Tulane Composite Control — 2025 | Punt & Rally
2025 Composite Control — Game Control + Momentum Control
Composite Score
59.2
Composite Rank: #62  •  11–3 (FBS games)
GC Score
65.5
#31 in FBS
GC Net
+13.7
Raw GC Net
GC Off
40.8
SOS-Adj Offense
GC Allowed
27.1
Avg Allowed ↓
MC Score
52.9
#100 in FBS
MC Net
-1.29
Raw MC Net
MC Off
1.09
Adj. Sequences
MC Win%
100%
When winning MC
Game Control Game-by-Game Win Probability Log
Wk Opponent Result GC Scores Avg WP% Ctrl% Never Trailed
GC Off GC Allowed GC Net
1 Northwestern H W 23–3 91.7 5.1 +86.7 87.3% 94.9%
2 South Alabama A W 33–31 77.8 10.1 +67.7 84.3% 89%
3 Duke H W 34–27 93.1 4.3 +88.8 89.3% 95.7%
4 Ole Miss APost L 10–41 3.9 94.1 -90.2 9.7% 0%
5 Tulsa A W 31–14 71.7 11.1 +60.6 73.3% 66.5%
7 East Carolina H W 26–19 61.6 16.3 +45.3 67.4% 57.4%
8 Army H W 24–17 30.3 24.2 +6.1 53.7% 20.6%
10 UTSA A L 26–48 6.4 82.3 -75.8 14.2% 0%
11 Memphis A W 38–32 83 8.3 +74.7 79.3% 83%
12 Florida Atlantic H W 35–24 85.3 6.9 +78.4 82.8% 85.3%
13 Temple A W 37–13 85.4 7.4 +78 81.5% 81.5%
14 Charlotte H W 27–0 95.3 2.9 +92.4 92.6% 97.3%
15 North Texas H W 34–21 72.5 10.9 +61.7 79.6% 74.2%
1 Ole Miss APost L 10–41 3.5 96 -92.6 8.7% 0%
11W / 14G
Momentum Control Game-by-Game Scoring Sequences Log
Wk Opponent Result Opponent-Adjusted Raw Edge Opp Wt
MC Off MC Def ↓ MC Net Off Def ↓
1 Northwestern H W 23–3 2.28 0 +2.28 2 0 ✓ +2
1
2 South Alabama A W 33–31 1.49 0.37 +1.12 4 1 ✓ +4
0.37
3 Duke H W 34–27 5.12 1.71 +3.41 3 1 ✓ +3
1
4 Ole Miss A L 10–45 0 15.11 -15.11 0 5 ✗ 0
1
5 Tulsa A W 31–14 0.56 0 +0.56 1 0 ✓ +1
0.56
7 East Carolina H W 26–19 1.86 0.93 +0.93 2 1 ✓ +2
0.93
8 Army H W 24–17 0.57 0 +0.57 1 0 ✓ +1
0.57
10 UTSA A L 26–48 0 2.76 -2.76 0 3 ✗ 0
0.92
11 Memphis A W 38–32 2.21 1.1 +1.11 2 1 ✓ +2
1
12 Florida Atlantic H W 35–24 0 0 +0 0 0 Tied
0.24
13 Temple A W 37–13 1.14 0 +1.14 4 0 ✓ +4
0.28
14 Charlotte H W 27–0 0.02 0 +0.02 1 0 ✓ +1
0.02
15 North Texas H W 34–21 0.65 0.65 +0 1 1 Tied
0.65
1 Ole Miss APost L 10–41 0 12.09 -12.09 0 4 ✗ 0
1
11W / 14G 21 17