0 ✓ +2
0.38
4 Sam Houston H W 55–0 0.1 0 +0.1 5 0 ✓ +5
0.02
6 Florida A L 21–29 0 1.95 -1.95 0 1 ✗ 0
1
7 Oklahoma H W 23–6 2.61 0 +2.61 1 0 ✓ +1
1
8 Kentucky A W 16–13 0 0 +0 0 0 Tied
1
9 Mississippi State A W 45–38 1.9 1.9 +0 1 1 Tied
1
10 Vanderbilt H W 34–31 7.81 5.21 +2.6 3 2 ✓ +3
1
12 Georgia A L 10–35 0 6.44 -6.44 0 2 ✗ 0
1
13 Arkansas H W 52–37 1.7 1.7 +0 1 1 Tied
1
14 Texas A&M H W 27–17 6.97 3.48 +3.49 2 1 ✓ +2
1
1 Michigan HPost W 41–27 4.54 0 +4.54 2 0 ✓ +2
1
10W / 13G 20 8