Central Michigan Composite Control — 2025 | Punt & Rally
2025 Composite Control — Game Control + Momentum Control
Composite Score
41.1
Composite Rank: #106  •  6–6 (FBS games)
GC Score
40.9
#91 in FBS
GC Net
-17.8
Raw GC Net
GC Off
17.1
SOS-Adj Offense
GC Allowed
34.8
Avg Allowed ↓
MC Score
41.4
#123 in FBS
MC Net
-2.03
Raw MC Net
MC Off
0.16
Adj. Sequences
MC Win%
100%
When winning MC
Game Control Game-by-Game Win Probability Log
Wk Opponent Result GC Scores Avg WP% Ctrl% Never Trailed
GC Off GC Allowed GC Net
1 San José State A W 16–14 39.4 32.2 +7.2 52% 21%
2 Pittsburgh A L 17–45 4.7 93.7 -89 11.6% 0%
3 Michigan A L 3–63 2.7 94.9 -92.2 6.8% 0%
4 Wagner H 99.4 0.4 +99 99.1% 100%
5 Eastern Michigan H W 24–13 90.3 6.2 +84.1 84.5% 93%
6 Akron A L 22–28 15.9 60.6 -44.7 27.8% 0.7%
8 Bowling Green A W 27–6 71 14 +57.1 76.5% 71.5%
9 Massachusetts H W 38–13 91.2 3.6 +87.6 90.9% 91.1%
10 Western Michigan A L 21–24 49.8 20.4 +29.4 58.2% 39.3%
12 Buffalo H W 38–19 74.8 12.3 +62.5 76.5% 80.4%
13 Kent State A W 28–16 81.6 9 +72.6 77.6% 82%
14 Toledo H L 3–21 34.5 32.3 +2.1 50.2% 26.2%
1 Northwestern NPost L 7–34 7.2 73.4 -66.3 17.9% 0%
6W / 12G
Momentum Control Game-by-Game Scoring Sequences Log
Wk Opponent Result Opponent-Adjusted Raw Edge Opp Wt
MC Off MC Def ↓ MC Net Off Def ↓
1 San José State A W 16–14 0.5 0 +0.5 1 0 ✓ +1
0.5
2 Pittsburgh A L 17–45 0 4 -4 0 2 ✗ 0
1
3 Michigan A L 3–63 0 11.34 -11.34 0 5 ✗ 0
1
5 Eastern Michigan H W 24–13 0.48 0 +0.48 1 0 ✓ +1
0.48
6 Akron A L 22–28 0 0.21 -0.21 0 1 ✗ 0
0.21
8 Bowling Green A W 27–6 0.2 0 +0.2 3 0 ✓ +3
0.07
9 Massachusetts H W 38–13 0.04 0 +0.04 3 0 ✓ +3
0.01
10 Western Michigan A L 21–24 0 0.34 -0.34 0 1 ✗ 0
0.34
12 Buffalo H W 38–19 0 0.5 -0.5 0 1 ✗ 0
0.5
13 Kent State A W 28–16 0.24 0 +0.24 2 0 ✓ +2
0.12
14 Toledo H L 3–21 0 1.6 -1.6 0 1 ✗ 0
1
1 Northwestern APost L 7–34 0 2.28 -2.28 0 2 ✗ 0
1
6W / 12G 10 13