Boston College Composite Control — 2025

Boston College Composite Control — 2025 | Punt & Rally

2025 Composite Control — Game Control + Momentum Control

Composite Score

41.8

Composite Rank: #105 • 1–10 (FBS games)

GC Score

30.3

#107 in FBS

GC Net

-31.3

Raw GC Net

GC Off

19.6

SOS-Adj Offense

GC Allowed

Avg Allowed ↓

MC Score

53.4

#98 in FBS

MC Net

-1.26

Raw MC Net

MC Off

0.51

Adj. Sequences

MC Win%

100%

When winning MC

Game Control Game-by-Game Win Probability Log

Wk	Opponent	Result	GC Scores			Avg WP%	Ctrl%	Never Trailed
Wk	Opponent	Result	GC Off	GC Allowed	GC Net	Avg WP%	Ctrl%	Never Trailed
1	Fordham H	—	98.2	0.3	+97.9	99.2%	100%	✓
2	Michigan State A	L 40–42	22	38	-16.1	41%	5%	—
3	Stanford A	L 20–30	29.5	40.4	-10.9	46.4%	20.6%	—
5	California H	L 24–28	59.3	19.4	+39.9	64.5%	53.9%	—
6	Pittsburgh A	L 7–48	4	91.4	-87.4	10%	0%	—
7	Clemson H	L 10–41	6.2	86	-79.8	15.4%	0%	—
8	UConn H	L 23–38	13.2	69.3	-56.1	27.4%	0%	—
9	Louisville A	L 24–38	15.4	64.9	-49.5	27.3%	0%	—
10	Notre Dame H	L 10–25	13.5	62.5	-49	33.7%	0%	—
11	SMU H	L 13–45	7.5	86.9	-79.5	18.7%	0%	—
12	Georgia Tech H	L 34–36	40.8	31.9	+8.9	54.6%	31.1%	—
14	Syracuse A	W 34–12	54.7	20.4	+34.3	65.3%	49.7%	—
1W / 11G			—	—	—	—	—	—

Momentum Control Game-by-Game Scoring Sequences Log

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opponent-Adjusted			Raw		Edge	Opp Wt
Wk	Opponent	Result	MC Off	MC Def ↓	MC Net	Off	Def ↓	Edge	Opp Wt
2	Michigan State A	L 40–42	0	0	+0	0	0	Tied	1
3	Stanford A	L 20–30	2.11	2.11	+0	2	2	Tied	1
5	California H	L 24–28	1.07	1.07	+0	1	1	Tied	1
6	Pittsburgh A	L 7–48	0	10.01	-10.01	0	5	✗ 0	1
7	Clemson H	L 10–41	0	4.42	-4.42	0	2	✗ 0	1
8	UConn H	L 23–38	0	0	+0	0	0	Tied	0.8
9	Louisville A	L 24–38	0	1.92	-1.92	0	1	✗ 0	1
10	Notre Dame H	L 10–25	3.83	3.83	+0	1	1	Tied	1
11	SMU H	L 13–45	0	6.29	-6.29	0	3	✗ 0	1
12	Georgia Tech H	L 34–36	2.22	4.44	-2.22	1	2	✗ 1	1
14	Syracuse A	W 34–12	0.67	0.33	+0.34	2	1	✓ +2	0.33
1W / 11G			—	—	—	7	18	—	—